Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Accounting, Faculty of Social Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

2 Department of Accounting,Faculty of Economic and administrative sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

3 Department of Accounting, Faculty of Humanities, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran

Abstract

Trade credit serves as an accessible financing tool, particularly for firms facing financial constraints. This study aimed to examine the effect of financial constraints on the relationship between strategic deviation and trade credit. The research was applied in purpose and descriptive–correlational in design, and the data were analyzed using regression techniques. The statistical population included 124 firms listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange between 2016 and 2024, yielding 1,116 firm-year observations. The findings indicated a positive and significant relationship between strategic deviation and the use of trade credit, which was stronger among firms with severe financial constraints and under high bankruptcy risk, but weaker in firms with more stable financial conditions. Multiple sensitivity analyses, including alternative measures of the independent variable, exclusion of control variables, removal of year and industry effects, and testing the model with a moderating variable across groups with varying financial constraints, consistently confirmed the main results. Overall, the results showed that strategic deviation directly influenced corporate credit policies, with greater deviation increasing reliance on trade credit, and that financial constraints could moderate this relationship.
 

Introduction

Strategic deviation within firms refers to a substantial divergence from the prevailing norms, conventions, and competitive practices of a given industry. Such deviation is not limited to superficial differences in tactics but reflects a deeper commitment to pursuing distinct strategic orientations and allocating organizational resources in unconventional ways. In many contexts, including emerging economies, these deviations are often driven by firms’ attempts to achieve differentiation, create innovative products and services, and ultimately secure new and more sustainable competitive advantages. By deliberately distancing themselves from industry routines, firms seek to overcome competitive inertia, foster innovation, and position themselves as leaders rather than followers. However, these benefits are rarely cost-neutral. Departures from industry norms typically require additional and sometimes substantial financial commitments to support experimentation, innovation, and higher levels of risk-taking. Therefore, the financing dimension of strategic deviation becomes critical, as firms must secure adequate resources to sustain their unconventional strategies. The purpose of this study is to examine whether and how strategic deviation influences firms’ reliance on trade credit as a substitute or a complementary financing source. Specifically, the research investigates whether firms that deviate more strongly from industry norms and resource allocation patterns exhibit higher usage of trade credit, and how this relationship is conditioned by the severity of financial constraints.

Literature Review

In Iran’s economic and financial environment, the financing aspect of strategic deviation takes on particular significance. The country’s capital markets remain underdeveloped relative to those of advanced economies, and bank loans constitute the dominant and often sole source of external financing for most firms. Yet access to bank credit is limited and frequently subject to strict conditions imposed by lending institutions, the financial condition of the borrowing firm, and broader macroeconomic constraints. For many corporations, these restrictions create persistent financing challenges that constrain their ability to sustain growth and implement innovative strategies. Within this context, trade credit—defined as credit extended by suppliers in the form of deferred payments—emerges as an essential alternative financing mechanism.
Trade credit is not only flexible and relational but also less dependent on collateral compared to formal bank loans, making it particularly valuable for firms facing financial constraints. Consequently, understanding how strategic deviation interacts with firms’ reliance on trade credit is an important question in both strategic management and corporate finance, particularly in emerging economies such as Iran.

Methodology

This study is applied in purpose and descriptive–correlational in method, drawing on an empirical sample of 124 non-financial firms listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange over the period 2016–2024, yielding 1,116 firm-year observations. To test the hypotheses, regression analysis techniques were employed, with trade credit measured through two widely accepted proxies: (i) the ratio of accounts payable to the cost of goods sold, and (ii) the ratio of accounts payable to total sales. Strategic deviation was operationalized through six indicators reflecting firms’ allocation of resources and financial structures: the ratio of net fixed assets to gross fixed assets, the inventory-to-sales ratio, the selling, general, and administrative expenses-to-sales ratio, the debt-to-equity ratio, the advertising expenditures-to-sales ratio, and the R&D expenditures-to-sales ratio. These variables capture multiple dimensions of deviation, from production intensity to marketing orientation and financial leverage. To ensure methodological robustness, principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to these six variables, producing a composite index of strategic deviation used in sensitivity analyses. This approach reduces multicollinearity and provides a more comprehensive representation of deviation patterns.

Results and Discussion

The empirical findings consistently demonstrate a positive and statistically significant relationship between strategic deviation and the use of trade credit. Firms that pursue greater deviation from industry conventions are more likely to depend on trade credit financing, suggesting that suppliers play a critical role in enabling unconventional strategies. Moreover, the relationship between deviation and trade credit is moderated by financial conditions: the association is stronger for firms experiencing severe financial constraints or operating under heightened bankruptcy risk, whereas the relationship weakens for firms in stronger financial positions or operating within the “safe zone.” These results indicate that trade credit serves as a crucial financing mechanism precisely when firms need it most—under conditions of resource scarcity and elevated risk. Robustness checks further reinforce these findings. The results remain consistent across multiple sensitivity analyses, including alternative measures of strategic deviation, the exclusion of control variables, the omission of year and industry fixed effects, and re-estimation across subsamples classified by financial constraints. Across all these tests, the central conclusion—that strategic deviation encourages greater reliance on trade credit—remains stable.

Conclusion

Taken together, the findings contribute several important insights. First, they highlight the pivotal role of strategic deviation in shaping short-term financing policies, particularly in environments where bank financing is limited. Second, the results underscore the substitutive role of trade credit, which allows strategically deviant firms to overcome financial barriers and continue pursuing innovation. Third, the study provides evidence from an emerging economy that broadens existing theoretical discussions in strategic management and corporate finance, which have largely been developed in advanced markets. From a managerial perspective, the findings suggest that managers of firms adopting non-traditional strategies should explicitly incorporate trade credit into their financing portfolios as a deliberate component of resource planning. Doing so not only sustains their strategic initiatives but also enhances resilience against financial shocks. From a policy-making perspective, the results highlight the need for supportive institutional frameworks that reduce structural barriers in supplier credit markets, enabling innovative firms to thrive. Ultimately, this study advances the literature by bridging strategic management and finance perspectives. It demonstrates that strategic deviation, while a driver of competitive differentiation, simultaneously creates financing challenges that can be mitigated through reliance on trade credit. By integrating insights on strategy, finance, and institutional context, the research offers a comprehensive view of how firms in emerging markets manage the tension between innovation and resource constraints.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Abdulla, Y., Dang, V. A., & Khurshed, A. (2017). Stock market listing and the use of trade credit: Evidence from public and private firms. Journal of Corporate Finance46, 391-410.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.08.004
  2. Aktas, N., De Bodt, E., Lobez, F., & Statnik, J. C. (2012). The information content of trade credit. Journal of Banking & Finance36(5), 1402-1413.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.12.001
  3. Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The journal of finance23(4), 589-609.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00843.x
  4. Atanasova, C. (2012). How do firms choose between intermediary and supplier finance?. Financial Management41(1), 207-228.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2012.01183.x
  5. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management17(1), 99-120.‏ https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  6. Bednar, M. K., Boivie, S., & Prince, N. R. (2013). Burr under the saddle: How media coverage influences strategic change. Organization Science24(3), 910-925.‏ https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0770
  7. Bentley, K. A., Omer, T. C., & Sharp, N. Y. (2013). Business strategy, financial reporting irregularities, and audit effort. Contemporary accounting research30(2), 780-817.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2012.01174.x
  8. Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. (2003). Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. The Quarterly journal of economics118(4), 1169-1208.‏ https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552775
  9. Biais, B., & Gollier, C. (1997). Trade credit and credit rationing. The review of financial studies10(4), 903-937.‏ https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/10.4.903
  10. Burkart, M., & Ellingsen, T. (2004). In-kind finance: A theory of trade credit. American economic review94(3), 569-590.‏ https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/0002828041464579
  11. Carpenter, M. A. (2000). The price of change: The role of CEO compensation in strategic variation and deviation from industry strategy norms. Journal of Management26(6), 1179-1198.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(00)00078-7
  12. Chen, D., Liu, M., Ma, T., & Martin, X. (2017). Accounting quality and trade credit. Accounting Horizons31(3), 69-83.‏ https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51711
  13. Chen, S., Ma, H., & Wu, Q. (2019). Bank credit and trade credit: Evidence from natural experiments. Journal of banking & finance108, 105616.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.105616
  14. Chen, X. C., Jones, S., Hasan, M. M., Zhao, R., & Alam, N. (2023). Does strategic deviation influence firms’ use of supplier finance?. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money85, 101787.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2023.101787
  15. Chod, J. (2017). Inventory, risk shifting, and trade credit. Management Science63(10), 3207-3225.‏ https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2515
  16. Chod, J., Lyandres, E., & Yang, S. A. (2019). Trade credit and supplier competition. Journal of Financial Economics131(2), 484-505.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.008
  17. Cunat, V. (2007). Trade credit: suppliers as debt collectors and insurance providers. The Review of Financial Studies20(2), 491-527.‏ https://www.jstor.org/stable/4494777
  18. Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate?. Academy of management journal39(4), 1024-1039.‏ https://doi.org/10.2307/256722
  19. Deephouse, D. L. (1999). To be different, or to be the same? It’sa question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic management journal20(2), 147-166.‏ https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2269232
  20. Ding, W., Li, X., & Zhang, G. Proprietary Costs and Relationship-based Supply Chain Collaboration.‏ https://wenzhi-ding.com/assets/paper/2022_WP_Supply_Chain_IDD.pdf
  21. D'Mello, R., & Toscano, F. (2020). Economic policy uncertainty and short-term financing: The case of trade credit. Journal of Corporate Finance64, 101686.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101686
  22. Dong, X., Chan, K. C., Cui, Y., & Guan, J. X. (2021). Strategic deviance and cash holdings. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting48(3-4), 742-782.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12487
  23. Fabbri, D., & Menichini, A. M. C. (2010). Trade credit, collateral liquidation, and borrowing constraints. Journal of Financial Economics96(3), 413-432.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.02.010
  24. Francis, J., Huang, A. H., Rajgopal, S., & Zang, A. Y. (2008). CEO reputation and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 109-147. https://doi.org/10.1506/car.25.1.4
  25. García-Teruel, P. J., & Martínez-Solano, P. (2010). A dynamic perspective on the determinants of accounts payable. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting34(4), 439-457.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-009-0124-0?urlappend=%3Futm_source%3Dresearchgate.net%26utm_medium%3Darticle
  26. Hasan, M. M., & Alam, N. (2022). Asset redeployability and trade credit. International Review of Financial Analysis80, 102024.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102024
  27. Hasan, M. M., & Habib, A. (2023). Corporate tax avoidance and trade credit. Accounting and Business Research, 54(6), 700-729.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2023.2196052
  28. Hasan, M. M., Cheung, A., Tunas, L., & Kot, H. W. (2021). Firm life cycle and trade credit. Financial Review56(4), 743-771.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.12264
  29. Hasan, M. M., Hossain, A. T., & Hossain, T. (2022). CEO inside debt holdings and trade credit. Accounting & Finance62(3), 3677-3709.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12901
  30. Huang, H., Shi, X., & Zhang, S. (2011). Counter-cyclical substitution between trade credit and bank credit. Journal of Banking & Finance35(8), 1859-1878.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.12.009
  31. Kauppi, K., Brandon‐Jones, A., van Raaij, E. M., & Matinheikki, J. (2024). “If only we'd known”: Theory of supply failure under two‐sided information asymmetry. Journal of Supply Chain Management60(1), 32-52.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12312
  32. Kerin, R. A., Varadarajan, P. R., & Peterson, R. A. (1992). First-mover advantage: A synthesis, conceptual framework, and research propositions. Journal of marketing56(4), 33-52.‏ https://doi.org/10.2307/1251985
  33. Lev, B., Radhakrishnan, S., & Zhang, W. (2009). Organization capital. Abacus45(3), 275-298.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2009.00289.x
  34. Litov, L. P., Moreton, P., & Zenger, T. R. (2012). Corporate strategy, analyst coverage, and the uniqueness paradox. Management Science58(10), 1797-1815.‏ https://www.jstor.org/stable/41686883
  35. Miller, D., & Chen, M. J. (1996). Nonconformity in competitive repertoires: A sociological view of markets. Social Forces74(4), 1209-1234.‏ https://doi.org/10.2307/2580349
  36. Molina, C. A., & Preve, L. A. (2009). Trade receivables policy of distressed firms and its effect on the costs of financial distress. Financial management38(3), 663-686.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2009.01051.x
  37. Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology36(4), 859-866.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01268.x
  38. Petersen, M. A., & Rajan, R. G. (1997). Trade credit: theories and evidence. The review of financial studies10(3), 661-691.‏ https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/10.3.661
  39. Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy. Published November74(6), 61-78.‏ https://hbr.org/1996/11/what-is-strategy
  40. Provaty, S. S., Amin, S., & Hasan, M. M. (2022). Strategic deviation and debt maturity structure. Finance Research Letters50, 103317.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103317
  41. Shang, C. (2020). Trade credit and stock liquidity. Journal of Corporate Finance62, 101586.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101586
  42. Tang, J., Crossan, M., & Rowe, W. G. (2011). Dominant CEO, deviant strategy, and extreme performance: The moderating role of a powerful board. Journal of Management Studies48(7), 1479-1503.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00985.x
  43. Titman, S., & Wessels, R. (1988). The determinants of capital structure choice. The Journal of finance43(1), 1-19.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb02585.x
  44. Whited, T. M., & Wu, G. (2006). Financial constraints risk. The review of financial studies19(2), 531-559.‏ https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhj012
  45. Wu, W., Firth, M., & Rui, O. M. (2014). Trust and the provision of trade credit. Journal of Banking & Finance39, 146-159.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.11.019
  46. Xu, H., Nguyen, D., & Dao, M. (2021). Pilot CEOs and trade credit. The european journal of finance27(6), 486-509.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2020.1816560
  47. Ye, K., Guan, J. X., & Zhang, B. (2021). Strategic deviation and stock return synchronicity. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance36(1), 172-194.‏ https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X18802551
  48. Zhang, Y., & Rajagopalan, N. (2010). Once an outsider, always an outsider? CEO origin, strategic change, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal31(3), 334-346.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.812
  49. Zhang, Z. (2019). Bank interventions and trade credit: evidence from debt covenant violations. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis54(5), 2179-2207.‏ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109018001163
  50. Aflatooni, A. (2019). Econometrics in accounting and finance using Eviews. Tehran, Termeh. https://www.termehbook.com/product/9789649786698/ [In Persian]
  51. Aflatooni, A., & Norouzi, M. (2020). Determinants of Supply of and Demand for Trade Credit: Static and Dynamic Approaches. Journal of Accounting Knowledge11(1), 35-59. doi: 10.22103/jak.2020.13295.2879 [In Persian]
  52. Ebrahimi, J., & Amiri, E. (2025). The impact of earnings management on the relationship between managerial ability and debt choice. Financial Accounting Knowledge12(1), 59-80. doi: 10.30479/jfak.2025.21325.3259 [In Persian]
  53. Khajavi, S., Ghayouri Moghadam, A., & Hajeb, H. R. (2021). Investigating the Effect of Trade Credit on Cost Stickiness. Financial Accounting Knowledge8(3), 125-141. doi: 10.30479/jfak.2021.15556.2869 [In Persian]
  54. Moradi, M., & Sepahvandi, S. (2015). The Impact of Competitive Strategies on Stability of Financial Performance and Risk. Financial Accounting Research7(3), 90-75. far.ui.ac.ir/article_17053.html [In Persian]
  55. Rahmanian Koushkaki, A., & Vahdan Asl, S. (2025). The Impact of Fixed Asset Investment and Financial Performance on the Relationship between Social Responsibility and Debt Financing. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting22(87), 267-304. doi: 10.22054/qjma.2025.83762.2646 [In Persian]
  56. Rezaei Pitenoei, Y. (2026). Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Trade Credit Financing. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjma.2026.88586.2720 [In Persian]
  57. Taheri, M., & Ghobadi Aski, S. (2023). Strategic Deviance Impact on Auditor Quality and Its Consequences in Companies Listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Accounting and Auditing Review30(3), 506-531. doi: 10.22059/acctgrev.2023.347559.1008715 [In Persian]