Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Master of management Accounting, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

2 Assistant Prof of Accounting, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

3 Associate Prof of Accounting, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

Abstract

Financial scandals and crises observed in many countries as a result of the manipulation of financial reports have led to a loss of trust among investors and stakeholders in financial information. This lack of trust in financial reporting and the low quality of financial information flows can act as a deterrent to attracting investment. In the present study, data from 148 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange over a 12-year period (2012-2023) were analyzed. For hypothesis testing, the collected data were classified into 11 distinct groups. To assess cosmetic earnings management related to the rounding of earnings figures across life cycle stages, Benford's Law was applied. The Chi-square test was used to compare the observed (actual) frequencies of earnings figures with the expected frequencies based on Benford’s distribution. The findings indicate that for both high- and low-audit-quality companies, across all three life cycle stages—growth, maturity, and decline—there is no statistically significant difference between the observed and expected frequencies. Therefore, the earnings figures in all examined stages conform to Benford's distribution and show no signs of cosmetic earnings management. Future research is encouraged to conduct similar analyses at the industry level and to incorporate additional audit quality indicators, such as auditor turnover, auditor tenure, and auditor size

Introduction

Investors, who are the economic pulse of the financial industry, seek to be fully and transparently informed about the developments and events occurring in business units. Benford distribution (1938) can be considered one of the tools used to evaluate financial reports.
Benford’s distribution is an analytical process that compares actual results with expected results to identify abnormal transactions. This distribution, also known as the first-digit law, is a type of empirical observation that states that the first digits in many numerical data sets are distributed in a specific, non-uniform manner. In other words, Benford’s distribution indicates that, for each digit position (from the first to the fourth digit), the probabilities of the digits one through nine are unequal, and lower digits occur more frequently than higher digits. Therefore, the probability of smaller digits appearing in the leading position is higher than that of larger digits.
The rounding of financial figures often occurs when the observed distribution of numbers deviates slightly from the expected distribution. Any manipulation of figures, if carried out deliberately, can be considered a self-serving behavior, although such actions may serve the interests of the business unit or certain individuals. In view of the above, the purpose of this study is to investigate the extent to which profit figures of firms listed on the Iranian stock exchange are trimmed to achieve rounding aligned with managers’ personal interests. In line with the objectives of the research, the following questions are raised: Does high or low audit quality affect the extent to which profit figures are trimmed? Across the different life cycle stages under study, does profit trimming occur when audit quality is present or absent?

Literature Review

The Benford distribution was first introduced by Simon Newcomb (1881), an American mathematician who discovered a pattern in logarithmic tables. At that time, academics did not pay attention to Newcomb's research, and it was not until Frank Benford (1938), a physicist at General Electric, that this phenomenon was revisited and formally examined. Benford examined a set of natural data (20,229 randomly selected observations) such as baseball statistics, death rates, stock market prices, atomic weights in chemical compounds, Fibonacci numbers, river lengths and lake areas, urban population and census data, books and magazines, and similar datasets. Finally, he confirmed the distribution observed by Simon Newcomb, showing that in numerical data, there is a tendency toward smaller leading digits, and the repetition of the digits one and two is more frequent than that of the digits eight and nine. Following increased academic interest, this distribution was officially named and became known as the Benford distribution. However, research in this area did not progress as expected until Roger Pinkham (1961), a professor of mathematics, provided a mathematical proof of this phenomenon. Subsequently, the American mathematician Hill (1995) theoretically demonstrated, using a form of the influential central limit theorem in statistics, that the first digit follows this principle (Benford distribution). Based on his studies, Hill found that if the distribution of digits occurs randomly and random samples are extracted from that distribution, the resulting distribution will converge toward the logarithmic distribution (Benford's law), which can also assist in the interpretation and prediction of digital patterns.
Motivations related to profit embellishment in Iranian business units may differ from those in Western countries (Pourheidari and Hemmati, 2004). In studies conducted by He and Gan (2014) on the financial reports of Japanese business units, they found that applying Benford's law to profit and income accounts revealed that profit embellishment differs across industries, and that profit embellishment is more pronounced than income embellishment. In a study by Lennox et al. (2018), the authors examined profit embellishment, auditor adjustments, and the financing of business units, focusing on the magnitude of auditors' profit adjustments during financing events. They found that in the pre-financing stage, the magnitude of auditor adjustments that reduce reported profits is significantly large.

Methodology

The present study can be considered an applied study in terms of its purpose. The information was extracted using a purposive sampling method. This study seeks to design a model based on empirical observations, and the data used in the study are quantitative. The present study seeks a general result; therefore, it is both deductive and inductive in terms of the type of reasoning and conclusion. The present study covers all business units listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange during the period from 2012 to 2023, and accordingly, the final sample was selected using the systematic elimination method.

Results

The first main hypothesis states that the life cycle stages (growth, maturity, and decline) have a significant effect on the utilitarian neatness of the profit figures of business units. To test this hypothesis, given that it must be examined across three stages (growth, maturity, and decline), the analysis was conductedseperately for each stage. The first sub-hypothesis states that in the growth stage, there is no neatness in profit figures, and the distribution of companies' profit figures follows the Benford distribution. The results of the first sub-hypothesis indicate that the significance level for the second digit of profit figures is less than 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis, which states that there is no significant difference between the actual (observed) frequency and the expected frequency, is rejected. The significance level for the first, third, and fourth digits of profit figures is greater than 0.05, indicating that there is no significant difference between the actual frequency and the expected frequency. In addition, the test statistic for the second digit is higher than those for the first, third, and fourth digits. Therefore, the first sub-hypothesis is accepted.

Discussion

The results obtained from the hypothesis tests indicate that these findings differ from those of studies conducted in other parts of the world. Although the results of the current study indicate a lack of order in the profit figures of units listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange during the period from 2012 to 2014, it is not possible to state with complete certainty that there is a lack of order in these companies, as this phenomenon may manifest differently across industries and to varying degrees.

Conclusion

The existence of a phenomenon called rounding in the profit figures of business units during their life cycles is not supported by the Chi-square test. The results obtained indicate the absence of profit tidying by management in the profit figures of the sample under study. The results of the research also show that audit quality (high and low) has no effect on the presence or absence of tidying, and that no tidying is observed in the profit figures across different stages of the life cycle.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Anthony, J. H., & Ramesh, K. (1992). Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices: A test of the life cycle hypothesis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15(2-3), 203-227. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌0165-4101(92)90018-W
  2. Azizkhani, M., Daghani, R., & Shailer, G. (2018). Audit firm tenure and audit quality in a constrained market. The International Journal of Accounting, 53(3), 167-182. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.intacc.2018.07.002
  3. Bakarich, M. Kathleen, M.H., & Weintrop, J. (2019). Di_erent time, di_erent tone: Company life cycle. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 15(1), 69–86. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jcae.2018.12.002.
  4. Bader, A. A., & Saleh, M. M. A. (2017). Evidence on the Extent of Cosmetic Earnings and Revenues Management by Jordanian Companies. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(3), 20-30. https:/‌/‌www.econjournals.com/‌index.php/‌ijefi/‌article/‌view/‌4370
  5. Benford, F. (1938). The Law of Anomalous Numbers, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 78, 551-572.
  6. Can, G. (2020). Do Life-Cycles Affect Financial Reporting Quality? Evidence from Emerging Market. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1854147. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1080/‌23311975.2020.1854147.
  7. Dickinson, V. (2011). Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life cycle. The Accounting Review, 86 (6), 1964-1994. http:/‌/‌dx.doi.org/‌10.2139/‌ssrn.1268509.
  8. Guan, L., He, D., & Yang, D. (2006). Auditing, integral approach to quarterly reporting, and cosmetic earnings management. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21, 569-581. https:/‌/‌ doi:10.1108/‌02686900610674861.
  9. He, D., & Guan, L. (2014). Rounding phenomenon in reported earnings and revenues: evidence from Japan. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 22(1), 68-79. https:/‌/‌doi:10.1108/‌IJAIM-09-2012-0055.
  10. Hill, T. (1995). The significant-digit phenomenon. American Mathematical Monthly, 102(4), 322-327. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1080/‌00029890.1995.11990578
  11. Kang, N., & Jin, J. (2013). Rounding reported earnings numbers and firm characteristics in Korea. Pan-Pacific Journal of Business Research, 4(2), 18-32. DOI: 10.1108/‌IJAIM-09-2012-0055
  12. Keefe, T.B., King, R.D., & Gaver, K.M., (1994). Audit fees, industry specialization, and compliance with GAAS reporting standards. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 13(2), 41-55. https:/‌/‌www.econbiz.de/‌Record/‌audit-fees-industry-specialization-and-compliance-with-gaas-reporting-standards-keefe-terrence/‌10007013339
  13. Kuruppu, N. (2019). The application of Benford’s Law in fraud detection: a systematic methodology. International Business Research12(10), 1-10.‏ DOI:10.5539/‌ibr.v12n10p1
  14. Lennox, C., Wang, Z. T., & Wu, X. (2018). Earnings management, audit adjustments, and the financing of corporate acquisitions: evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 65(1), 21-40.DOI: 10.1016/‌j.jacceco.2017.11.011
  15. Lin, F., & Hsieh, C.H. (2012). Applying digital analysis to detect fraud: an empirical analysis of US marine industry. Applied Economics. 45, 135–140. DOI:10.1080/‌00036846.2011.605759.
  16. Lowensohn, S., & Reck, J., (2004). Longitudinal analysis of local government audit quality. Research in Governmental and NonProfit Accounting, 11, 213-228. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌S0884-0741(04)11010-0
  17. Mohammadi, H., Salehi rad, M & Hajizadeh, S. (2012). Recognitoin cosmetics earnings management using Benford’s Law. Journal of Audit Science, 11(45), 457-478.‏ http:/‌/‌ensani.ir/‌fa/‌article/‌350436
  18. Niskanen, J., & Keloharju, M. (2000). Earnings cosmetics in a tax-driven accounting environment: evidence from Finnish public firms. European Accounting Review, 9(3), 443-452.‏ DOI:10.1080/‌09638180020017159
  19. Newcomb, s. (1881). Note on the Frequency of use of the Different Digits in Natural Numbers. American Journal of Mathematics, 4, 39-40. https:/‌/‌pdodds.w3.uvm.edu/‌files/‌papers/‌others/‌1881/‌newcomb1881a.pdf
  20. Othman, R., Ameer, R., & Laswad, F. (2019). Forensic auditing tools in detecting financial statements' irregularities: Benford's Law and Beneish Model in the case of Toshiba. In Organizational Auditing and Assurance in the Digital Age (pp. 256-275). IGI Global.‏ DOI:10.4018/‌978-1-5225-7356-2.ch013
  21. Özarı, Ç., & Ocak, M. (2013). Detection of earnings management by applying Benford’s Law in selected accounts: Evidence from quarterly financial statements of Turkish public companies. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences59(4), 37-52.‏ https:/‌/‌www.researchgate.net/‌publication/‌270278179
  22. Pinkham, R. (1961). On the Distribution of First Significant Digits, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(4), 1223–1230. https:/‌/‌web.williams.edu/‌Mathematics/‌sjmiller/‌public_html/‌BrownClasses/‌197/‌benford/‌Pinkham_FirstDigit.pdf
  23. Sharf, N., & Abu Nassar, M. (2021). The Effect of Audit Quality and Auditor's Opinion on Earnings Management: Evidence from Jordan. Jordan Journal of Business Administration17(2).‏ 236-253. https:/‌/‌www.researchgate.net/‌publication/‌378342790
  24. Shette, R., & Kuntluru, S. (2014). Rounding-up in reported income numbers: Evidence from Indian companies. Review of Accounting and Finance, 13(2), 156-170. DOI:10.1108/‌RAF-04-2013-0042
  25. Van Caneghem, T. (2002). Earnings management induced by cognitive reference points. British Accounting Review, 34(2), 167-178. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1006/‌bare.2002.0190
  26. Van De Ven, A.H., & Poole, M.S., (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510–540. http:/‌/‌dx.doi.org/‌10.2307/‌258786
  27. Akhlaqi Yazdinejad, E., Safipour Afshar, M., & Noorani, H. (2019). Investigating and comparing the audit quality of large and small audit firms using Benford's law. Auditing Science, 20(80), 5-24. https:/‌/‌ensani.ir/‌fa/‌article/‌444852 [In Persian]
  28. Alavi Tabar, S. H., & Bakeri, A. (2011). Earning Management to Achieve Cognitive Reference points, Financial Accounting Research, 10(3), 1-18. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌20.1001.1.23223405.1390.3.3.1.4 [In Persian]
  29. Asnaashari, H., Safarzadeh, M., & Rezaei Namavar, H. (2020). Cosmetic Earnings (Losses) and Debt Management with Emphasis on Corporate Governance Role, Accounting Advances (JAA), 12(1), 1-26. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌ 10.22099/‌JAA.2020.35676.1959 [In Persian]
  30. Daghani, R., Hajian, N., & Toloyee, K. (2020). Effects of the Board's Ownership and Oversight Structure And Audit Characteristics on Earning Management. Empirical Research in Accounting, 9(4), 299-326. https:/‌/‌doi: 10.22051/‌jera.2018.20138.2019[In Persian]
  31. Hekmat, H., Heydarzadeh Khalifekhandi, V., & Ghorbani, R. (2024). The Moderating Role of Conservatism in the Relationship between Audit Quality and Earnings Management, Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 21(83), 121- 162. DOI: 10.22054/‌qjma.2024.79187.2555 [In Persian]
  32. Izadyneya, N., Kiani, Gh., & Mirzayi, M. (2020). The Impact of Company Life Cycle Stage Characteristics on the Time Irregularity of Operating Cash Flow of Companies Listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, Auditing knowledge, 15(59), 57-76. http:/‌/‌ensani.ir/‌fa/‌article/‌350436 [In Persian]
  33. Khodami Pour, A., Mohammadreza Khani, V., & Hushmand Zaferanie, R. (2013). Investigating the effect of audit quality characteristics and equity cost. Empirical Accounting Research, 10(3), 71-88. http:/‌/‌ensani.ir/‌fa/‌article/‌350436 [In Persian]
  34. Mahmoudi, S., & Mahmoudi, S. (2025). Earnings Manipulation and Benford’s Law: A Study of Tehran Stock Exchange. Accounting and Auditing Research, 17(65), 139-158.
  35. https:/‌/‌doi: 10.22034/‌iaar.2025.222688 [In Persian]
  36. Pour Heydari, O., & Hemmati, D. (2004). Investigating the effect of debt contracts, political costs, bonus plans, and ownership on earnings management in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, Accounting and auditing reviews, 11(45), 71-88. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌ 20.1001.1.26458020.1383.11.2.5.7 [In Persian]
  37. Setayesh, M. H., Masoudi, Y., Dehdari, E., & Sadeghi, M. (2024). The Effect of Mental Accounting on Audit Quality. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting21(83), 1-42. doi: 10.22054/‌qjma.2024.79615.2567[In Persian]
  38. Shamsoddini, K., Daneshi, V., & Mohalati Raini, M. (2020). The ability of Benford's law to detect fraud in both the income statement and the balance sheet. Auditing knowledge, 18(73), 166-187. http:/‌/‌ensani.ir/‌fa/‌article/‌350436 [In Persian]
  39. Taghavi Fardoud, V., Baradaran Hasanzadeh, R., & Mohammadi, A. (2020). The Ability of Firm Life Cycle Patterns in Explaining Financial Flexibility (Based on the Adjusted Financial Flexibility Index). Financial Management Perspective, 10(32), 159-188. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.52547/‌JFMP.10.32.15 [In Persian]
  40. Vaghfi, S.H., & Darabi, R. (2018). Application of Benford Law in the Analysis of Financial Distress in Public Companies, Governmental Accounting, 4(1), 59-72. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌20.1001.1.24234613.1396.4.1.5.1 [In Persian]