نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه حسابداری، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی و تربیتی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران.

2 گروه حسابداری، دانشکده علوم اقتصادی و اداری، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران

3 گروه حسابداری، دانشکده علوم  انسانی، دانشگاه جیرفت، جیرفت، ایران

چکیده

اعتبار تجاری به‌عنوان یکی از ابزارهای در دسترس برای تأمین مالی، به‌ویژه برای شرکت‌های دارای محدودیت مالی، نقش پررنگی ایفا می‌کند. هدف از این پژوهش بررسی تأثیر محدودیت مالی بر رابطه بین انحراف استراتژیک و اعتبار تجاری است. پژوهش حاضر ازنظر هدف، کاربردی و از حیث ماهیت و روش، در دسته پژوهش‌های توصیفی – همبستگی قرار می‌گیرد و داده‌ها با استفاده از روش رگرسیونی مورد تحلیل قرار گرفته‌اند. جامعه آماری شامل 124 شرکت پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران طی سال‌های 1395 تا 1403 (معادل 1116 مشاهده سال-شرکت) بوده است. یافته‎ها نشان دادند که میان انحراف استراتژیک و استفاده از اعتبار تجاری به‌عنوان ابزاری برای تأمین مالی رابطه‌ مثبت و معنادار وجود دارد که این رابطه در میان شرکت‌های با محدودیت‌های مالی شدید و در شرایط بحرانی ریسک ورشکستگی قوی‌تر است، اما در شرکت‌هایی که وضعیت مالی باثبات‌تری دارند و در محدوده امن هستند، این اثر ضعیف‌تر مشاهده شده است. تحلیل‌های حساسیت متعددی شامل تغییر شیوه اندازه‌گیری متغیر مستقل (تهیه شاخص انحراف استراتژیک با استفاده از روش تجزیه‌وتحلیل مؤلفه اصلی)، حذف متغیرهای کنترلی، حذف اثرات سال و صنعت و نیز آزمون مدل با در نظر گرفتن متغیر تعدیل‌گر در گروه‌های مختلف برحسب محدودیت مالی انجام شد که در تمام موارد، نتایج اصلی تأیید شده است. نتایج نشان دادند که انحراف استراتژیک می‌تواند به‌طور مستقیم بر سیاست‌های اعتباری شرکت‌ها اثر بگذارد و هر چه این انحراف بیشتر باشد، وابستگی شرکت به اعتبار تجاری نیز افزایش می‌یابد و محدودیت مالی نیز می‎تواند باعث تعدیل این رابطه شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Relationship Between Strategic Deviation and Trade Credit, Considering the Role of Financial Constraints

نویسندگان [English]

  • Jamil Ebrahimi 1
  • Hosein Ameri 2
  • Esmaeil Amiri 3

1 Department of Accounting, Faculty of Social Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

2 Department of Accounting,Faculty of Economic and administrative sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

3 Department of Accounting, Faculty of Humanities, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran

چکیده [English]

Trade credit serves as an accessible financing tool, particularly for firms facing financial constraints. This study aimed to examine the effect of financial constraints on the relationship between strategic deviation and trade credit. The research was applied in purpose and descriptive–correlational in design, and the data were analyzed using regression techniques. The statistical population included 124 firms listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange between 2016 and 2024, yielding 1,116 firm-year observations. The findings indicated a positive and significant relationship between strategic deviation and the use of trade credit, which was stronger among firms with severe financial constraints and under high bankruptcy risk, but weaker in firms with more stable financial conditions. Multiple sensitivity analyses, including alternative measures of the independent variable, exclusion of control variables, removal of year and industry effects, and testing the model with a moderating variable across groups with varying financial constraints, consistently confirmed the main results. Overall, the results showed that strategic deviation directly influenced corporate credit policies, with greater deviation increasing reliance on trade credit, and that financial constraints could moderate this relationship.
 

Introduction

Strategic deviation within firms refers to a substantial divergence from the prevailing norms, conventions, and competitive practices of a given industry. Such deviation is not limited to superficial differences in tactics but reflects a deeper commitment to pursuing distinct strategic orientations and allocating organizational resources in unconventional ways. In many contexts, including emerging economies, these deviations are often driven by firms’ attempts to achieve differentiation, create innovative products and services, and ultimately secure new and more sustainable competitive advantages. By deliberately distancing themselves from industry routines, firms seek to overcome competitive inertia, foster innovation, and position themselves as leaders rather than followers. However, these benefits are rarely cost-neutral. Departures from industry norms typically require additional and sometimes substantial financial commitments to support experimentation, innovation, and higher levels of risk-taking. Therefore, the financing dimension of strategic deviation becomes critical, as firms must secure adequate resources to sustain their unconventional strategies. The purpose of this study is to examine whether and how strategic deviation influences firms’ reliance on trade credit as a substitute or a complementary financing source. Specifically, the research investigates whether firms that deviate more strongly from industry norms and resource allocation patterns exhibit higher usage of trade credit, and how this relationship is conditioned by the severity of financial constraints.

Literature Review

In Iran’s economic and financial environment, the financing aspect of strategic deviation takes on particular significance. The country’s capital markets remain underdeveloped relative to those of advanced economies, and bank loans constitute the dominant and often sole source of external financing for most firms. Yet access to bank credit is limited and frequently subject to strict conditions imposed by lending institutions, the financial condition of the borrowing firm, and broader macroeconomic constraints. For many corporations, these restrictions create persistent financing challenges that constrain their ability to sustain growth and implement innovative strategies. Within this context, trade credit—defined as credit extended by suppliers in the form of deferred payments—emerges as an essential alternative financing mechanism.
Trade credit is not only flexible and relational but also less dependent on collateral compared to formal bank loans, making it particularly valuable for firms facing financial constraints. Consequently, understanding how strategic deviation interacts with firms’ reliance on trade credit is an important question in both strategic management and corporate finance, particularly in emerging economies such as Iran.

Methodology

This study is applied in purpose and descriptive–correlational in method, drawing on an empirical sample of 124 non-financial firms listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange over the period 2016–2024, yielding 1,116 firm-year observations. To test the hypotheses, regression analysis techniques were employed, with trade credit measured through two widely accepted proxies: (i) the ratio of accounts payable to the cost of goods sold, and (ii) the ratio of accounts payable to total sales. Strategic deviation was operationalized through six indicators reflecting firms’ allocation of resources and financial structures: the ratio of net fixed assets to gross fixed assets, the inventory-to-sales ratio, the selling, general, and administrative expenses-to-sales ratio, the debt-to-equity ratio, the advertising expenditures-to-sales ratio, and the R&D expenditures-to-sales ratio. These variables capture multiple dimensions of deviation, from production intensity to marketing orientation and financial leverage. To ensure methodological robustness, principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to these six variables, producing a composite index of strategic deviation used in sensitivity analyses. This approach reduces multicollinearity and provides a more comprehensive representation of deviation patterns.

Results and Discussion

The empirical findings consistently demonstrate a positive and statistically significant relationship between strategic deviation and the use of trade credit. Firms that pursue greater deviation from industry conventions are more likely to depend on trade credit financing, suggesting that suppliers play a critical role in enabling unconventional strategies. Moreover, the relationship between deviation and trade credit is moderated by financial conditions: the association is stronger for firms experiencing severe financial constraints or operating under heightened bankruptcy risk, whereas the relationship weakens for firms in stronger financial positions or operating within the “safe zone.” These results indicate that trade credit serves as a crucial financing mechanism precisely when firms need it most—under conditions of resource scarcity and elevated risk. Robustness checks further reinforce these findings. The results remain consistent across multiple sensitivity analyses, including alternative measures of strategic deviation, the exclusion of control variables, the omission of year and industry fixed effects, and re-estimation across subsamples classified by financial constraints. Across all these tests, the central conclusion—that strategic deviation encourages greater reliance on trade credit—remains stable.

Conclusion

Taken together, the findings contribute several important insights. First, they highlight the pivotal role of strategic deviation in shaping short-term financing policies, particularly in environments where bank financing is limited. Second, the results underscore the substitutive role of trade credit, which allows strategically deviant firms to overcome financial barriers and continue pursuing innovation. Third, the study provides evidence from an emerging economy that broadens existing theoretical discussions in strategic management and corporate finance, which have largely been developed in advanced markets. From a managerial perspective, the findings suggest that managers of firms adopting non-traditional strategies should explicitly incorporate trade credit into their financing portfolios as a deliberate component of resource planning. Doing so not only sustains their strategic initiatives but also enhances resilience against financial shocks. From a policy-making perspective, the results highlight the need for supportive institutional frameworks that reduce structural barriers in supplier credit markets, enabling innovative firms to thrive. Ultimately, this study advances the literature by bridging strategic management and finance perspectives. It demonstrates that strategic deviation, while a driver of competitive differentiation, simultaneously creates financing challenges that can be mitigated through reliance on trade credit. By integrating insights on strategy, finance, and institutional context, the research offers a comprehensive view of how firms in emerging markets manage the tension between innovation and resource constraints.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Bankruptcy Risk
  • Financial Constraints
  • Strategic Deviation
  • Trade Credit
  1. ابراهیمی، جمیل و امیری، اسماعیل. (1404). تأثیر مدیریت سود بر رابطه بین توانایی مدیریت و انتخاب نوع بدهی. دانش حسابداری مالی، 12(1)، 59-80. doi: 10.30479/jfak.2025.21325.3259
  2. افلاطونی، عباس و نوروزی، محمد. (1399). عوامل مؤثر بر عرضه و تقاضای اعتبار تجاری: رویکردهای ایستا و پویا. دانش حسابداری، 11(1)، 35-59. doi: 10.22103/jak.2020.13295.2879
  3. افلاطونی، عباس. (1397). اقتصادسنجی در پژوهش‎های مالی و حسابداری با نرم‌افزار Eviews، تهران، ترمه. https://www.termehbook.com/product/9789649786698/
  4. خواجوی، شکرالله؛ غیوری مقدم، علی و حاجب، حمیدرضا. (1400). بررسی تأثیر اعتبار تجاری بر چسبندگی هزینه‏ها. دانش حسابداری مالی، 8(3)، 125-141. doi: 10.30479/jfak.2021.15556.2869
  5. رحمانیان کوشککی، عبدالرسول، وحدان اصل، سهراب. (1404). تأثیر سرمایه‎گذاری در دارایی‎های ثابت و عملکرد مالی در رابطه میان مسئولیت‎پذیری اجتماعی و تأمین مالی از طریق بدهی. مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی، 22(87)، 267-304. doi: 10.22054/qjma.2025.83762.2646
  6. رضائی پیته‎نوئی، یاسر. (1404). گزارشگری پایداری شرکتی و تأمین مالی اعتبار تجاری. مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjma.2026.88586.2720
  7. طاهری، ماندانا و قبادی اسکی، سینا. (1402). تأثیر انحراف استراتژیک شرکت از صنعت بر کیفیت حسابرسی و پیامدهای متعاقب آن. بررسی‏‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 30(3)، 506-531. doi: 10.22059/acctgrev.2023.347559.1008715
  8. مرادی، محمد و سپهوندی، سعیده. (1394). تأثیر استراتژی‌های رقابتی بر پایداری عملکرد مالی و ریسک. نشریه پژوهش‌های حسابداری مالی، 7(3)، 75-90. far.ui.ac.ir/article_17053.html
  9. Abdulla, Y., Dang, V. A., & Khurshed, A. (2017). Stock market listing and the use of trade credit: Evidence from public and private firms. Journal of Corporate Finance46, 391-410.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.08.004
  10. Aktas, N., De Bodt, E., Lobez, F., & Statnik, J. C. (2012). The information content of trade credit. Journal of Banking & Finance36(5), 1402-1413.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.12.001
  11. Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The journal of finance23(4), 589-609.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00843.x
  12. Atanasova, C. (2012). How do firms choose between intermediary and supplier finance?. Financial Management41(1), 207-228.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2012.01183.x
  13. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management17(1), 99-120.‏ https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  14. Bednar, M. K., Boivie, S., & Prince, N. R. (2013). Burr under the saddle: How media coverage influences strategic change. Organization Science24(3), 910-925.‏ https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0770
  15. Bentley, K. A., Omer, T. C., & Sharp, N. Y. (2013). Business strategy, financial reporting irregularities, and audit effort. Contemporary accounting research30(2), 780-817.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2012.01174.x
  16. Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. (2003). Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. The Quarterly journal of economics118(4), 1169-1208.‏ https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552775
  17. Biais, B., & Gollier, C. (1997). Trade credit and credit rationing. The review of financial studies10(4), 903-937.‏ https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/10.4.903
  18. Burkart, M., & Ellingsen, T. (2004). In-kind finance: A theory of trade credit. American economic review94(3), 569-590.‏ https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/0002828041464579
  19. Carpenter, M. A. (2000). The price of change: The role of CEO compensation in strategic variation and deviation from industry strategy norms. Journal of Management26(6), 1179-1198.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(00)00078-7
  20. Chen, D., Liu, M., Ma, T., & Martin, X. (2017). Accounting quality and trade credit. Accounting Horizons31(3), 69-83.‏ https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51711
  21. Chen, S., Ma, H., & Wu, Q. (2019). Bank credit and trade credit: Evidence from natural experiments. Journal of banking & finance108, 105616.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.105616
  22. Chen, X. C., Jones, S., Hasan, M. M., Zhao, R., & Alam, N. (2023). Does strategic deviation influence firms’ use of supplier finance?. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money85, 101787.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2023.101787
  23. Chod, J. (2017). Inventory, risk shifting, and trade credit. Management Science63(10), 3207-3225.‏ https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2515
  24. Chod, J., Lyandres, E., & Yang, S. A. (2019). Trade credit and supplier competition. Journal of Financial Economics131(2), 484-505.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.008
  25. Cunat, V. (2007). Trade credit: suppliers as debt collectors and insurance providers. The Review of Financial Studies20(2), 491-527.‏ https://www.jstor.org/stable/4494777
  26. Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate?. Academy of management journal39(4), 1024-1039.‏ https://doi.org/10.2307/256722
  27. Deephouse, D. L. (1999). To be different, or to be the same? It’sa question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic management journal20(2), 147-166.‏ https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2269232
  28. Ding, W., Li, X., & Zhang, G. Proprietary Costs and Relationship-based Supply Chain Collaboration.‏ https://wenzhi-ding.com/assets/paper/2022_WP_Supply_Chain_IDD.pdf
  29. D'Mello, R., & Toscano, F. (2020). Economic policy uncertainty and short-term financing: The case of trade credit. Journal of Corporate Finance64, 101686.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101686
  30. Dong, X., Chan, K. C., Cui, Y., & Guan, J. X. (2021). Strategic deviance and cash holdings. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting48(3-4), 742-782.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12487
  31. Fabbri, D., & Menichini, A. M. C. (2010). Trade credit, collateral liquidation, and borrowing constraints. Journal of Financial Economics96(3), 413-432.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.02.010
  32. Francis, J., Huang, A. H., Rajgopal, S., & Zang, A. Y. (2008). CEO reputation and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 109-147. https://doi.org/10.1506/car.25.1.4
  33. García-Teruel, P. J., & Martínez-Solano, P. (2010). A dynamic perspective on the determinants of accounts payable. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting34(4), 439-457.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-009-0124-0?urlappend=%3Futm_source%3Dresearchgate.net%26utm_medium%3Darticle
  34. Hasan, M. M., & Alam, N. (2022). Asset redeployability and trade credit. International Review of Financial Analysis80, 102024.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102024
  35. Hasan, M. M., & Habib, A. (2023). Corporate tax avoidance and trade credit. Accounting and Business Research, 54(6), 700-729.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2023.2196052
  36. Hasan, M. M., Cheung, A., Tunas, L., & Kot, H. W. (2021). Firm life cycle and trade credit. Financial Review56(4), 743-771.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.12264
  37. Hasan, M. M., Hossain, A. T., & Hossain, T. (2022). CEO inside debt holdings and trade credit. Accounting & Finance62(3), 3677-3709.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12901
  38. Huang, H., Shi, X., & Zhang, S. (2011). Counter-cyclical substitution between trade credit and bank credit. Journal of Banking & Finance35(8), 1859-1878.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.12.009
  39. Kauppi, K., Brandon‐Jones, A., van Raaij, E. M., & Matinheikki, J. (2024). “If only we'd known”: Theory of supply failure under two‐sided information asymmetry. Journal of Supply Chain Management60(1), 32-52.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12312
  40. Kerin, R. A., Varadarajan, P. R., & Peterson, R. A. (1992). First-mover advantage: A synthesis, conceptual framework, and research propositions. Journal of marketing56(4), 33-52.‏ https://doi.org/10.2307/1251985
  41. Lev, B., Radhakrishnan, S., & Zhang, W. (2009). Organization capital. Abacus45(3), 275-298.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2009.00289.x
  42. Litov, L. P., Moreton, P., & Zenger, T. R. (2012). Corporate strategy, analyst coverage, and the uniqueness paradox. Management Science58(10), 1797-1815.‏ https://www.jstor.org/stable/41686883
  43. Miller, D., & Chen, M. J. (1996). Nonconformity in competitive repertoires: A sociological view of markets. Social Forces74(4), 1209-1234.‏ https://doi.org/10.2307/2580349
  44. Molina, C. A., & Preve, L. A. (2009). Trade receivables policy of distressed firms and its effect on the costs of financial distress. Financial management38(3), 663-686.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2009.01051.x
  45. Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology36(4), 859-866.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01268.x
  46. Petersen, M. A., & Rajan, R. G. (1997). Trade credit: theories and evidence. The review of financial studies10(3), 661-691.‏ https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/10.3.661
  47. Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy. Published November74(6), 61-78.‏ https://hbr.org/1996/11/what-is-strategy
  48. Provaty, S. S., Amin, S., & Hasan, M. M. (2022). Strategic deviation and debt maturity structure. Finance Research Letters50, 103317.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103317
  49. Shang, C. (2020). Trade credit and stock liquidity. Journal of Corporate Finance62, 101586.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101586
  50. Tang, J., Crossan, M., & Rowe, W. G. (2011). Dominant CEO, deviant strategy, and extreme performance: The moderating role of a powerful board. Journal of Management Studies48(7), 1479-1503.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00985.x
  51. Titman, S., & Wessels, R. (1988). The determinants of capital structure choice. The Journal of finance43(1), 1-19.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb02585.x
  52. Whited, T. M., & Wu, G. (2006). Financial constraints risk. The review of financial studies19(2), 531-559.‏ https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhj012
  53. Wu, W., Firth, M., & Rui, O. M. (2014). Trust and the provision of trade credit. Journal of Banking & Finance39, 146-159.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.11.019
  54. Xu, H., Nguyen, D., & Dao, M. (2021). Pilot CEOs and trade credit. The european journal of finance27(6), 486-509.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2020.1816560
  55. Ye, K., Guan, J. X., & Zhang, B. (2021). Strategic deviation and stock return synchronicity. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance36(1), 172-194.‏ https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X18802551
  56. Zhang, Y., & Rajagopalan, N. (2010). Once an outsider, always an outsider? CEO origin, strategic change, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal31(3), 334-346.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.812
  57. Zhang, Z. (2019). Bank interventions and trade credit: evidence from debt covenant violations. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis54(5), 2179-2207.‏ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109018001163