نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه حسابداری، واحد شاهرود، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شاهرود، ایران

2 استادیار، گروه حسابداری، واحد شاهرود، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شاهرود، ایران

3 استاد، گروه حسابداری، واحد شاهرود، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شاهرود، ایران

چکیده

هدف این مطالعه چارچوب رویه‌های زمینه‌ای توسعه‌ی حسابداری جهت پیاده‌سازی استارتاپ‌های مالی در شرکت‌های بازار سرمایه می‌باشد. این مطالعه به لحاظ نوع هدف در روش‌شناسی اکتشافی است و به لحاظ نوع جمع‌آوری داده‌ها ترکیبی تلقی می‌شود؛ زیرا در بخش کیفی از طریق تحلیل نظریه داده بنیاد و مصاحبه با خبرگان نسبت به شناسایی رویه‌های توسعه‌ی حسابداری جهت پیاده‌سازی استارتاپ مالی اقدام شد. سپس به‌منظور سنجش پایایی ابعاد شناسایی‌شده از فرآیند دلفی فازی بهره برده شد تا در بخش کمی از طریق ماتریس میک‌مک، محورهای تأییدشده از مرحله تحلیل دلفی فازی را بر اساس مقایسه‌ی زوجی موردبررسی قرار دهد. درنهایت نیز به‌منظور تعیین محورترین بعد زمینه‌ای توسعه حسابداری استارتاپ در بستر شرکت‌های بازار سرمایه، ماتریس شدت تأثیرگذاری مستقیم؛ غیرمستقیم و کلی بر اساس روابط ریاضی و متغیرهای زبانی مقیاس فازی ، به‌عنوان مبنای متناظر اثرگذاری هریک از ابعاد بر یکدیگر بسط داده شد. نتایج این مطالعه در بخش کیفی طی 13 مصاحبه، تعداد 4 مقوله؛ 8 مؤلفه و 41 مضمون مفهوم را شناسایی نمود و در قالب یک چارچوب نظری چندبعدی بسط داد. در بخش کمی نیز مشخص شد، شدت اثرگذاری بُعد تقویت زمینه‌های آموزشی « » نسبت به سایر ابعاد موردبررسی، بالاتر است و این بُعد به‌عنوان محوری‌ترین عامل زمینه‌ای توسعه حسابداری استارتاپ در بستر شرکت‌های بازار سرمایه انتخاب گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Accounting Development Procedures Framework for Implementing Financial Startups in Capital Market Companies

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyed Alireza Hossieni, 1
  • Hasan Valiyan 2
  • Mohammadreza Abdoli 3
  • Maryam Shahri 2

1 PhD Student, Department of Accounting, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Accounting, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this research is the startup accounting development field’s framework and appraisal in the context of capital market companies. This study is exploratory in terms of the type of objective, and it is considered mixed in terms of the type of data collection. In order to measure the reliability of the identified dimensions, the fuzzy Delphi process was used to examine the confirmed axes from the phase of the fuzzy Delphi analysis, based on pairwise comparison in the quantitative section through the Micmac matrix. The results of this study in the qualitative part, during 13 interviews, identified four categories, 8 components, and 41 themes of the concept and developed them in the form of a multidimensional theoretical framework. In the quantitative section, it was also determined that the effectiveness of the "G_1" educational field strengthening dimension is higher than the other examined dimensions, and this dimension was selected as the most central factor in the development of startup accounting in the context of capital market companies.

Introduction

Financial startups are considered one of the most emerging ways of managing financial resources and accounting of the third generation. While accelerating the liquidity circulation cycle in industries, they also possess higher competitive capacities to leverage the advantages of financial markets. However, the importance of the development of startups is not necessarily tied to their novelty or uniqueness in driving competitive business dynamics, but rather to their ability to provide financial services at lower costs, with greater speed and universality at the financial market level, meeting the needs of beneficiaries. This can gain legitimacy for companies through their financial and accounting functions.

Literature Review

One of the most exemplary business models is startups, which are often created as small and flexible units within organizational structures, or as start-up businesses in the form of small and medium-sized companies through innovative plans, they consistently aim to provide goods and new services that are competitive in the market. Therefore, startups can be defined in two ways. On the one hand, startups can be described as companies with the goal of achieving rapid growth in a specific market or situation. On the other hand, startups can be considered human institutions designed to create new products or services under uncertain conditions. Accordingly, startups should be considered a valuable resource for generating new knowledge, which has gradually transformed into innovation with the development of entrepreneurial infrastructure, as they leverage emerging technologies to invent new products and business models.

Methodology

This study is considered exploratory in terms of its goal within the methodology because it uses the analysis of foundational data theory based on Glazer's approach to identify the background procedures of accounting development for the implementation of financial startups in the context of capital market companies. In terms of the study’s results, it is developmental because the phenomena investigated lack theoretical coherence and an integrated content framework in the study’s context. Regarding the type of data, this study should be considered mixed. In the qualitative part, using foundational data theory and conducting interviews, the effective background procedures for the development of accounting for the implementation of financial startups are identified in the form of a theoretical framework, ensuring the reliability of the identified dimensions through Delphi analysis. In the quantitative part of this study, using the MicMak matrix, an attempt is made to identify the most central area of ​​startup accounting development in the context of capital market companies by comparing the criteria in the row " " and the column " ".

Result

In the qualitative part, through the approach of analyzing foundational data theory and conducting interviews with experts, a total of 41 conceptual themes; 8 components, and 4 categories were identified during the three stages of open, central, and selective coding. Based on this, a theoretical, multidimensional framework was developed, focusing on key axes effective in the development of startup accounting. Subsequently, the reliability of the axes identified through the foundational data theory was measured by performing a fuzzy Delphi analysis. The results indicate the confirmation of all dimensions within the analysis threshold of 0.7.

Discussion

In the following, the axes identified through the Micmac matrix were compared in pairs between the positive pole "+ve" and the negative pole "-ve" to determine the level of influence of row "i" on column "i" or vice versa. The results of the placement of the 8 confirmed axes in the 4 quadrants of the Micmac matrix are significant. Based on this analysis, it was determined that the two dimensions of strengthening the ecosystem fields "G5" and strengthening the educational fields "G1" respectively have a higher level of influence and effectiveness than the other dimensions.
The results indicate that capital market companies, to advance their goals of implementing start-up accounting procedures, should focus on strengthening the skill capacities of accountants to effectively use these types of software platforms, based on structural needs assessments.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Accounting platforms
  • Effective fields
  • Evaluation matrix
  • Startup
  1. پوردشت، مریم.، حسن‌پورقروقچی، اسماعیل.، مکی‌زاده، وحید. (1401). توسعه مدل بازاریابی کارآفرینانه در استارتاپ‌ها، فصلنامه علمی رهیافتی در مدیریت بازرگانی، 3(3): 190-211. https://asm.pgu.ac.ir/article_704958.html?lang=en
  2. حاجت‌پور، پژمان.، ملاعلیزاده‌زواردهی، صابر.، صالحی، اله‌کرم. (1402). ارائه مدل توسعه استارتاپ‌های فناورانه جهت پویایی سازوکارهای راهبری برون‌سازمانی، دانش مالی تحلیل اوراق بهادار، 16(57): 73-91. https://doi.org/10.30495/‌afi.2023.‌1980824.‌1201
  3. ستایش، محمدحسین.، رضائیان‌زاده، زهرا. (1402). شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی عوامل مؤثر بر نوآوری در حسابداری، مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی، 20(78): 1-33. doi: 10.22054‌/qjma.2023.73784.2461
  4. شاکری، رباب.، مرفوع، محمد. (1397). تأثیر استراتژی‌های‌ کسب‌وکار بر محیط اطلاعاتی شرکت‌ها، مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی، 15(59): 59-82. doi: 10.22054‌/qjma.2018.9824
  5. شهرابی، بهزاد.، اشرفی، مجید.، عباسی، ابراهیم. (1398). مدل‌یابی عوامل تأثیرگذار بر تأمین مالی استارتاپ‌ها (کسب‌وکارهای نوپا) با تکنیک دیمتل، راهبرد مدیریت مالی، 7(2): 61-89. https://doi.org/10.22051/jfm.2019.21525.1753
  6. فتحی، فریبا.، میرابی، وحیدرضا.، حقیقت‎منفرد، جلال. (1401). شناسایی میزان اهمیت ایده‌سنجی و تایمینگ در موفقیت استارتاپ‌ها با تاکید بر برنامه‌ریزی منابع مالی و سرمایه‌گذاری، اقتصاد مالی، 16(58): 309-330. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.‌25383833.‌1401.16.58.15.1
  7. کردستانی، نسیم.، رضایی، نکیسا. (1399). بررسی رابطه عوامل درون سازمانی بر موفقیت استارتاپ ناب، نشریه مدیریت تبلیغات و فروش، 1(3): 512-537. https://www.tpbin.com/jarticle/15143
  8. مرادی، شیوا.، نادری، نادر.، دل‌انگیزان، سهراب. (1399). بررسی فرآیند توسعه استارتاپ‌های فین‌تک در ایران، فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی توسعه کارآفرینی، 13(1): 121-140. https://doi.org/10.22059/jed.2020.296930.653250
  9. مروت، امیربهادر.، نظری‌زاده، فرهاد. (1401). سناریوهای استارتاپ‌های صنعت فین‌تک و بانکداری ایران در افق 1410 با استفاده از تحلیل اثرات متقاطع، بهبود مدیریت، 16(3): 1-32. https://doi.org/10.22034/jmi.2022.364628.2843
  10. Atherton, A. (2012). Cases of start-up financing: An analysis of new venture capitalization structures and patterns. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 18(1), 28-47. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552551211201367
  11. Blank, S., & Euchner, J. (2018). The Genesis and Future of Lean Startup: An Interview with Steve Blank. Research-Technology Management, 61(5), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2018.1495963
  12. Blank, S. (2013). Why the Lean Start-Up Changes Everything, Harvard Business Review, http://hbr.org/2013/05/why-the-lean-start-up-changes-everything
  13. Comte, A., Campagne, C, S., Lange, S., García Bruzon, A., Hein, L., Santos-Martín, F., & Levrel, F. (2022). Ecosystem accounting: Past scientific developments and future challenges. Ecosystem Services, 10(2), 105-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101486
  14. Del Sarto, N., Cazares, C. C. & Di Minin, A. (2022). Startup accelerators as an open environment: The impact on startups’ innovative performance. Technovation, 113(2), 78-99. https://doi.org/10‌.1016/‌j.technovation.2021.102425
  15. Doll, W.J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988) the Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 259-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/248851
  16. Dushnitsky, G., & Yu, L. (2022). Why do incumbents fund startups? A study of the antecedents of corporate venture capital in China. Research Policy, 51(3), 210-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104463
  17. Feyen, E., Frost, J., Gambacorta, L., Natarajan, H., & Saal, M. (2021). Fintech and the digital transformation of accounting services: implications for market structure and public policy. The Bank for International Settlements and the World Bank Group, 117(5), 1-56.
  18. Forrester, P. J. (2017). Matrix Polar Decomposition and Generalizations of the Blaschke-Petkantschin Formula in Integral Geometry. Arxiv Mathematics, 5(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1701.04505
  19. Gefen, O., Reeb, D., & Sulaeman, J. (2023). Startups’ demand for accounting expertise: evidence from a randomized field experiment. Review of Accounting Studies, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-023-09775-8
  20. Gleason, K., Kannan, Y.H., & Rauch, C. (2022). Fraud in startups: what stakeholders need to know. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(4), 1191-1221. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2021-0264
  21. Gleason, K., Kannan, Y.H., & Rauch, C. (2022). Fraud in startups: what stakeholders need to know. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(4), 1191-1221. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2021-0264
  22. Graham, P. (1994). On list: advanced techniques for Common Lisp. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-030552-9.
  23. Hoffmann, C.H. (2023). Startup valuation reassessed: against celebrity, sustainability and state intervention. Journal of Ethics in Entrepreneurship and Technology, 3(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/‌10.1108/JEET-08-2022-0012
  24. John William, A., Suresh, M., & Subramanian, N. (2023). Examining the causal relationships among factors influencing SMEs' competitive advantage: a TISM-neutrosophic MICMAC approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2022-0529
  25. Jönsson, P.W., & Jönsson, P.W. (2017). Administration Degree Project in Accounting and Finance Management Control Systems in Innovative Startups A multi case study of Swedish R & D startup companies Prepared.
  26. Kubota, T., & Okuda, Sh. (2023). Relationship between top managers’ interest in accounting information and accounting practices in startups. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 51(2), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2023.100640
  27. Mauricette, J., Wells, P., & Haar, J. (2022). User perceptions of cloud-based small business accounting software, Pacific Accounting Review, 34(4), 595-613. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-05-2021-0065
  28. Osei-Assibey Bonsu, M., Wang, Y., & Guo, Y. (2023). Does fintech lead to better accounting practices? Empirical evidence. Accounting Research Journal, 36(2/3), 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-07-2022-0178
  29. Ozili, P, K. (2019). Impact of digital finance on financial inclusion and stability, Borsa Istanbul Review, 18(4), 329-340. https://doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.bir.2017.12.003
  30. Riepe, J. & Uhl, K. (2020). Startups’ demand for non-financial resources: Descriptive evidence from an international corporate venture capitalist. Finance Research Letters, 36(2), 107-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.101321
  31. Sahoo, P.S.B.B., & Thakur, V. (2023). Blockchainembedded supply chain finance solutions for Indian MSMEs: a TISM and MICMAC approach. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-06-2022-0264
  32. Sampat, B., Mogaji, E., & Nguyen, N.P. (2023). The dark side of FinTech in financial services: a qualitative enquiry into FinTech developers’ perspective. International Journal of Bank Marketing https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-07-2022-0328
  33. Siimann, P. (2018). Usage of Efficiency Matrix in the Analysis of Financial Statements [Doctoral dissertation, Tallinn University of Technology], Tallinn University of Technology.
  34. Tomy, S., & Pardede, E. (2018). From Uncertainties to Successful Start Ups: A Data Analytic Approach to Predict Success in Technological Entrepreneurship. Sustainability, 10(3), 602-630. https://doi.org/‌10.3390/su10030602
  35. Veltmeyer, J., & Mohamed, S. (2017). Investigation into the hierarchical nature of TQM variables using structural modelling. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 34(4), 462-477. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-04-2015-0052
  36. Xu, B., Zhang, Sh., & Chen, X. (2021). Uncertainty in financing interest rates for startups, Industrial Marketing Management, 94(2), 150-158 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.026