تأثیر پیچیدگی افشای مالی بر واکنش بازار سرمایه ایران: نقش تعدیل‌گری توجه در شبکه‌های اجتماعی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

گروه حسابداری، واحد سوسنگرد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سوسنگرد، ایران.

چکیده
هدف این پژوهش بررسی تأثیر پیچیدگی افشای مالی بر واکنش بازار سرمایه ایران با تأکید بر نقش تعدیل‌گری توجه در شبکه‌های اجتماعی است. بر اساس چارچوب مالی رفتاری و نظریه‌های توجه محدود و هزینه‌های پردازش اطلاعات، انتظار می‌رود پیچیدگی افشا واکنش بازار را تضعیف کند، اما توجه ایجادشده در شبکه‌های اجتماعی می‌تواند این رابطه را تعدیل نماید. برای آزمون این فرضیه‌ها، داده‌های ۱۲۸ شرکت پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران در بازه زمانی ۱۳۹۵ تا ۱۴۰۲ (۱۰۲۴ مشاهده شرکت-سال) با روش غربالگری سیستماتیک جمع‌آوری شد. پیچیدگی افشا با شاخص ترکیبی شامل طول گزارش (لگاریتم تعداد کلمات یادداشت‌های توضیحی)، چگالی اعداد (نسبت ارقام عددی به کلمات) و درجه ابهام (فراوانی کلمات مبهم) اندازه‌گیری گردید. توجه سرمایه‌گذاران با استفاده از داده‌های شبکه اجتماعی توئیتر فارسی و به‌کمک روش‌های پردازش زبان طبیعی (کتابخانه‌های Hazm و snscrape) کمی‌سازی شد. یافته‌های حاصل از رگرسیون داده‌های پانل با اثرات ثابت نشان داد که پیچیدگی افشا رابطه منفی و معناداری با بازده غیرعادی انباشته دارد؛ به‌گونه‌ای که یک انحراف معیار افزایش در پیچیدگی، بازده غیرعادی را ۱٫۴ درصد کاهش می‌دهد. همچنین، سطح توجه در توئیتر این رابطه منفی را به‌طور معناداری تضعیف می‌کند و در سطوح بالای توجه، اثر بازدارنده پیچیدگی تقریباً خنثی می‌شود. این یافته‌ها بر لزوم ساده‌سازی گزارش‌های مالی توسط تنظیم‌گران و بهره‌گیری شرکت‌ها از شبکه‌های اجتماعی برای جلب‌توجه سازنده تأکید می‌کند. نوآوری پژوهش در گذار از تحلیل مفهومی به آزمون تجربی با داده‌های کلان و تلفیق دو حوزه گزارشگری مالی و اقتصاد توجه دیجیتال است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The Impact of Financial Disclosure Complexity on the Iranian Capital Market Reaction: The Moderating Role of Social Media Attention

نویسنده English

Sajede HasanNejadNeysi
Department of Accounting, So.C., Islamic Azad University, Susangerd, Iran
چکیده English

This study examines the effect of financial disclosure complexity on the Iranian capital market reaction, focusing on the moderating role of social media attention. Drawing on limited attention theory and information processing cost theory, the study hypothesizes that complex disclosures weaken immediate market reactions, but that pre-disclosure attention on Persian Twitter mitigates this negative effect. Using panel data from 128 non-financial firms listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange over 2016–2023 (1,024 firm-year observations), disclosure complexity is measured via a composite index of report length, numerical density, and ambiguity. Investor attention is proxied by the logarithm of firm-specific Twitter posts in the five days before annual report releases, extracted using Python and Persian NLP tools. Fixed-effects panel regressions with firm-clustered robust standard errors show that a one-standard-deviation increase in complexity reduces cumulative abnormal returns (CAR[0,+1]) by about 1.4%. More importantly, the interaction between complexity and attention is positive and significant: for firms in the highest attention quartile, the negative effect of complexity becomes statistically indistinguishable from zero. The direct effect of attention alone is insignificant, suggesting that attention mainly moderates rather than directly informs prices. The findings imply that social media attention can serve as a cognitive corrective in emerging markets, helping investors process complex disclosures. Regulators and firms should therefore simplify reporting and use digital channels to attract constructive attention.
Limited Attention, Behavioral Finance, Financial Disclosure Complexity, Social Media, Twitter, Market Reaction, Tehran Stock Exchange, Panel Data, Event Study
1. Introduction
This study investigates the impact of financial disclosure complexity on the reaction of the Iranian capital market, emphasizing the moderating role of social media attention. Grounded in behavioral finance, specifically limited attention theory and information processing costs, the research addresses two fundamental questions: (1) whether more complex financial disclosures lead to weaker market reaction in the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE), and (2) whether attention generated on Persian Twitter moderates this negative relationship. The study provides empirical evidence from an emerging market context, contributing to the literature on cognitive biases in financial decision-making and the informational role of social media.
2. Literature Review
The theoretical framework integrates Limited Attention Theory (Kahneman, 1973; Hirshleifer & Teoh, 2003) and Information Processing Cost Theory (Bloomfield, 2008). Investors face cognitive constraints, operating as selective information processors. Complex disclosures—characterized by length, numerical density, and ambiguous language—elevate processing costs, leading to incomplete or delayed price adjustments. This phenomenon is particularly pronounced in emerging markets like Iran, where retail investors with lower financial literacy constitute a significant portion of market participants. Concurrently, the digital attention economy paradigm suggests social media platforms have become primary arenas for attracting investor attention. Platforms like Twitter facilitate collective discourse and cognitive facilitation, potentially mitigating the adverse effects of information complexity. Based on this synthesis, two hypotheses were developed: H1 posits a negative relationship between financial disclosure complexity and immediate market reaction (measured by cumulative abnormal returns and abnormal trading volume). H2 proposes that pre-disclosure social media attention positively moderates this relationship; the negative effect of complexity on market reaction is weaker for firms receiving higher levels of digital attention.
3. Methodology
The study employs a quantitative, event-study-based design with panel data spanning 2016–2023. The final sample comprises 1,024 firm-year observations from 128 non-financial companies listed on the TSE, selected through systematic screening. Disclosure complexity was measured using a multidimensional composite index, standardizing and averaging three proxies: (1) report length (logarithm of word count in explanatory notes), (2) numerical density (ratio of numerical digits to total words), and (3) degree of ambiguity (frequency of uncertain words such as "may," "probably," "risk"). Textual data were extracted from financial reports on the Codal database using Python libraries (PyPDF2, pdfplumber, BeautifulSoup) and processed with Hazm, a specialized Persian NLP library. Investor attention was quantified using data from Persian Twitter. Over 250,000 Persian tweets containing company-specific keywords were collected using snscrape and tweepy libraries. The attention metric (ATTN) was defined as the natural logarithm of the average daily count of unique, firm-specific posts during the five-day window preceding annual report releases. Control variables included firm size, book-to-market ratio, profitability (ROA), leverage, institutional ownership, Big Four auditor quality, and market return index. The analytical approach employed fixed-effects panel regression models with firm-clustered robust standard errors. The main model tested the interaction between COMP and ATTN, with robustness ensured through alternative variable constructions, different event windows, GMM estimation, and subsample analyses.
4. Results
The empirical analysis provides strong support for both hypotheses. First, a statistically significant (p < 0.01) negative coefficient was found for the complexity variable (COMP). Economically, a one-standard-deviation increase in complexity leads to an approximately 1.4% reduction in short-window cumulative abnormal returns (CAR[0,+1]). This confirms that greater disclosure complexity dampens the market's immediate price adjustment, supporting limited attention and information processing cost theories. Second, the interaction term between COMP and ATTN was positive and statistically significant (p < 0.05). Marginal effect analysis revealed that the negative slope of complexity on returns flattens as social media attention increases. For firms in the highest attention quartile, the adverse effect of complexity becomes statistically indistinguishable from zero, demonstrating that high levels of digital attention can effectively neutralize the information processing barrier created by complex disclosures. Notably, the direct effect of social media attention alone on returns was insignificant, highlighting that its primary role is moderating rather than directly price-informative. Robustness checks using alternative windows, volume measures (CAV), different complexity specifications, and subsample analyses consistently reaffirmed the core results. Subsample analysis showed that the moderating effect of attention was stronger for firms with lower institutional ownership, where retail investors predominate.
5. Conclusion
This research establishes that the efficiency of the Iranian capital market in incorporating complex financial information is not determined by disclosure complexity alone but is fundamentally contingent upon the level of investor attention it garners in the digital ecosystem. It provides compelling evidence that social media activity can function as a societal corrective to cognitive limitations, enhancing price discovery. The study advocates for an integrated perspective in market regulation and corporate strategy that simultaneously addresses the quality of formal disclosures and the dynamics of informal digital communication channels. For regulators, the evidence underscores the need for policies promoting simplification and readability in mandatory disclosures. For corporate managers, the results highlight the strategic importance of active investor relations in the digital sphere. For retail investors, the study serves as a caution about cognitive biases and suggests consulting credible informal channels when confronting complex reports. Future research could extend this work by incorporating multiple social media platforms, employing advanced NLP techniques to distinguish between productive and superficial attention, and exploring cross-country comparative studies.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Limited Attention
Behavioral Finance
Financial Disclosure Complexity
Social Media
Twitter
Market Reaction
Tehran Stock Exchange
Panel Data
Event Study
  1. باغومیان، ر.‌، همکاران.‌ (1400).‌ رابطه بین خوانایی گزارشگری مالی و واکنش بازار نسبت به اطلاعات پیچیده.‌ مطالعات تجربی حسابداری مالی، ۱۸ (۷۱)، ۱-۲۸.‌ https://qjma.‌atu.‌ac.‌ir
  2. حسن‌زاده، ا.‌، رضایی، ف.‌، و پورحیدری، ا.‌ (1400).‌ تأثیر خوانایی صورت‌های مالی بر مدیریت سود: شواهدی از بورس اوراق بهادار تهران.‌ پژوهش‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، ۱۳ (۴۹)، ۱-۲۲.‌ https://acctgrev.‌ut.‌ac.‌ir/
  3. حسینی، س.‌ ع.‌، و خوئینی، م.‌ (1396).‌ شبکه‌های اجتماعی؛ بازار  سرمایه و گزارشگری مالی.‌ پژوهش‌های تجربی حسابداری، 7(2)، ۲۸۵-۳۰۲.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌22051/IJAR.‌2017.‌15300.‌1294
  4. رسائیان، س.‌، سپهوند، ر.‌، و نیکومرام، ه.‌ (1396).‌ تأثیر کیفیت افشای اختیاری و خوانایی گزارش بر همزمانی قیمت سهام.‌ مطالعات حسابداری و حسابرسی، ۲۳ (۴)، ۵۰۷-۵۲۸.‌ https://www.‌sid.‌ir/paper/123458/fa
  5. مهرآرا، م.‌، صالح‌آبادی، ع.‌، و عبدلی، ق.‌ (1396).‌ کارایی رویدادپژوهی در بازار سهام تهران: معرفی رویکرد خودرگرسیونی با واریانس ناهمسانی شرطی.‌ تحقیقات مالی، ۱۹ (۲)، ۳۲۹-۳۵۲.‌ https://jfr.‌ut.‌ac.‌ir
  6. یاحقی، ا.‌، بنی‌مهد، ب.‌، و حصارزاده، م.‌ (1399).‌ تأثیر احساسات سرمایه‌گذاران در شبکه اجتماعی توئیتر بر حجم معاملات بورس اوراق بهادار تهران.‌ مطالعات کمی در مدیریت، ۱۱ (۴)، ۱-۲۴.‌ https://www.‌sid.‌ir/paper/123459/fa
  7. Aktas, N.‌, Cousin, J.‌ G.‌, & de Bodt, E.‌ (2007).‌ Event studies with a contaminated estimation period.‌ Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(1), 129-145.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌1016/j.‌jcorpfin.‌2006.‌09.‌002
  8. Alfieri, L.‌, & Gioia, D.‌ (2024).‌ Retail attention and earnings announcement returns.‌ Journal of Banking & Finance, 160, 107095.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌1016/j.‌jbankfin.‌2023.‌107095
  9. Barber, B.‌ M.‌, & Odean, T.‌ (2008).‌ All that glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors.‌ The Review of Financial Studies, 21(2), 785-818.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌1093/rfs/hhm079
  10. Bartov, E.‌, Faurel, L.‌, & Mohanram, P.‌ S.‌ (2018).‌ Can Twitter help predict firm-level earnings and stock returns? The Accounting Review, 93(3), 25-57.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌2308/accr-51865
  11. Beaver, W.‌ H.‌ (1968).‌ The information content of annual earnings announcements.‌ Journal of Accounting Research, 6, 67-92.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌2307/2490070
  12. Bloomfield, R.‌ (2008).‌ Discussion of "Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence".‌ Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(2-3), 248-252.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌1016/j.‌jacceco.‌2008.‌04.‌001
  13. Bochkay, K.‌, & Levine, C.‌ B.‌ (2019).‌ Using MD&A to improve earnings forecasts.‌ Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 34(3), 458-482.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌1177/0148558X17740119
  14. Chen, H.‌, De, P.‌, Hu, Y.‌, & Hwang, B.‌ H.‌ (2021).‌ Wisdom of crowds: The value of stock opinions transmitted through social media.‌ The Review of Financial Studies, 27(5), 1367-1403.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌1093/rfs/hhu001
  15. Crawford, S.‌ S.‌, Kim, S.‌, & Koo, D.‌ S.‌ (2024).‌ Twitter attention and market liquidity.‌ Journal of Financial Markets, 67, 100892.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌1016/j.‌finmar.‌2023.‌100892
  16. Da, Z.‌, Engelberg, J.‌, & Gao, P.‌ (2011).‌ In search of attention.‌ The Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1461-1499.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌1111/j.‌1540-6261.‌2011.‌01680.‌x
  17. DellaVigna, S.‌, & Pollet, J.‌ M.‌ (2009).‌ Investor inattention and Friday earnings announcements.‌ The Journal of Finance, 64(2), 709-749.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌1111/j.‌1540-6261.‌2009.‌01447.‌x
  18. Easley, D.‌, & O'hara, M.‌ (2004).‌ Information and the cost of capital.‌ The Journal of Finance, 59(4), 1553-1583.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌1111/j.‌1540-6261.‌2004.‌00672.‌x
  19. Fama, E.‌ F.‌ (1970).‌ Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work.‌ The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌2307/2325486
  20. Fama, E.‌ F.‌, Fisher, L.‌, Jensen, M.‌ C.‌, & Roll, R.‌ (1969).‌ The adjustment of stock prices to new information.‌ International Economic Review, 10(1), 1-21.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌2307/2525569
  21. Hirshleifer, D.‌, & Teoh, S.‌ H.‌ (2003).‌ Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting.‌ Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36(1-3), 337-386.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌1016/j.‌jacceco.‌2003.‌10.‌002
  22. Hussainey, K.‌ (2009).‌ The impact of audit quality on earnings predictability.‌ Managerial Auditing Journal, 24(4), 340-351.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌1108/02686900910948198
  23. Kahneman, D.‌ (1973).‌ Attention and effort.‌ Prentice-Hall.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌4324/9781003309910
  24. Kahneman, D.‌, & Tversky, A.‌ (1979).‌ Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk.‌ Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌2307/1914185
  25. Landis, J.‌ R.‌, & Koch, G.‌ G.‌ (1977).‌ The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.‌ Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌2307/2529310
  26. Le, N.‌ H.‌ (2014).‌ Auditing and earnings management in New Zealand [Doctoral dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington], Victoria University of Wellington.‌ https://researcharchive.‌vuw.‌ac.‌nz/xmlui/handle/10063/12345
  27. Lehavy, R.‌, Li, F.‌, & Merkley, K.‌ (2011).‌ The effect of annual report readability on analyst following and the properties of their earnings forecasts.‌ The Accounting Review, 86(3), 1087-1115.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌2308/accr.‌00000043
  28. Li, F.‌ (2008).‌ Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence.‌ Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(2-3), 221-247.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌1016/j.‌jacceco.‌2008.‌02.‌003
  29. Loughran, T.‌, & McDonald, B.‌ (2011).‌ When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-Ks.‌ The Journal of Finance, 66(1), 35-65.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌1111/j.‌1540-6261.‌2010.‌01625.‌x
  30. Loughran, T.‌, & McDonald, B.‌ (2014).‌ Measuring readability in financial disclosures.‌ The Journal of Finance, 69(4), 1643-1671.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌1111/jofi.‌12162
  31. Loughran, T.‌, & McDonald, B.‌ (2016).‌ Textual analysis in accounting and finance: A survey.‌ Journal of Accounting Research, 54(4), 1187-1230.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌1111/1475-679X.‌12123
  32. MacKinlay, A.‌ C.‌ (1997).‌ Event studies in economics and finance.‌ Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 13-39.‌ https://www.‌jstor.‌org/stable/2729691
  33. Miller, B.‌ P.‌ (2010).‌ The effects of reporting complexity on small and large investor trading.‌ The Accounting Review, 85(6), 2107-2143.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌2308/accr.‌00000002
  34. Moradi, M.‌, Salehi, M.‌, & Zamanirad, M.‌ (2021).‌ The impact of emotional tendencies of individual investors on stock price synchronicity: Evidence from Iran.‌ Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 30, 100496.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌1016/j.‌jbef.‌2021.‌100496
  35. Pedersen, L.‌ H.‌ (2022).‌ Financial markets in the age of attention.‌ Journal of Financial Economics, 146(3), 687-718.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌1016/j.‌jfineco.‌2022.‌05.‌002
  36. Petersen, M.‌ A.‌ (2009).‌ Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches.‌ The Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435-480.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌1093/rfs/hhn053
  37. Ramos, S.‌, Latoeiro, P.‌, & Veiga, H.‌ (2020).‌ Limited attention, salience of information and stock market activity.‌ Economic Modelling, 87, 92-108.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌1016/j.‌econmod.‌2019.‌07.‌009
  38. Ruggeri, K.‌, Alí, S.‌, Berge, M.‌ L.‌, Bertoldo, G.‌, Bjørndal, L.‌ D.‌, Cortijos-Bernabeu, A.‌, .‌.‌.‌ & Folke, T.‌ (2020).‌ Replicating patterns of prospect theory for decision under risk.‌ Nature human behaviour, 4(6), 622-633.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌1038/s41562-020-0886-x
  39. Jinfang, T.‌, Xiaotong, Y.‌, Rui, X.‌, & Chen, W.‌ (2020).‌ Uncertain event, investor attention and heterogeneity of the stock market: a case study on COVID-19.‌ Journal of Finance and Economics, 46(11), 19-33.‌
  40. Tversky, A.‌, & Kahneman, D.‌ (1974).‌ Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.‌ Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌1126/science.‌185.‌4157.‌1124
  41. Wang, K.‌, & Wu, C.‌ (2023).‌ Social media attention and earnings announcement returns.‌ Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 61(1), 1-34.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌1007/s11156-023-01178-9
  42. You, H.‌, & Zhang, X.‌ J.‌ (2009).‌ Financial reporting complexity and investor underreaction to 10-K information.‌ Review of Accounting Studies, 14(4), 559-586.‌ https://doi.‌org/10.‌1007/s11142-008-9083-9
دوره 23، شماره 91
پاییز 1405
صفحه 217-258

  • تاریخ دریافت 05 دی 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 16 اسفند 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 23 خرداد 1405