نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد حسابداری مدیریت، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران

2 استادیار حسابداری، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران

3 دانشیار حسابداری، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران

چکیده

رسوایی‌ها و بحران‌های مالی مشاهده شده در اغلب کشورها به سبب دستکاری نمودن گزارش‌های مالی، منجر به عدم اعتماد سرمایه‌گذاران و ذی‌نفعان نسبت به اطلاعات مالی شده است. عدم اعتماد از جانب ذی‌نفعان نسبت به گزارش‌های مالی و عدم برخورداری جریانات اقتصادی از کیفیت لازم، می‌تواند عاملی بازدارنده در جذب سرمایه‌گذاران باشد. در پژوهش حاضر، اطلاعات مربوط به 148 شرکت پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران طی بازه زمانی 12 ساله از سال 1391 تا 1402 مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. در رابطه با آزمون فرضیه‌ها، طی فرآیندی اطلاعات گردآوری شده به 11 گروه مجزا طبقه-بندی شدند. جهت سنجش هرگونه آراستگی در رابطه با رندکردن یا گردکردن ارقام سود طی دوره-های چرخه عمر از توزیع بنفورد استفاده شده است. برای بررسی و مقایسه فراوانی‌های مشاهده شده (واقعی) ارقام سود با فراوانی‌های مورد انتظار (توزیع بنفورد)، آزمون کای‌دو مورد استفاده قرار خواهد گرفت. نتایج پژوهش حاکی از آن است که در شرکت‌های با کیفیت حسابرسی بالا و پایین در هر سه دوره چرخه عمر نظیر؛ رشد، بلوغ و افول، فراوانی‌های مشاهده شده (واقعی) و فراوانی‌های مورد انتظار (توزیع بنفورد)، اختلاف معناداری وجود ندارد و ارقام سود در تمام مراحل مورد بررسی پژوهش از توزیع بنفورد تبعیت می‌نمایند، لذا فاقد آراستگی در ارقام سود می‌باشند. در پژوهش‌های آتی پیشنهاد می‌شود مطالعه حاضر به تفکیک صنایع و با شاخص‌های اندازه‌گیری دیگری چون چرخش حسابرس، دوره تصدی و اندازه حسابرس به عنوان معیار کیفیت حسابرسی انجام گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Life Cycle and Cosmetic Earnings Management: The Moderating Role of Audit Quality

نویسندگان [English]

  • Omid Tarast 1
  • Farzad Ghayour 2
  • Parviz Piri 3

1 Master of management Accounting, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

2 Assistant Prof of Accounting, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

3 Associate Prof of Accounting, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

چکیده [English]

Financial scandals and crises observed in many countries as a result of the manipulation of financial reports have led to a loss of trust among investors and stakeholders in financial information. This lack of trust in financial reporting and the low quality of financial information flows can act as a deterrent to attracting investment. In the present study, data from 148 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange over a 12-year period (2012-2023) were analyzed. For hypothesis testing, the collected data were classified into 11 distinct groups. To assess cosmetic earnings management related to the rounding of earnings figures across life cycle stages, Benford's Law was applied. The Chi-square test was used to compare the observed (actual) frequencies of earnings figures with the expected frequencies based on Benford’s distribution. The findings indicate that for both high- and low-audit-quality companies, across all three life cycle stages—growth, maturity, and decline—there is no statistically significant difference between the observed and expected frequencies. Therefore, the earnings figures in all examined stages conform to Benford's distribution and show no signs of cosmetic earnings management. Future research is encouraged to conduct similar analyses at the industry level and to incorporate additional audit quality indicators, such as auditor turnover, auditor tenure, and auditor size

Introduction

Investors, who are the economic pulse of the financial industry, seek to be fully and transparently informed about the developments and events occurring in business units. Benford distribution (1938) can be considered one of the tools used to evaluate financial reports.
Benford’s distribution is an analytical process that compares actual results with expected results to identify abnormal transactions. This distribution, also known as the first-digit law, is a type of empirical observation that states that the first digits in many numerical data sets are distributed in a specific, non-uniform manner. In other words, Benford’s distribution indicates that, for each digit position (from the first to the fourth digit), the probabilities of the digits one through nine are unequal, and lower digits occur more frequently than higher digits. Therefore, the probability of smaller digits appearing in the leading position is higher than that of larger digits.
The rounding of financial figures often occurs when the observed distribution of numbers deviates slightly from the expected distribution. Any manipulation of figures, if carried out deliberately, can be considered a self-serving behavior, although such actions may serve the interests of the business unit or certain individuals. In view of the above, the purpose of this study is to investigate the extent to which profit figures of firms listed on the Iranian stock exchange are trimmed to achieve rounding aligned with managers’ personal interests. In line with the objectives of the research, the following questions are raised: Does high or low audit quality affect the extent to which profit figures are trimmed? Across the different life cycle stages under study, does profit trimming occur when audit quality is present or absent?

Literature Review

The Benford distribution was first introduced by Simon Newcomb (1881), an American mathematician who discovered a pattern in logarithmic tables. At that time, academics did not pay attention to Newcomb's research, and it was not until Frank Benford (1938), a physicist at General Electric, that this phenomenon was revisited and formally examined. Benford examined a set of natural data (20,229 randomly selected observations) such as baseball statistics, death rates, stock market prices, atomic weights in chemical compounds, Fibonacci numbers, river lengths and lake areas, urban population and census data, books and magazines, and similar datasets. Finally, he confirmed the distribution observed by Simon Newcomb, showing that in numerical data, there is a tendency toward smaller leading digits, and the repetition of the digits one and two is more frequent than that of the digits eight and nine. Following increased academic interest, this distribution was officially named and became known as the Benford distribution. However, research in this area did not progress as expected until Roger Pinkham (1961), a professor of mathematics, provided a mathematical proof of this phenomenon. Subsequently, the American mathematician Hill (1995) theoretically demonstrated, using a form of the influential central limit theorem in statistics, that the first digit follows this principle (Benford distribution). Based on his studies, Hill found that if the distribution of digits occurs randomly and random samples are extracted from that distribution, the resulting distribution will converge toward the logarithmic distribution (Benford's law), which can also assist in the interpretation and prediction of digital patterns.
Motivations related to profit embellishment in Iranian business units may differ from those in Western countries (Pourheidari and Hemmati, 2004). In studies conducted by He and Gan (2014) on the financial reports of Japanese business units, they found that applying Benford's law to profit and income accounts revealed that profit embellishment differs across industries, and that profit embellishment is more pronounced than income embellishment. In a study by Lennox et al. (2018), the authors examined profit embellishment, auditor adjustments, and the financing of business units, focusing on the magnitude of auditors' profit adjustments during financing events. They found that in the pre-financing stage, the magnitude of auditor adjustments that reduce reported profits is significantly large.

Methodology

The present study can be considered an applied study in terms of its purpose. The information was extracted using a purposive sampling method. This study seeks to design a model based on empirical observations, and the data used in the study are quantitative. The present study seeks a general result; therefore, it is both deductive and inductive in terms of the type of reasoning and conclusion. The present study covers all business units listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange during the period from 2012 to 2023, and accordingly, the final sample was selected using the systematic elimination method.

Results

The first main hypothesis states that the life cycle stages (growth, maturity, and decline) have a significant effect on the utilitarian neatness of the profit figures of business units. To test this hypothesis, given that it must be examined across three stages (growth, maturity, and decline), the analysis was conductedseperately for each stage. The first sub-hypothesis states that in the growth stage, there is no neatness in profit figures, and the distribution of companies' profit figures follows the Benford distribution. The results of the first sub-hypothesis indicate that the significance level for the second digit of profit figures is less than 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis, which states that there is no significant difference between the actual (observed) frequency and the expected frequency, is rejected. The significance level for the first, third, and fourth digits of profit figures is greater than 0.05, indicating that there is no significant difference between the actual frequency and the expected frequency. In addition, the test statistic for the second digit is higher than those for the first, third, and fourth digits. Therefore, the first sub-hypothesis is accepted.

Discussion

The results obtained from the hypothesis tests indicate that these findings differ from those of studies conducted in other parts of the world. Although the results of the current study indicate a lack of order in the profit figures of units listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange during the period from 2012 to 2014, it is not possible to state with complete certainty that there is a lack of order in these companies, as this phenomenon may manifest differently across industries and to varying degrees.

Conclusion

The existence of a phenomenon called rounding in the profit figures of business units during their life cycles is not supported by the Chi-square test. The results obtained indicate the absence of profit tidying by management in the profit figures of the sample under study. The results of the research also show that audit quality (high and low) has no effect on the presence or absence of tidying, and that no tidying is observed in the profit figures across different stages of the life cycle.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Audit Quality
  • Benford’s Law
  • Cosmetic Earnings Management
  • Life Cycle
  1. اثنی­عشری، حمیده، صفرزاده‌بندری، محمدحسین و رضایی نماور، حسین. (1399). آراستگی منفعت‌طلبانه ارقام سود (زیان) و بدهی با تأکید بر نقش نظام راهبری شرکتی. پیشرفت­های حسابداری دانشگاه شیراز، 12(2)، 1-26. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌ 10.22099/‌JAA.2020.35676.1959
  2. اخلاقی یزدی نژاد، اسماعیل؛ صفی پور افشار، مجتبی و نورانی، حسین. (1399). بررسی و مقایسه کیفیت حسابرسی مؤسسات حسابرسی بزرگ و کوچک با استفاده از قانون بنفورد. دانش حسابرسی. 20 (80)، 5 – 2https:/‌/‌ensani.ir/‌fa/‌article/‌444852
  3. ایزدی نیا، ناصر، کیانی، غلامحسین و میرزائی، مهدی. (1394). تأثیر ویژگی­هـای مراحل چرخه عمر شـرکت بـر عدم تقـارن زمانی جریـان نقدی عملیاتی شـرکت­های پذیرفته‌شده در بـورس اوراق بهـادار تهران. دانش حسابرسی، 15(59)، 57-76. http:/‌/‌ensani.ir/‌fa/‌article/‌350436
  4. پورحیدری، امید و همتی، داود. (1383). بررسی اثر قراردادهای بدهی، بدهی سیاسی، طرح­های پاداش و مالکیت بر سود در شرکت­های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. بررسی­های حسابداری و حسابرسی، 11(36)، 47-63.  https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌ 20.1001.1.26458020.1383.11.2.5.7
  5. تقوی­فردود، وحید، برادران حسن­زاده، رسول و محمدی، احمد. (1399). توانایی الگوهای چرخه عمر شرکت در تبیین انعطاف پذیری مالی. چشم انداز مدیریت مالی. 10(32)، 159-188.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.52547/‌JFMP.10.32.15
  6. حکمت، هانیه و حیدرزاده­خلیفه­کندی، وحید؛ قربانی، راضیه (1403). نقش تعدیلگری محافظه‌کاری بر ارتباط بین کیفیت حسابرسی و مدیریت سود، مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی. 21 (83)، 121-162. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.22054/‌qjma.2024.79187.2555
  7. خدامی­پور، احمد، محمدرضاخانی، وحید و هوشمندزعفرانیه، رحمت­اله. (1392). بررسی تأثیر ویژگی­های کیفی حسابرسی بر هزینه حقوق صاحبان سهام. تحقیقات حسابداری و حسابرسی، 5(20)، 108-121. http:/‌/‌ensani.ir/‌fa/‌article/‌350436
  8. داغانی، رضا، حاجیان، نجمه و طلوعی، کبری. (1398). تأثیر ساختار مالکیتی و نظارتی هیئت‌مدیره و ویژگی‌های حسابرس بر مدیریت سود. پژوهش‌های تجربی حسابداری 9(4)، 299-326. doi: 10.22051/‌jera.2018.20138.2019
  9. ستایش، محمدحسین، مسعودی، یونس، دهداری، الیاس و صادقی، مینا. (1403). تأثیر حسابداری ذهنی بر کیفیت حسابرسی. مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی. 21 (83). 1-42.doi: 10.22054/‌qjma.2024.79615.2567
  10. شمس­الدینی، کاظم و دانشی، وحید. (1397). توانایی قانون بنفورد در کشف تقلب در دو صورت سود یا زیان و ترازنامه. دانش حسابرسی، 18(73)، 167-186. http:/‌/‌ensani.ir/‌fa/‌article/‌350436
  11. علوی­طبری، سید حسین و باکری، آمنه. (1390). مدیریت سود به‌منظور دستیابی به نقاط مبنا. پژوهش­های حسابداری مالی، 3(3)، 1-18. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌1001.1.23223405.1390.3.3.1.4
  12. وقفی، سیدحسام و دارابی، رؤیا. (1396). کاربرد قانون بنفورد در تحلیل درماندگی مالی شرکت­های دولتی. حسابداری دولتی، 4 (1)، 59-72. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌1001.1.24234613.1396.4.1.5.1
  13. محمدی، حمید، صالحی راد، معصومه و حاجی زاده، سعید. (1390). شناسایی مدیریت آرایشی سود با استفاده از قانون بنفورد. دانش حسابرسی، 11(45)، 457-478. http:/‌/‌ensani.ir/‌fa/‌article/‌350436
  14. محمودی، سیاوش و محمودی، سعید. (1404). دستکاری سود و قانون بنفورد: بررسی شرکت‌های موجود در صنایع مختلف بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. تحقیقات حسابداری و حسابرسی. 17(65)، 139-158. doi: 10.22034/‌iaar.2025.222688
  15. Anthony, J. H., & Ramesh, K. (1992). Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices: A test of the life cycle hypothesis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15(2-3), 203-227. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌0165-4101(92)90018-W
  16. Azizkhani, M., Daghani, R., & Shailer, G. (2018). Audit firm tenure and audit quality in a constrained market. The International Journal of Accounting, 53(3), 167-182. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.intacc.2018.07.002
  17. Bakarich, M. Kathleen, M.H., & Weintrop, J. (2019). Di_erent time, di_erent tone: Company life cycle. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 15(1), 69–86. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jcae.2018.12.002.
  18. Bader, A. A., & Saleh, M. M. A. (2017). Evidence on the Extent of Cosmetic Earnings and Revenues Management by Jordanian Companies. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(3), 20-30. https:/‌/‌www.econjournals.com/‌index.php/‌ijefi/‌article/‌view/‌4370
  19. Benford, F. (1938). The Law of Anomalous Numbers, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 78, 551-572.
  20. Can, G. (2020). Do Life-Cycles Affect Financial Reporting Quality? Evidence from Emerging Market. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1854147. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1080/‌23311975.2020.1854147.
  21. Dickinson, V. (2011). Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life cycle. The Accounting Review, 86 (6), 1964-1994. http:/‌/‌dx.doi.org/‌10.2139/‌ssrn.1268509.
  22. Guan, L., He, D., & Yang, D. (2006). Auditing, integral approach to quarterly reporting, and cosmetic earnings management. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21, 569-581. https:/‌/‌ doi:10.1108/‌02686900610674861.
  23. He, D., & Guan, L. (2014). Rounding phenomenon in reported earnings and revenues: evidence from Japan. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 22(1), 68-79. https:/‌/‌doi:10.1108/‌IJAIM-09-2012-0055.
  24. Hill, T. (1995). The significant-digit phenomenon. American Mathematical Monthly, 102(4), 322-327. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1080/‌00029890.1995.11990578
  25. Kang, N., & Jin, J. (2013). Rounding reported earnings numbers and firm characteristics in Korea. Pan-Pacific Journal of Business Research, 4(2), 18-32. DOI: 10.1108/‌IJAIM-09-2012-0055
  26. Keefe, T.B., King, R.D., & Gaver, K.M., (1994). Audit fees, industry specialization, and compliance with GAAS reporting standards. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 13(2), 41-55. https:/‌/‌www.econbiz.de/‌Record/‌audit-fees-industry-specialization-and-compliance-with-gaas-reporting-standards-keefe-terrence/‌10007013339
  27. Kuruppu, N. (2019). The application of Benford’s Law in fraud detection: a systematic methodology. International Business Research12(10), 1-10.‏ DOI:10.5539/‌ibr.v12n10p1
  28. Lennox, C., Wang, Z. T., & Wu, X. (2018). Earnings management, audit adjustments, and the financing of corporate acquisitions: evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 65(1), 21-40.DOI: 10.1016/‌j.jacceco.2017.11.011
  29. Lin, F., & Hsieh, C.H. (2012). Applying digital analysis to detect fraud: an empirical analysis of US marine industry. Applied Economics. 45, 135–140. DOI:10.1080/‌00036846.2011.605759.
  30. Lowensohn, S., & Reck, J., (2004). Longitudinal analysis of local government audit quality. Research in Governmental and NonProfit Accounting, 11, 213-228. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌S0884-0741(04)11010-0
  31. Mohammadi, H., Salehi rad, M & Hajizadeh, S. (2012). Recognitoin cosmetics earnings management using Benford’s Law. Journal of Audit Science, 11(45), 457-478.‏ http:/‌/‌ensani.ir/‌fa/‌article/‌350436
  32. Niskanen, J., & Keloharju, M. (2000). Earnings cosmetics in a tax-driven accounting environment: evidence from Finnish public firms. European Accounting Review, 9(3), 443-452.‏ DOI:10.1080/‌09638180020017159
  33. Newcomb, s. (1881). Note on the Frequency of use of the Different Digits in Natural Numbers. American Journal of Mathematics, 4, 39-40. https:/‌/‌pdodds.w3.uvm.edu/‌files/‌papers/‌others/‌1881/‌newcomb1881a.pdf
  34. Othman, R., Ameer, R., & Laswad, F. (2019). Forensic auditing tools in detecting financial statements' irregularities: Benford's Law and Beneish Model in the case of Toshiba. In Organizational Auditing and Assurance in the Digital Age (pp. 256-275). IGI Global.‏ DOI:10.4018/‌978-1-5225-7356-2.ch013
  35. Özarı, Ç., & Ocak, M. (2013). Detection of earnings management by applying Benford’s Law in selected accounts: Evidence from quarterly financial statements of Turkish public companies. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences59(4), 37-52.‏ https:/‌/‌www.researchgate.net/‌publication/‌270278179
  36. Pinkham, R. (1961). On the Distribution of First Significant Digits, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(4), 1223–1230. https:/‌/‌web.williams.edu/‌Mathematics/‌sjmiller/‌public_html/‌BrownClasses/‌197/‌benford/‌Pinkham_FirstDigit.pdf
  37. Sharf, N., & Abu Nassar, M. (2021). The Effect of Audit Quality and Auditor's Opinion on Earnings Management: Evidence from Jordan. Jordan Journal of Business Administration17(2).‏ 236-253. https:/‌/‌www.researchgate.net/‌publication/‌378342790
  38. Shette, R., & Kuntluru, S. (2014). Rounding-up in reported income numbers: Evidence from Indian companies. Review of Accounting and Finance, 13(2), 156-170. DOI:10.1108/‌RAF-04-2013-0042
  39. Van Caneghem, T. (2002). Earnings management induced by cognitive reference points. British Accounting Review, 34(2), 167-178. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1006/‌bare.2002.0190
  40. Van De Ven, A.H., & Poole, M.S., (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510–540. http:/‌/‌dx.doi.org/‌10.2307/‌258786