Accounting report
Yasser Rezaei Pitenoei
Abstract
Objective: Corporate sustainability represents a distinct approach to business in which organizations create long-term value for all their stakeholders. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to examine whether, and in what way, corporate sustainability reporting influences trade credit financing. ...
Read More
Objective: Corporate sustainability represents a distinct approach to business in which organizations create long-term value for all their stakeholders. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to examine whether, and in what way, corporate sustainability reporting influences trade credit financing. The underlying assumption is that suppliers may perceive a firm’s sustainability performance as an indicator of sustainable development, thereby showing greater willingness to invest in such firms and making more favorable financing decisions. Corporate sustainability reporting can reduce both informational and operational risks, which in turn may enhance the level of financing obtained through trade credit. The novelty of this research lies in its extension of the factors that affect trade credit.Method: This study is classified as an applied research in terms of its objective and has been conducted using a library-based data collection method. For the analysis, multiple regression techniques have been employed. The statistical population consists of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange during the period 2020 to 2024 (1399–1403 in the Iranian calendar). The sample selection was restricted to firms that met the following criteria:They were admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange prior to 2020 and remained listed until the end of 2024.Their fiscal year ends in March (Esfand).They did not undergo any changes in their line of business or fiscal year during the study period.They are not classified as investment companies or financial intermediaries, since due to the distinct nature of their activities, such firms were excluded from the research population. So the research hypothesis was tested using a sample of 134 active firms listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange during the years 2020–2024. A multivariate regression model based on panel data was employed. In terms of purpose, this study is applied research, and in terms of inference method and research design, it falls within the category of descriptive-analytical studies of a correlational and ex post facto nature.Findings: The examination of the F-statistic and its significance level indicates that the fitted regression model is valid at the 5 percent significance level. Based on the adjusted coefficient of determination, it can be stated that approximately 59 percent of the variations in firms’ trade credit are explained by the independent and control variables of the model. As shown in the results table, the estimated coefficient and the t-statistic for the sustainability reporting variable (SUSR) are positive and statistically significant at the 5 percent level, confirming a positive and significant relationship between sustainability reporting and trade credit. Furthermore, the analysis of the relationship between firm size (Size) and trade credit reveals a significance level below 0.05 and a positive estimated coefficient, suggesting a positive association between company size and trade credit. On the other hand, the relationship between leverage (Lev) and trade credit is found to be significantly negative, indicating that higher financial leverage reduces firms’ access to trade credit. Based on this evidence, the null hypothesis (H0) is rejected and the research hypothesis is supported. In an additional test, the relationship between sustainability reporting and trade credit was examined separately for each of the five years of the study period. The results show that the coefficient of this variable is positive in all years; however, in the early years of the study, the level of significance was relatively low. This finding suggests that in more recent years, given the link between sustainability reporting and financial performance, the importance and attention paid to evaluating such disclosures by firms has increased considerably.Conclusion: Acceptance of the research hypothesis can be explained by the fact that disclosing information on economic, environmental, social, and corporate governance performance enhances investor confidence, thereby reducing information asymmetry and improving the firm’s information environment. Sustainability reporting can reduce both informational and operational risks of firms, which in turn increases the level of financing through trade credit. Moreover, sustainability reporting signals a company’s commitment to the future and to the sustainability of its business, encouraging suppliers to engage in long-term cooperation and to offer more favorable credit terms.Contribution: In line with the country’s overarching approach to sustainable development, and within the framework of the Constitution, the general policies of the Vision 2025 Document, and the objectives of the Seventh National Development Plan (2024–2028 / 1403–1407), policymakers have emphasized the importance of ensuring stability and sustainability in commercial activities, controlling liquidity, and enhancing transparency in the financial and banking system. In this regard, reliance on empirical studies and evidence-based analyses is essential, as such an approach enables a deeper understanding of sustainability requirements and provides the foundation for improving the sustainable performance of Iranian companies and enhancing their competitiveness at both national and international levels.
Accounting report
Afsaneh Bahiraei; Seyed Ali Hosseini; Parisasadat behbahaninia
Abstract
Sustainability reporting, as one of the modern instruments for enhancing transparency, accountability, and organizational legitimacy, has gained increasing prominence within financial and economic systems. Due to its pivotal role in resource allocation, risk management, and its indirect influence on ...
Read More
Sustainability reporting, as one of the modern instruments for enhancing transparency, accountability, and organizational legitimacy, has gained increasing prominence within financial and economic systems. Due to its pivotal role in resource allocation, risk management, and its indirect influence on economic, social, and environmental development, the banking industry requires a coherent and sector-specific sustainability reporting framework more than other industries. However, existing frameworks do not fully align with the specific nature, functions, and regulatory requirements of banks. The aim of this study is to develop a sustainability reporting framework tailored to the Iranian banking industry and to explain its core dimensions in the form of a strategic roadmap. This study adopts a mixed-methods approach. In the qualitative phase, grounded theory was employed, and data were collected through 14 semi-structured interviews with academic experts, banking managers, and professional auditors to identify the dimensions and components of sustainability reporting. The validity of the qualitative findings was confirmed using the classical Delphi method. In the quantitative phase, with the participation of 30 board members and bank managers, the relative importance of the dimensions was determined using the interpretive ranking method. The results indicate that sustainability reporting in the Iranian banking industry is structured around five main dimensions: governance, economic, social, environmental, and compliance and risk. These dimensions are articulated through ten components and fifty conceptual propositions. Among them, the governance dimension was identified as the most central component, playing a fundamental role in enhancing transparency, strengthening stakeholder trust, and improving banks’ organizational legitimacy.IntroductionSustainability reporting is increasingly recognized as a key tool for transparency and accountability beyond traditional financial reporting. Existing frameworks often face implementation challenges and may not address industry-specific needs. In the banking sector, effective sustainability reporting is critical due to its central role in capital allocation and reducing information asymmetry. Institutional gaps, high disclosure costs, and limited guidance hinder consistent reporting. Therefore, tailored reporting mechanisms are needed to enhance transparency, meet stakeholder expectations, and support sustainable investment decisions. This study explores these challenges and proposes a framework for improving sustainability disclosure in banks.Literature ReviewSustainability originates from the broader concept of sustainable development, emphasizing the balance between current resource use and the needs of future generations. Initially focused on environmental aspects, sustainability reporting has expanded to include social and economic dimensions. Existing frameworks provide guidelines for non-financial reporting, yet they often lack balance across different sustainability indicators. Voluntary disclosure may lead to selective reporting, misrepresentation, and reduced transparency. Differences between industries further challenge the uniform application of these frameworks, particularly in sectors with unique operational characteristics. In banking, non-financial disclosures such as governance, risk management, and social performance are crucial due to the sector’s role in capital allocation. Institutional gaps and the absence of industry-specific standards hinder effective sustainability reporting in banks. Integrated reporting that combines financial and non-financial information can improve transparency and stakeholder confidence. Tailored reporting frameworks are essential to address sector-specific challenges and enhance sustainability practices. This study focuses on examining the effectiveness and implementation of sustainability reporting in the banking industry.MethodologhyThis study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative analyses to examine sustainability reporting in the banking industry. The qualitative phase utilizes grounded theory, with semi-structured interviews and three-stage coding to identify key sustainability reporting criteria. Thirteen experts, including academics, banking managers, and auditors, participated until theoretical saturation was reached. The Delphi technique was then applied to validate and achieve consensus on the identified criteria, linking qualitative insights to the quantitative phase. In the quantitative stage, thirty bank managers and board members completed structured rating and pairwise comparison surveys using fuzzy linguistic scales. These data were analyzed to rank and weight the main components of sustainability reporting. Overall, the methodology integrates grounded theory, Delphi validation, and fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making to develop a robust theoretical framework for banking sustainability reporting.ResultThis study develops a tailored sustainability reporting framework for the Iranian banking industry using an integrated mixed-methods approach that combines grounded theory, Delphi validation, and interpretive ranking analysis. Through fourteen expert interviews, five overarching categories, ten core components, and fifty-two thematic propositions were identified, forming the foundational structure of the proposed framework. The Delphi process subsequently validated fifty themes, thereby reinforcing the coherence, relevance, and reliability of the extracted conceptual model. These components span human-resource capabilities, competitive and governance-related practices, social responsibility commitments, intergenerational environmental stewardship, and professional ethical obligations. In the quantitative phase, senior banking managers evaluated the relative influence of the framework’s components through structured pairwise comparisons. Results revealed that governance disclosure practices constitute the most influential and central axis of the proposed sustainability reporting framework. This includes transparent reporting of board activities, executive appointment and tenure criteria, remuneration mechanisms, and governance performance indicators. Strengthening disclosure in this dimension enhances organizational legitimacy, reinforces stakeholder trust, and improves the transparency of banking operations. Overall, the study presents a comprehensive and sector-specific framework that serves as a strategic roadmap for regulators, policymakers, and banks seeking to institutionalize sustainability reporting practices aligned with industry needs.DiscussionThis study develops a framework for sustainability reporting in the Iranian banking sector, highlighting governance as a core dimension. Detailed disclosure of board activities, remuneration policies, and decision-making processes enhances stakeholder trust and supports informed decisions. Historically, non-financial governance information was reported symbolically, limiting transparency and accountability. The findings indicate that improved disclosure practices can strengthen internal controls and demonstrate the independence of bank boards. Governance-focused sustainability reporting also differentiates banks from competitors by signaling higher responsibility toward social, economic, and environmental interests. Implementing structured monitoring mechanisms and annual evaluation checklists can incentivize broader voluntary disclosures. Overall, the study emphasizes that robust governance reporting is essential for enhancing stakeholder confidence and promoting sustainable banking practices.The study confirms that tailored sustainability reporting frameworks are crucial for the banking sector. Enhanced governance disclosure enables banks to build trust, improve transparency, and support stakeholder decision-making. Regulatory adjustments and policy interventions are necessary to encourage comprehensive voluntary reporting. Proper implementation can strengthen banks’ competitive positions while contributing to overall sustainable development. Ultimately, banks that prioritize sustainability reporting play a key role in guiding society toward broader sustainable outcomes.
Accounting report
Javad Shekarkhah
Abstract
The growing significance of sustainability reporting, as one of the most recent and pivotal trends in the transformation of corporate reporting, has led to a substantial increase in research in this field. Accordingly, this study conducts a systematic review of research examining the effect of sustainability ...
Read More
The growing significance of sustainability reporting, as one of the most recent and pivotal trends in the transformation of corporate reporting, has led to a substantial increase in research in this field. Accordingly, this study conducts a systematic review of research examining the effect of sustainability reporting on financial performance. The final sample comprises 95 articles indexed in the Scopus and Web of Science databases, covering the period from 2013 to the end of June 2025. The PRISMA checklist was employed to develop the review protocol. The findings indicate that 70% of the studies report a positive impact of sustainability reporting on ROA, 64% demonstrate a positive effect on ROE, and 72% show a positive influence on market-based performance metrics (such as Tobin's Q and the market-to-book value ratio). These results suggest a relative consensus regarding the positive impact of sustainability reporting on corporate performance. Additionally, the findings reveal that contextual factors and moderating variables, such as the level of economic development, corporate governance, ESG investors, GRI standards, and levels of transparency, can influence this relationship. Furthermore, the study highlights that different components of ESG disclosures may have varying impacts on corporate performance, although research outcomes in this regard are highly heterogeneous. Collectively, the reviewed studies suggest that sustainability reporting is not merely a regulatory requirement but a strategic asset for enhancing financial performance, underscoring the need for companies to develop long-term strategies for implementing sustainability reporting.
Introduction
In recent decades, corporate performance has been defined as a measure of a firm's effectiveness in utilizing limited resources to create value. In the context of value creation, companies strive to achieve sufficient returns while meeting the expectations of relevant stakeholders (Brundtland, 1987). In the current era, investors increasingly consider not only financial reports but also non-financial disclosures to better inform their investment decisions. Sustainability reporting, which enhances transparency, enables investors to make more informed and well-founded investment choices (Leins, 2020). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues and sustainability are closely intertwined concepts that have garnered significant attention in recent years due to the need to address global challenges and promote responsible business practices. Sustainability reporting is defined as a set of activities undertaken by organizations to provide evidence of the integration of social and environmental considerations into corporate operations and interactions with stakeholders. The concept of sustainability reporting emerged in the early 1980s with the advent of environmental reporting (Aifuwa, 2020).
The academic literature suggests that engaging in corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities not only enhances relationships with stakeholders and the broader community but also differentiates companies in competitive markets, fostering trust and maximizing value (Ameer & Othman, 2012; Van Linh et al., 2022). In recent years, sustainability reporting has garnered significant attention as companies, investors, and consumers increasingly prioritize sustainability. Sustainability is defined as meeting present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. As companies strive to maintain their market position amid rapidly evolving business environments, it has become evident that a sole focus on financial performance is no longer sufficient. Sustainability performance and disclosure have become increasingly critical for achieving competitive success (Hahn & Kühnen, 2013).
A substantial body of research has explored the relationship between sustainability and corporate performance, yielding varied results ranging from positive to insignificant or negative outcomes (Rodgers et al., 2019). The literature on the relationship between sustainability reporting and corporate financial performance has produced conflicting findings, with prior studies indicating that results are so diverse that definitive conclusions remain elusive (Nguyen et al., 2025). Given these considerations, the challenges associated with sustainability and corporate performance have attracted growing attention from researchers and practitioners, leading to a significant increase in related publications. Several studies have sought to synthesize this extensive literature, employing bibliometric analysis and systematic reviews to gain a comprehensive understanding of the field, identify knowledge gaps, explore new ideas, and position their contributions within the existing body of research. While bibliometric analyses and systematic reviews on sustainability and its reporting have proliferated, few studies have specifically focused on the relationship between sustainability reporting and corporate performance.
A review of the literature reveals that systematic reviews of the relationship between sustainability reporting and performance have received limited attention. Recent studies have primarily focused on bibliometric analyses to identify trends and key patterns in this field, without providing a comprehensive synthesis or analysis of the key findings of relevant research. Given the increasing importance of sustainability reporting as one of the latest transformative trends in corporate reporting, this study undertakes a systematic review of research examining the impact of sustainability reporting on financial performance.
Methodology
This research is classified as applied and exploratory in terms of its objectives and aligns with the interpretive paradigm and a qualitative research methodology. Consistent with the research objectives, a systematic review method was employed for data collection, and an inductive content analysis approach was used to analyze the selected studies. The latest version of the PRISMA checklist (2020) was utilized to develop the review protocol. The search for articles was conducted in two reputable academic databases, Scopus and Web of Science. The research period was set from 2013 to the end of June 2025. To enhance the sensitivity and comprehensiveness of the search, equivalent and related keywords for the two main terms, "sustainability reporting" and "corporate financial performance," were used in combination with the Boolean operator "OR." The search was limited to English-language, peer-reviewed journal articles. The retrieved articles were imported into the Zotero software based on the search protocol and subjected to multiple screening stages. Initially, duplicate articles from both databases were removed. Subsequently, articles relevant to the research topic and objectives were selected based on their titles. In the next stage, articles were screened based on their abstracts. Finally, after a full-text review, 95 studies were retained for analysis.
Results
The systematic review of the studies indicates that a substantial majority of the examined research supports a positive relationship between sustainability reporting and both accounting-based performance measures (return on assets and return on equity) and market-based performance measures (Tobin's Q and market-to-book value ratio). Specifically, 70% of the studies report a positive impact of sustainability reporting on return on assets, 64% indicate a positive effect on return on equity, and 72% demonstrate a positive influence on market-based performance indicators. These positive findings are consistent with established theoretical frameworks, including signaling theory, legitimacy theory, and stakeholder theory. According to signaling theory, market signals that reduce information asymmetry assist investors in making more informed decisions. Sustainability reporting enables firms to transmit positive signals to the market, thereby reducing information asymmetry and potentially enhancing firm value. Furthermore, legitimacy theory posits that firms operate with the implicit approval of society and must continuously demonstrate their legitimacy to avoid the loss of social support. In this context, companies may disclose additional information to maintain legitimacy, which can ultimately lead to higher firm value. Consequently, firms that engage in sustainability reporting can reinforce their legitimacy and enhance value creation. Similarly, stakeholder theory suggests that a firm’s survival depends on its ability to meet the expectations of its stakeholders. This perspective emphasizes that firms must engage in corporate social responsibility activities, beyond the sole objective of maximizing shareholder wealth, to address the interests of non-financial stakeholders who can provide critical resources and support. Overall, these findings provide empirical support for signaling, legitimacy, and stakeholder theories and underscore the importance of policymakers encouraging or mandating sustainability reporting disclosures to enhance market transparency and efficiency.
Conclusion
Based on the consistent evidence of a positive relationship between sustainability reporting on financial performance, the reviewed studies provide important implications for both policymakers and corporate managers. Several studies suggest that sustainability reporting can function as an effective risk mitigation mechanism, particularly in uncertain and volatile business environments. Accordingly, sustainability reporting is framed not merely as a regulatory obligation but as a strategic resource capable of enhancing financial performance. Firms are therefore encouraged to develop long-term strategies for the implementation of sustainability reporting. From a policy perspective, governments are urged to strengthen and refine existing regulatory frameworks to establish a robust foundation for sustainability reporting practices. Collectively, these studies strongly support the view that corporate sustainability disclosure constitutes a strategic tool for increasing firm value and sustaining competitive advantage. Another key implication emerging from the literature concerns the role of regulation in improving transparency and corporate performance. Empirical evidence indicates that adherence to the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) standards in sustainability disclosures is associated with higher firm value, highlighting the importance of standardization and transparency in building investor confidence. Furthermore, several studies advocate the integration of multiple reporting frameworks as a means of enhancing disclosure quality and value creation. Finally, a number of studies emphasize the differentiated effects of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) dimensions, arguing that ESG considerations should be systematically incorporated into corporate financial planning, regulatory design, and investment decision-making to achieve long-term outcomes.
Accounting report
zahra joudaki chegeni; mohammad hossein safarzadeh; Hamideh AsnaAshari; Fakhroddin MohammadRezaei
Abstract
Considering the scientific and practical significance of research in this field, conducting a bibliometric analysis aimed at mapping the global status, trends, factors, and bibliographic relationships within this domain is necessary and has not yet been comprehensively addressed. In this study, articles ...
Read More
Considering the scientific and practical significance of research in this field, conducting a bibliometric analysis aimed at mapping the global status, trends, factors, and bibliographic relationships within this domain is necessary and has not yet been comprehensively addressed. In this study, articles published in the research domain were collected from the Scopus database for the period spanning 1986 to 2024. Subsequently, to enable a more focused analysis, 38 articles closely aligned with this area were selected. The VOSviewer software was employed for the bibliometric analysis. Based on the bibliometric analysis, the keyword "merger" emerged as a core term, surrounded by other closely related major nodes such as "audit firm merger," "audit quality," "audit fees," "audit efficiency," and "competition," all directly linked to the main research theme. The United States, the Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, and the fields of business, management, and accounting were identified as the most influential in this research area. Additionally, among researchers, Moroney demonstrated the highest level of collaboration with Simnett and Thavapalan. This study elucidates the intellectual and conceptual structure of audit firm mergers, highlighting emerging topics such as auditor-client alignment, audit regulation, market share, auditor switching, and audit efficiency. The findings of this research provide a relatively comprehensive overview of the literature on audit firm mergers throughout its evolution, while also offering future research directions for scholars.IntroductionRegulators and critics of mergers often express concern that a merged audit firm, due to its enhanced market position, may harm its clients. Following a merger, the number of audit service providers decreases, making it more difficult for audit clients to switch to an alternative and appropriate audit firm at more reasonable audit costs. The merger of audit firms has become one of the key concerns in the auditing profession and has attracted the attention of recent studies. Studies related to the merger of audit firms can be categorized into several phases. These phases include the pre-merger stage (antecedents), the merger stage (agreements), and the post-merger stage (consequences). A review of prior research suggests that the post-merger phase of audit firm mergers has predominantly attracted researchers’ attention. Despite numerous studies on the consequences of audit firm mergers, a research gap remains in the area of antecedents and agreements in these mergers. Therefore, given the scientific and practical importance of research in this field, a bibliometric analysis aimed at mapping the global discourse on audit firm mergers and their bibliographic relationships is essential; however, this topic has not been thoroughly explored. This study, by providing a comprehensive overview of the status of audit firm merger research, identifying existing gaps in the literature, and revealing future research trends, serves as a valuable resource for researchers. Moreover, the present study highlights the evolution and trajectory of research related to the literature on audit firm mergers. Method The present study employs a bibliometric methodology within a literature review approach. This quantitative method of reviewing the literature advances understanding of the intellectual structure and evolution of a specific academic field. It aids in visualizing data and performing thematic analyses to better understand the content of research related to audit firm mergers. Additionally, it provides valuable insights for researchers in this domain. In this paper, the process of identifying, screening, qualifying, and analyzing data was systematically implemented. The researchers initiated the process by selecting the Scopus database to collect information from relevant articles. Scopus was chosen as the bibliometric data source due to its applicability across various academic fields and, in this study, for examining the literature on this topic. Initially, a search was conducted to identify articles related to the specified domain. To execute the search, the terms “audit firm mergers,” “audit firm integrations,” “audit firm acquisitions,” “audit firm consolidations,” and “professional services firm mergers” were used in the titles, abstracts, and keywords of articles indexed in the Scopus database. Next, inclusion criteria were established, and articles were filtered based on the 1986–2024 timeframe. More precisely, based on the literature review, only articles published during this period were selected. Subsequently, English was designated as the language criterion, and the type of publication was restricted to peer-reviewed research articles. As a result, only English-language research articles published in the fields of business, management, and accounting; economics, econometrics, and finance; and social sciences were considered for this study. The screening stage ultimately led to the identification of the targeted articles. To ensure their relevance, the titles and abstracts of the articles were reviewed, and irrelevant articles were excluded. Ultimately, 38 articles were included in the analysis. Based on the research process, the final stage involved data analysis, which was performed using the Vosviewer software. Co-occurrence analysis, defined as the repetition of similar keywords across different articles, was conducted. Co-occurrence analysis and the identification of frequently used keywords highlight key research topics. Furthermore, co-citation analysis and co-authorship analysis were performed using the software. Specifically, if two keywords representing a particular research topic appeared simultaneously in a document, those keywords were considered to have a meaningful semantic relationship. FindingsThe progression of the literature on audit firm mergers indicates that this field was relatively underexplored until 2002. In other words, this topic did not receive significant attention from researchers before that year. Over time, as the importance of the subject matter examined in this research grew, the number of published articles showed an upward trend, reflecting the rising significance of the topic. From 2002 onward, the field has experienced fluctuating growth, suggesting that substantial research will continue to be conducted in this area through 2024 due to its critical importance. Among the countries contributing to the body of research, the United States leads with 20 publications, followed by the United Kingdom with 8, and Hong Kong with 6. Regarding research areas, the majority of articles pertain to business, management, and accounting (57.1%), followed by economics, econometrics, and finance (38.1%), and social sciences (4.8%). Most articles were published in reputable journals such as Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory (4 articles), Contemporary Accounting Research, and the Journal of Accounting and Public Policy (3 articles each). The keyword “mergers” emerged as the central theme, with closely associated major nodes such as audit firm mergers, audit quality, audit fees, audit efficiency, auditor-client alignment, the audit market, knowledge transfer, industry specialization, audit reporting delays, and audit market dynamics, all aligning with the primary focus of this study. In total, 89 authors have contributed to research on audit firm mergers, forming a collaborative network of researchers. The distribution of scholars within this field reveals that several authors have worked together on multiple projects. For instance, Moroney, in collaboration with Simnett and Thavapalan, has co-authored several studies and accounts for the highest number of publications in this domain. ConclusionThe present study systematically reviews articles on audit firm mergers published between 1986 and 2024, mapping the knowledge network through keyword co-occurrence analysis and co-authorship analysis. The keyword "mergers" was identified as the central theme, with closely related major nodes including audit firm mergers, audit quality, audit fees, audit efficiency, auditor-client alignment, the audit market, knowledge transfer, industry specialization, audit reporting delays, and audit market dynamics, all aligned with the primary focus of the study. The findings indicate that, while the topic of audit firm mergers was underexplored until 2002, interest in the field has shown an upward trajectory in subsequent years, reflecting its growing significance, with notable research activity expected to continue through 2024. The United States leads the field with 20 publications, followed by the Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory with four articles. The domain of business, management, and accounting accounts for 57.1% of publications, and prominent contributors include Moroney, Simnett, and Thavapalan, each with three highly relevant studies. Future research directions in this field should focus on emerging topics such as auditor-client alignment, market share, auditor switching, audit regulations, audit reporting delays, and audit efficiency. Based on the literature review, future investigations should aim to enhance academic awareness of approaches to audit firm mergers and the associated keywords. The results of this study offer a comprehensive overview of the literature on audit firm mergers over time, providing valuable insights for researchers regarding topic selection, potential collaborators, and research centers for potential funding opportunities.
Accounting report
Amin Ahmadpour; Seyedeh Mahboobeh Jafari; Fatemeh Sarraf
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of economic sanctions on tax evasion facilitated through Related-Party Transactions (RPTs) in Iran. Utilizing a novel hybrid framework that integrates graph mining, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and advanced fuzzy metaheuristic optimization, we analyze financial ...
Read More
This study investigates the impact of economic sanctions on tax evasion facilitated through Related-Party Transactions (RPTs) in Iran. Utilizing a novel hybrid framework that integrates graph mining, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and advanced fuzzy metaheuristic optimization, we analyze financial data from 1,780 companies (2016-2020). Graph mining is employed to map and detect suspicious transaction networks, particularly those involving Free Trade Zones (FTZs). A sanctions intensity index is constructed using PCA from 10 macroeconomic variables. The core predictive modeling leverages a Jaguar-optimized Type-3 Sheffer-like Type-4 fuzzy logic system to handle data uncertainty and non-linear relationships. Results indicate that sanctions exacerbate RPT-based tax evasion, increasing its magnitude from 0.389% to 0.414%. The proposed Jaguar model demonstrated superior performance with 98.8% accuracy (MSFE: 0.012), significantly outperforming traditional detection methods. Post-sanctions network topology analysis revealed a marked increase in suspicious clusters and nodes, with prevalent evasion patterns including multi-layer transfer pricing and abnormal profitability in FTZ subsidiaries. This research offers a robust, scalable tool for tax authorities to prioritize audits and enhances the understanding of how macroeconomic shocks influence illicit financial behaviors within corporate networks.IntroductionEconomic sanctions are coercive measures imposed by states to restrict international activities of target nations, offering a lower-risk alternative to military conflict (Cordesman et al., 2011). Iran exemplifies this, facing escalating sanctions that incentivize tax evasion through Related-Party Transactions (RPTs). Under sanctions, firms exploit legal gaps and accrual accounting to manipulate profits (Abeysekera, 2003; Arabi et al., 2018), transforming Iran’s financial market into a complex network (Soleimani et al., 2014). Traditional analytical methods fail against such complexity, while metaheuristic models excel. Graph mining uniquely uncovers hidden dimensions in sanctioned markets by analyzing network structures and variable relationships (Hu et al., 2022), especially where information asymmetry impedes tax authorities (Iacovacci & Lacasa, 2019; Yang & Xu, 2024).RPTs occur in nested networks with non-linear relationships (e.g., shared boards, cross-ownership) (Ruan et al., 2019). Sanctions amplify complexity through layered tactics like free trade zones (FTZs) and multi-layer transfer pricing (e.g., sequential sales at non-arm’s length prices) (Chan et al., 2016; Tian et al., 2016). Non-disclosure of ~68% key RPT information (e.g., pricing logic) exacerbates tax avoidance (Barokah, 2013), enabling profit shifting to foreign affiliates and eroding tax bases (Yang & Xu, 2024).Although RPTs can be economically justified (Gordon et al., 2004a), they risk abuse for private gain (Djankov et al., 2008; Barokah, 2013). In Iran, firms use subsidiaries in FTZs (e.g., Kish, Chabahar) and transfer pricing under Article 132-T of Iran’s Direct Taxation Law to shift profits: e.g., selling goods below market to affiliates, which then export at global prices, registering profits offshore. Weak oversight and fragmented databases hinder monitoring, but Iran’s Taxpayers’ Integrated System (TIS) provides foundational data for analysis.This study proposes a novel framework combining graph mining (to detect high-risk FTZ firms) and Type-3 Sheffer-like Type-4 fuzzy logic (to model tax data uncertainty) optimized by the Jaguar metaheuristic algorithm. It identifies suspicious groups exhibiting structural (e.g., nested ownership) and behavioral (e.g., abnormal pricing) tax evasion patterns, aligning with Iran’s Comprehensive Tax Plan for risk-based audits.Research Questions:Do economic sanctions increase RPT-based tax evasion?How can advanced data analytics identify and model these hidden patterns? Theoretical Framework2.1. Related-Party Transactions (RPTs)Per Iranian Accounting Standard 12 (Audit Organization, 2020), RPTs involve entities with control/influence over financial decisions. Key groups include:Parent/subsidiary entities under shared control.Key management personnel and relatives.Entities with significant economic/management ties.Two theoretical perspectives exist:- Agency Theory:RPTs enable opportunism by insiders (Jensen & Meckling, 1976), e.g., underpriced asset sales (Cheung et al., 2006).- Efficiency View: RPTs reduce transaction costs (Gordon et al., 2004a) but require disclosure to mitigate information asymmetry (Kohlbeck & Mayhew, 2010).Empirical evidence confirms RPTs facilitate tax avoidance via transfer pricing (Harris et al., 1993; Jian & Wong, 2010), especially in low-tax jurisdictions (Barker et al., 2016).2.2. Sanctions’ Economic ImpactSanctions restrict input access, raise production costs (Parsa et al., 2013), contract import-reliant sectors (Caetano et al., 2023), and reduce total factor productivity (Nosratabadi, 2023). They incentivize shifting activities to the informal economy, causing technical inefficiency (Markus, 2024). Methodology3.1. Data & Variables- Dependent Variable: Tax evasion, measured by the tax gap (difference between declared and final tax) per OECD standards (Slemrod & Weber, 2012).- Independent Variable: RPT volume (Iranian Accounting Standard 12).- Moderator: Sanctions index (PCA-derived from 10 macroeconomic variables, Table 1).Data: 16,756 RPTs from 1,780 Iranian firms (2016–2020), including:523 firms in FTZs (zero tax rate under Article 132-T).1,257 non-FTZ firms with shared boards.Financial data (net sales, COGS, operating profit) sourced confidentially from Iran’s National Tax Administration (INTA).3.2. Integrated FrameworkGraph Mining:Construct transaction networks (nodes = firms; edges = RPTs weighted by price deviation).Identify high-risk clusters(e.g., firms in FTZs with below-market pricing).PCA for Sanctions Index:- Combine 10 macroeconomic variables (e.g., oil exports, currency volatility) into a unified index.- 2 principal components explain 85% variance (Table 1, Chart 3). Fuzzy Metaheuristic Optimization:- Apply Type-3 Sheffer-like Type-4 fuzzy logic to model data uncertainty (e.g., transfer pricing discrepancies).- Optimize via Jaguar algorithm (multi-objective: minimize prediction error [MSFE], maximize detection accuracy).- Output: Dynamic risk index (transaction volume, price deviation, geographic concentration). Results & Discussion- The analysis confirmed that sanctions significantly intensified RPT-based tax evasion, elevating its level from 0.389% (pre-sanctions) to 0.414% (post-sanctions). This 0.025% increase, though seemingly small, represents a substantial rise in hidden economic activity within the constrained environment.- The Jaguar model achieved 98.8% accuracy (error rate: 0.012), outperforming traditional methods (40% vs. 74.6% detection rate).- Graph analysis revealed post-sanctions topological shifts: increased suspicious nodes/clusters (Chart 4).- Key evasion patterns:- Multi-layer transfer pricing (e.g., mother → FTZ subsidiary → export).- Abnormal profitability in FTZ subsidiaries.- Geographic concentration in low-tax areas. Conclusion & Policy Implications5.1. Key FindingsSanctions intensify RPT-based tax evasion by incentivizing complex, hidden transaction networks. The integrated graph-fuzzy-jaguar framework proves superior to linear models in detecting evasion under data uncertainty.5.2. Innovations- First application of Type-3 fuzzy logic in taxation.- Dynamic risk index for audit prioritization.- Operational compatibility with INTA’s existing systems (e.g., TIS).5.3. Recommendations- To INTA:Integrating the model into a blockchain-based real-time monitoring platform and Develop an AI dashboard with risk-tiered visualization (green/yellow/red).- Domestic Policy: Mandating disclosure of transfer pricing logic and topological RPT networks and establishing a National Networked Data Analysis Center.- International Cooperation:Leveraging double-taxation agreements for cross-border data exchange.- Future Research: Extending the model to multinational contexts and designing "tax resilience indices" for sanction-affected economies.
Financial Accounting
Pouyan Mohammadi; hamideh asnaashari; MohammadHosien SafarZade
Abstract
The purpose of financial reporting is to present commercial realities. Meanwhile, there is growing concern about the complexities involved in financial reporting. To this end, the present study set out to explain the complexity pattern of financial reporting by drawing upon a grounded theory approach. ...
Read More
The purpose of financial reporting is to present commercial realities. Meanwhile, there is growing concern about the complexities involved in financial reporting. To this end, the present study set out to explain the complexity pattern of financial reporting by drawing upon a grounded theory approach. The statistical population of the study includes 26 experts in the field of financial reporting. The data for the research were collected using semi-structured interviews. The findings identified the complexity of financial reporting as encompassing 12 causes: understanding the concept of complexity, preparers' knowledge, the company's capital structure, cooperation between institutions, the standard-setting body, the legislative body, the accounting standards, the structure of internal controls, the company's financial position, the company's board of directors, the auditors' skills, and the users' ability to identify it as causal conditions. Then, according to the contextual conditions (macro, industry, company, and reporting structure) and intervening conditions (informing practices, characteristics of the Chief Financial Officer, macro factors, and new technologies), several strategies (appropriate report format, appropriate standardization, application of laws and regulations, and empowerment of human resources and control structure) were developed. Afterward, the consequences, including outcomes at the macroeconomic level, expense reduction, company level, societal level, international level, and report level, were determined, and the final pattern was presented accordingly.IntroductionFinancial statements should contain sufficient detail to help users analyze and evaluate the company’s performance results and financial position in order to make informed economic decisions (Mutiso & Kamao, 2013). The complexity of financial statements indicates the increasing difficulty in understanding, interpreting, and predicting financial statements (Filzen & Peterson, 2015). Glassman (2006) states that the main concern regarding the complexity of financial reporting is that if financial statements are complex and distort business and economic reality, capital will be used inefficiently, resources will be misallocated, investors will pay a high opportunity cost by investing in companies with unrealistic values, customers and suppliers will make important and strategic business decisions based on a flawed picture of economic reality, creditors will not be able to price loans according to the real risk assumed, and employees will make employment, retirement, and investment decisions based on an incorrect view of the employer's financial outlook. Complexity in financial reporting has many negative consequences for users of financial reports. Given the increasing complexity of the business environment and consequently of financial reports, in such circumstances, users need understandable reports on which they can make informed decisions. Providing a comprehensive model of financial reporting complexity can help users of financial reports reduce the level of complexity they face. Therefore, the problem addressed in the present study is the lack of such a comprehensive model. The main questions that arise are: What are the complex areas of financial reporting? What factors cause financial reports to become complex? And what is the comprehensive model of financial reporting complexity?Research QuestionsWhat is the comprehensive model of factors affecting the complexity of financial reporting?Literature ReviewManagers may structure annual reports opportunistically and intentionally complicate financial reports in order to hide negative information from investors. When a company’s performance is poor, managers have an incentive to present information in an ambiguous manner, as the market may react slowly to information that is disclosed in a complex way. In other words, managers tend to obscure undesirable information by presenting complicated and ambiguous reports. In fact, they may attempt to conceal poor performance by increasing the volume of unnecessary information in annual financial reports. According to the management obfuscation hypothesis, managers present information they are reluctant to disclose in an ambiguous and incomplete manner to reduce the users' understanding of financial reports (Li, 2008). Existing accounting standards provide rules and guidelines on how companies should report. However, management still has discretion in deciding how to present financial information. Based on the opportunistic perspective of the positive accounting theory, managers choose the reporting method that suits their personal interests. As a result, they may publish financial information in a way that misleads investors (Pajuste et al., 2020). The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have all proposed projects to simplify and reduce the amount of information disclosed in financial reports. The Chairman of the FASB, Russell Golden, stated that “overly complex financial statements often hide important information that investors need to make appropriate decisions about capital allocation. A complex, opaque, and ambiguous standard also makes it difficult for preparers of financial statements to understand it, and even when an accounting procedure is clear, its use can be long, difficult, and costly” (Murphy, 2015).Research MethodologyThe present study is descriptive in terms of its fundamental purpose, descriptive in terms of data collection, and qualitative in nature, using the grounded theory method to analyze the data. Grounded theory refers to a theory derived from data that has been systematically collected and analyzed during the research process, involving a continuous back-and-forth between the data and emerging insights (Khanifar & Moslemi, 2019). This study develops and presents a comprehensive model of financial reporting complexity that includes causal factors, contextual factors, intervening factors, strategies, and consequences. It is also a cross-sectional study, as the interviews were conducted in 2024.Results and DiscussionThe findings showed that the financial reporting complexity model consists of 30 components. Causal factors affecting the complexity of financial reporting include understanding the concept of complexity, preparers' knowledge, the company's capital structure, cooperation between institutions, the standard-setting body, the legislative body, the accounting standards, the structure of internal controls, the company's financial position, the company's board of directors, the auditors' skill, and the users’ ability. Contextual conditions include the macro context, industry context, company context, and reporting structure context. Intervening conditions include informing practices, characteristics of the Chief Financial Officer, macro factors, and new technologies. Strategies to reduce the complexity of financial reporting include adopting an appropriate report format, appropriate standardization, application of laws and regulations, and empowerment of human resources and the control structure. Finally, the consequences, including the outcomes at the macroeconomic level, expense reduction, company level, societal level, international level, and report level, were identified, and the final model was presented accordingly.ConclusionGiven the lack of a uniform definition and understanding of the complexity of financial reports, this has been identified as one of the causal factors affecting the complexity of financial reports. The second causal component is the preparers’ knowledge of financial reports. The more specialized knowledge (in accounting and finance) and experience financial managers possess, the clearer and less complex the financial reports are. Financial managers with greater knowledge and experience tend to make more appropriate and understandable disclosures in financial reports. The third causal component is the company's capital structure. It is expected that private companies and those not accountable to a wide range of stakeholders will publish more complex financial reports. In contrast, companies that are accountable to various stakeholders are subject to greater scrutiny, encouraging preparers to produce more transparent reports. The fourth to seventh components include the lack of cooperation between different institutions, the standard-setting body, the legislative body, and the accounting standards, respectively. Cooperation among institutions involved in financial reporting can reduce complexity, by fostering a unified disclosure framework across all industries. In addition, some accounting standards and areas are inherently complex (ACCA, 2009), for example, Hedge Accounting (IAS39), Share-Based Payments (IFRS2), and Pension Accounting (IAS19). The eighth component is the structure of internal controls. Companies with strong and well-designed internal control systems tend to present more transparent financial reports. The ninth component is the company's overall financial situation. Companies facing unfavorable financial conditions may manipulate their reports to appear more stable. The tenth component is the company's board of directors. In companies where the board members possess relevant knowledge, education, and accounting experience, financial report monitoring is generally more effective. The eleventh component is the auditors' skills. Auditors with higher levels of education and expertise are expected to examine financial reports more rigorously and ensure compliance with disclosure guidelines and accounting standards. The twelfth component is the users’ ability. If users of financial reports have higher education and possess up-to-date knowledge in various fields, particularly in finance and accounting, they are more likely to understand and analyze financial reports effectively. As a result, the perceived complexity of the reports is reduced for them.
Accounting report
Jafar Babajani; Mohammad Javad Salimi; Mhammad taghi Taghavi fard; Ehsan Mohebi
Abstract
Regional Electric companies are organizations that pursue both social and financial goals in order to fulfill their assigned missions, so fulfilling accountability for their dual goals is of fundamental importance. In this research, by examining the information needs of the users of the financial reports, ...
Read More
Regional Electric companies are organizations that pursue both social and financial goals in order to fulfill their assigned missions, so fulfilling accountability for their dual goals is of fundamental importance. In this research, by examining the information needs of the users of the financial reports, the factors affecting the financial reporting of the sector have been studied. The aim of this research is to present a model for the environmental conditions and characteristics of regional electric companies in Iran. For this purpose, the required data, after a library study and exploratory search in the theoretical foundations and financial and accounting rules and regulations governing the relations of these entities, were collected using a questionnaire and analyzed using the fuzzy Delphi research method and appropriate statistical tests. The evidence from the analysis of the respondents’ views shows that the influencing factors are in four dimensions, including the compatibility of the model in achieving the organization's goals, the needs of information users, compliance with financial and accounting laws and regulations, and finally, budget control and credit status reporting. Experts also agree on the factors proposed by this research for designing and explaining the financial reporting model of regional power companies in Iran.Introduction The government and other public sector institutions provide many goods and services essential to society. One of the most significant areas in which the government engages in commercial activities is the energy sector, particularly the electricity industry, which plays a key role in social and economic development and in improving the quality of life in society. The financial resources of the country’s regional electricity companies are derived from various sources and must be utilized for specific purposes in compliance with various laws and regulations.Given the fundamental importance of performance and the evaluation of accountability by authorities to stakeholders in democratic governments, it is necessary to produce clear and reliable reports on how resources are allocated and consumed in different areas. This research seeks to identify the weaknesses and shortcomings of the financial statements of these institutions by reviewing existing literature and employing other methods. Ultimately, the study presents a suitable model for the financial reporting of these institutions, enabling improved accountability and more effective economic decision-making.Research QuestionWhat is the financial reporting model of Iran's regional electricity companies?Literature ReviewSayedi and Babajani (2011) conducted research with the aim of achieving a desirable model of financial reporting in Islamic capital markets. The findings of their research confirmed the usefulness of relying on the fund theory to achieve reporting goals. The result of their study led to a financial reporting model in which the central focus is not the economic entity but rather the main business activities and departments of the company.Babajani and Shekarkhah (2012), using the Delphi method, investigated the appropriate accounting model for Islamic banking in Iran. According to their findings, the accounting system used by experts was unable to meet user needs and required changes, the generalities of which were presented as key factors in the proposed research model. Additionally, the research indicated that a conceptual framework based on accountability is more suitable than one based on decision-usefulness for financial reporting in the usury-free banking system.Mohammadi et al. (2020), in their research to develop a desirable model of financial reporting in the public sector, addressed the key factors influencing public sector financial reporting. The results showed that the quality of public sector financial reporting is influenced by factors such as budgeting structure, public sector infrastructure, the quality of human resources, the accounting system and basis, education, and the accountability system governing society. Weaknesses identified in the research include poor implementation of accrual accounting, incomplete implementation of operational budgeting, political influence in decision-making processes, lack of access to the annual budget performance statement and budget deduction report, and non-identification of certain financial statement items.MethodologyThe current research is an applied and developmental study. It aims to analyze existing conditions and assist in the decision-making process, classifying it as descriptive research. Furthermore, since it seeks to gather the opinions of a large statistical community on the research subject, it is categorized as descriptive-survey research.Using the fuzzy Delphi method, the statistical population includes experts selected based on three criteria: the presence of representatives from expert groups, deep knowledge of the research topic, and breadth of opinion and expertise. These experts were chosen from groups such as auditors, the head of the State Court of Audit, auditors of executive bodies, directors of audit organizations, and academic faculty members with relevant experience. Participants were selected through snowball sampling.Initially, to identify the dimensions, components, and indicators of the Financial Reporting Model for Regional Electric Companies in Iran, a review of the subject literature was conducted. After identification, examples of these cases in the public sector were examined based on expert opinions. Given the advantages of the fuzzy Delphi method (29FDM) compared to the traditional Delphi method (30TDM), the fuzzy Delphi method was employed in this research.ResultsBy examining the needs of users and the current state of financial reporting for regional electric companies, which is affected by several factors, it was found that the financial reporting models of private sector for-profit institutions cannot fully address the information needs of users in this sector. The findings of this research revealed that the operating environment and user needs in this sector differ significantly from those of private-sector for-profit institutions. These differences have created challenges in aligning the information needs of users with the form and content of the current financial reports, leaving report users facing difficulties.In this research, by identifying and analyzing the factors influencing an appropriate financial reporting model for Iran's regional electric companies, a step has been taken to better meet the information needs of users. Identifying the set of influencing factors for the proposed model, in accordance with the conditions and laws governing the financial and accounting systems of this sector, and determining the importance of each factor in the desired framework are among the key findings of this research effort.DiscussionAccording to the findings of the research, the consistency of the model in reporting the degree of achievement of the set goals of regional electric companies, the consistency in supporting the goals of information users, its compliance with financial and accounting rules and regulations, as well as budget control and credit status reporting, were identified as the effective dimensions of the reporting model. Each of these dimensions comprises several components and indicators.ConclusionThis research aimed to present a financial reporting model for Regional Electric Companies in Iran. Using the fuzzy Delphi method and based on expert opinions, the dimensions, components, and indicators of the proposed model were identified and presented.
Accounting report
Seyed Ali Hosseini; Shima Ahmadi; Hossein Seilsepoor
Abstract
Given the significance of sustainability reporting, there has been a notable increase in studies in this field. However, due to shortcomings in initial studies, it is not feasible to make decisions based solely on their findings. This research provides a comprehensive examination of the impact of corporate ...
Read More
Given the significance of sustainability reporting, there has been a notable increase in studies in this field. However, due to shortcomings in initial studies, it is not feasible to make decisions based solely on their findings. This research provides a comprehensive examination of the impact of corporate governance structures on sustainability reporting, based on the results of previous studies. Ownership structure, board of directors, management characteristics, corporate governance performance, and the quality of internal controls are identified as influential factors. While the research literature has reached a consensus on the impact of some factors, it has encountered contradictory findings regarding others.IntroductionIn recent years, the issue of sustainability has garnered global attention, becoming a central focus for many accounting researchers. International organizations have published sustainability reporting standards, and many stock exchanges worldwide now consider sustainability reporting a prerequisite for listing. Companies publish sustainability reports for various reasons, including transparency with stakeholders (Kuo et al., 2016), reputation (De Grosbois & Fennell, 2022), legal compliance (Harjoto et al., 2020), or alignment with emerging trends (Busco et al., 2019).However, due to the voluntary nature of sustainability reporting in many countries, concerns about the quantity and quality of this information persist. Since management often decides whether to publish sustainability reports, when to publish them, the publication platform, and the content and scope of the reports, voluntary disclosure, and impression management strategies provide significant opportunities for managers to obscure poor sustainability performance. Therefore, mechanisms are necessary to ensure that the information provided in sustainability reports is of high quality.Corporate governance mechanisms, such as ownership structure, ownership concentration, audit quality, and board composition and quality, play a critical role in reducing opportunistic behaviors by controlling and monitoring executive managers. Given the importance of corporate governance mechanisms for sustainability reporting, there has been a recent surge in studies exploring this relationship.However, early studies in this field are often limited by shortcomings such as researcher bias, small sample sizes, differences in legal frameworks, and contradictory findings. These limitations hinder the ability to make reliable decisions based on their results, highlighting the need for more comprehensive research. Accordingly, this study provides a systematic review of the impact of corporate governance structures on sustainability reporting, synthesizing findings from prior research.The main research questions are as follows:What are the most frequent keywords in the field of sustainability reporting over time?What are the most frequent keywords in the field of the relationship between corporate governance structures and sustainability reporting over time?which corporate governance mechanisms influence the adoption, quantity, and quality of sustainability reporting?MethodologyThis study is applied research and follows an interpretive paradigm. Aligned with this paradigm, a qualitative research methodology was chosen, incorporating systematic review and content analysis for data collection, as well as bibliometric analysis to identify trends in sustainability reporting research and leading authors in the field.The research sample comprises 47 international and 32 national articles published between 2013 and September 2023. Domestic studies were selected through keyword searches on the websites of journals approved by the Ministry of Science, while international studies were sourced from the ScienceDirect database. To enhance search sensitivity and comprehensiveness, various keywords, the "OR" operator, and truncations of selected keywords were employed in ScienceDirect. Both quantitative and qualitative research articles were reviewed. Following the example of other literature reviews (Han & Cohen, 2013:8), books and editorial notes were excluded, with only peer-reviewed articles considered. The latest version of the PRISMA checklist (2020) was used to guide the development of the review protocol.To identify hot research topics in sustainability reporting, research topics exploring the relationship between corporate governance structures and sustainability reporting, and the most prominent authors in the field, bibliographic analysis, and VOSviewer software were utilized.Results and DiscussionExamining the hot topics in sustainability reporting has revealed that corporate governance structures have been among the most significant areas of focus in recent years. Bibliographic analysis indicates that mechanisms such as the board of directors, assurance, and risk management have been key topics of interest for authors.A review of past studies shows that factors such as ownership structure, board of directors, management characteristics, gender diversity, corporate governance performance, assurance, monitoring and accountability, corporate risk, and internal control quality significantly affect the adoption, quantity, and quality of sustainability reports. For example, ownership structure encompasses institutional ownership, internal ownership, foreign ownership, ownership concentration, the relative power of minority shareholders, shareholder identity similarity, state ownership, capital market acceptance, family ownership, fund ownership, and ownership by other companies. Similar detailed categorizations exist for other factors.Most studies have focused on the influence of corporate governance mechanisms on the adoption of sustainability reporting, while fewer have examined their impact on report quality. There is a consensus among researchers on the impact of certain governance mechanisms, such as board size and independence, sustainability committees, managerial compensation, and gender diversity, on sustainability reporting. However, regarding the influence of other factors, the research literature contains contradictory findings. Additionally, for some factors, such as the number of managers, managers’ religious attitudes, and audit fees, the limited number of studies makes it difficult to draw definitive conclusions. Information on measurement indicators based on sample studies is also provided, aiding researchers in measurement purposes.Given the widespread impact of corporate governance structures on sustainability reporting, governments, and regulators should implement initiatives to influence board structures and other corporate governance mechanisms. The findings suggest that investors seeking to maximize their returns should invest in companies with strong corporate governance structures. This study enhances the understanding of managers, regulators, and stakeholders regarding the role of corporate governance in sustainability reporting and provides valuable insights for regulators and policymakers concerned about achieving sustainability reporting goals.By summarizing the impact of corporate governance structures on sustainability reporting, this study identifies gaps in the research literature and mechanisms requiring further investigation. Additionally, juxtaposing findings from domestic and international studies, it highlights cultural differences in the effects of corporate governance mechanisms. Analyzing the findings of this study while considering its limitations is crucial. Existing studies in the research sample employed various measures to assess the quality and extent of sustainability reporting. The documentation reviewed as sustainability reports also varies. For instance, some researchers analyzed sustainability reports, while others examined information provided on company websites. Domestic researchers, due to the lack of sustainability reports published by companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, have relied on analyzing board reports and financial statements to assess the extent and quality of sustainability reporting. Since measurement procedures affect the results obtained and, consequently, the findings of this study, these limitations must be considered when interpreting the results. ConclusionThe analysis of contradictory findings can be explained by considering management motives, organizational maturity levels, organizational structure, and institutional factors affecting the organization, such as industry type, country of operation, and regulations. Therefore, using standardized measures for companies operating in diverse institutional contexts is unlikely to be effective.
Accounting report
Mohammad hossein Setayesh; Younes Masoudi; Elias Dehdari; Mina Sadeghi
Abstract
This research explores the impact of mental accounting on audit quality, particularly focusing on how auditors' cognitive biases influence their judgments and decision-making. By understanding these biases, auditors can better identify risks and improve audit processes. The study is applied, quantitative, ...
Read More
This research explores the impact of mental accounting on audit quality, particularly focusing on how auditors' cognitive biases influence their judgments and decision-making. By understanding these biases, auditors can better identify risks and improve audit processes. The study is applied, quantitative, and descriptive, conducted through surveys with 203 certified accountants in Iran. The findings indicate that mental accounting affects auditors' judgments, the allocation of partners' working time, and performance defense costs in lawsuits, but it does not impact auditor independence. The research concludes that mental accounting influences overall audit quality. By increasing auditors' awareness of mental accounting and its effects, the quality of their audits can improve. These insights highlight the importance of recognizing behavioral biases in auditing to enhance the effectiveness and accuracy of audit practices. IntroductionIn a world without audits, trust in financial reporting would erode, leading to chaos in financial statements. Audit quality is essential for ensuring reliability and transparency, serving as a safeguard against errors and fraud. Understanding auditors' cognitive processes, particularly mental accounting, is crucial for enhancing audit quality and improving decision-making in the classification of financial resources.In the 1980s, Richard Thaler and Amos Tursky popularized the concept of mental accounting, demonstrating how mental limitations can lead to irrational financial decisions. This theory, widely accepted by psychologists, economists, and auditors, consists of three key elements: the coding, classification, and evaluation of mental accounts. Additionally, expectations theory addresses decision-making under risk. By understanding mental accounts, auditors can gain valuable insights into financial behaviors, ultimately improving audit quality. This makes mental accounting a vital tool for combating financial abuses and enhancing overall financial integrity.Research hypothesesMental accounting influences audit quality.Mental accounting affects the auditor's judgment.Mental accounting impacts the ratio of partners' work time to the total work time in the audit budget.Mental accounting influences the auditor's independence.Mental accounting affects the process of defending performance costs in lawsuits.Literature ReviewAudit quality is rooted in trust and confidence, stemming from auditors' adherence to professional standards and their ability to provide reliable information. It can be likened to a trustworthy friend who keeps promises, relying on key elements such as competence, independence, honesty, and professional skepticism. Definitions of audit quality vary but generally emphasize auditors’ ability to detect violations and ensure high-quality financial reporting. Compliance with audit standards serves as a key indicator of audit quality. Furthermore, the theory of mental accounting enhances audit quality by enabling auditors to better understand financial processes and how individuals categorize their resources, making it a valuable tool for improving overall audit practices.Integrating mental accounting with audit quality can significantly enhance the audit process and build trust in financial reporting. Mental accounting identifies behavioral biases that influence auditors' decision-making by examining how financial resources and decisions are categorized. By recognizing these biases, auditors can implement strategies to mitigate their effects, thereby improving audit quality. Additionally, applying mental accounting principles helps auditors select effective methods for gathering and interpreting evidence, ensuring more reliable and accurate audits. This synergy fosters greater accuracy and reliability in financial reports, ultimately strengthening public trust in the audit system.MethodologyThis research adopts an applied approach and a survey method to enhance auditing knowledge, focusing on partners, managers, and certified accountants from A-grade audit institutions in Iran. Data collection was conducted using a questionnaire, whose validity was confirmed through face validity and necessary revisions. Reliability was established using Cronbach's alpha, ensuring the questionnaire is a reliable tool for measuring the research variables.ConclusionThis research highlights the role of mental accounting in enhancing audit quality, building on Thaler's foundational work. It identifies four specific variables to measure audit quality, demonstrating that mental accounting affects auditors' judgments, partners' work time allocation, and defense costs in lawsuits, but not auditor independence. The findings confirm that mental accounting positively influences audit quality, aligning with earlier studies by Bonabi Ghadim and Karbasi Yazdi (2013) and Stephen (2018).Additionally, the research examined the influence of participants' demographic information on the hypotheses, concluding that these factors did not affect the outcomes, as the results remained consistent across all demographic groups.AcknowledgmentsIn conclusion, we extend our gratitude to the partners, managers, and members of the public accountants’ community in Iran for their invaluable assistance and the generous time they dedicated to supporting this research.
Accounting report
Morteza Adlzadeh
Abstract
The complexities and continuous changes in the business environment have raised significant doubts about the ability of corporate reporting systems to meet stakeholders' needs. Additionally, the unique characteristics of Iran's economic environment necessitate careful consideration of the forces shaping ...
Read More
The complexities and continuous changes in the business environment have raised significant doubts about the ability of corporate reporting systems to meet stakeholders' needs. Additionally, the unique characteristics of Iran's economic environment necessitate careful consideration of the forces shaping the future of corporate reporting and appropriate policymaking by stakeholders. This research evaluates the policy options using a mixed-method approach, employing scenario analysis for corporate reporting in Iran. In the first stage, semi-structured interviews with experts and a fuzzy Delphi survey were conducted to identify the drivers affecting the future of corporate reporting in Iran. Next, using the Schwartz model, the importance and uncertainty of the key drivers were determined. The findings revealed that the three most critical and uncertain drivers are "increasing the connection with the global economy," "privatization of property," and "credit-oriented financial system". In the final stage, corporate reporting issues were categorized into five groups, and ten action options were developed. Robust planning analysis indicated that the optimal policy option includes expanding the target audience, prioritizing public interests, recognizing intangible assets, moving toward international standards, and advancing non-financial reporting with updated requirements. The results of this research offer valuable applications and recommendations for policymakers and stakeholders in corporate reporting. IntroductionCorporate reporting plays an essential role in the effective functioning of the global economy and significantly contributes to shaping our understanding of the current and future drivers of value creation in business and the financial sector. It is constantly evolving to meet the demands of a diverse and expanding range of users, with ongoing efforts to adapt reporting procedures to the continuous changes in the regulatory and business environment. Policymakers and various stakeholders in corporate reporting must develop innovative approaches for forecasting and policymaking, considering future developments in the field. In this context, there is a growing demand for increased transparency and improved reporting mechanisms. Consequently, professional and academic authorities, standard-setting organizations, regulatory bodies, and other interested parties have begun conducting studies, proposing solutions, and establishing requirements to improve the corporate reporting system. Legislative institutions and standard-setting organizations have consistently aimed to provide standards and recommendations through an evolutionary process to enhance reporting and address the information needs of investors in resource allocation. Thus, The formulation of appropriate policies to accommodate changes in the corporate reporting system is critical. Corporate reporting requires well-informed decisions by policymakers to address these challenges. Based on this need, the main research questions of this study are as follows:What are the main scenarios for the possible future of corporate reporting in Iran's economic environment?According to different scenarios, what should be the appropriate policies for corporate reporting stakeholders?MethodologyThis study is applied research, employing a mixed methodology to achieve its objectives. Semi-structured interviews were conducted following the approach outlined by Kvale and Brinkman (2009) to identify the driving forces shaping the future of corporate reporting. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the interview data. For the qualitative analysis, appropriate methods aligned with Creswell (2008) approach were employed. In the second step, fuzzy Delphi analysis was conducted to reach a consensus on the identified drivers. Subsequently, to assess the level of importance and uncertainty, a questionnaire containing the list of consensus drivers was distributed to the experts who participated in the earlier stages of the research. The expert panel method was used to identify policy issues in corporate reporting, and corresponding action options were developed for each issue. The evaluation of these policy options was then carried out using a questionnaire tool based on expert opinions. The results from the questionnaire analysis were processed using MATLAB software, incorporating the development of a fuzzy inference system.ResultsDuring the exploratory interview phase with experts, 37 effective drivers of corporate reporting were identified. After two stages of fuzzy Delphi implementation, a total of 18 drivers were approved and agreed upon by the experts. These agreed-on drivers served as the foundation for developing scenarios based on the Schwartz model (1991). Among these, three drivers of "entering the global economic arena with the removal of sanctions," "privatization of ownership," and "changing the collateral-based financing system to a credit-based system" were identified as having both high importance and high uncertainty, making them the primary basis for developing distinct corporate reporting scenarios. Considering that three drivers are the basis for designing the scenarios. Given that each of these three drivers can exist in two possible states, a total of eight scenarios were designed. Five main corporate reporting challenges were identified to evaluate policy options, and ten action options were developed. Finally, based on the analysis of policy option evaluation using robust planning criteria, the best policy option was determined.ConclusionThe evaluation of different scenarios indicates that scenario number 1, characterized by increased linkage with the global economy, privatization of ownership, and credit-oriented financing, is a favorable scenario for corporate reporting. In this scenario, there is a more suitable platform, greater demand, and an improved environment for the development and advancement of corporate reporting. However, it is important to note that this scenario also raises expectations for corporate reporting. If these expectations are not adequately addressed, stakeholders may increasingly rely on alternative information mechanisms. Based on the analysis of policy options evaluated using robust planning criteria, the best policy option was identified. This option includes expanding the target audience group, prioritizing public interests, increasing recognition of intangible assets, adopting international standards, and advancing non-financial reporting types with new requirements. This policy option demonstrates appropriate and acceptable performance across different scenarios, making it the most suitable choice for corporate reporting.
Accounting report
Esmaeil Khoshbakht; Amirhossein Taebi naghandari
Abstract
The present study aims to investigate the effect of religious beliefs on the inaccuracy of accountants in preparing financial statements, with a focus on the mediating role of professional ethics in Iran. For this purpose, 400 questionnaires were designed and distributed among official accounting and ...
Read More
The present study aims to investigate the effect of religious beliefs on the inaccuracy of accountants in preparing financial statements, with a focus on the mediating role of professional ethics in Iran. For this purpose, 400 questionnaires were designed and distributed among official accounting and auditing professionals. The data was analyzed using Amos software. The findings indicate that religious beliefs have a negative and significant effect on accountants’ dishonesty and a positive and significant effect on their professional ethics. Additionally, the professional ethics of accountants is a factor that reduces inaccuracies in preparing financial statements, exerting a negative and significant effect. Finally, as a mediating variable, professional ethics explains the relationship between religious beliefs and accountants' dishonesty. The findings confirm that professional ethics serves as a partial mediator in this relationship.IntroductionFraud and inaccuracies in financial reporting have drawn significant attention in the accounting and auditing professions, particularly regarding their causes and the methods available to prevent fraudulent behavior. The inaccuracy of accountants is a multi-dimensional and complex phenomenon with various causes and effects, often leading to destructive consequences for business units and society.Increasing levels of inaccuracy in financial reporting have resulted in the bankruptcy of both large and small companies, raising concerns about the quality of financial statements. Consequently, identifying opportunities and possibilities to address accountants' inaccuracies in financial statements has become a key focus for creditors, investors, consultants, legislators, accountants, and other stakeholders.The expansion of morality and religiosity can often be more effective than laws, regulations, and standards in preventing inaccuracies. Accountants and auditors primarily follow laws and standards imposed by regulatory bodies such as the standards development committee and the auditing organization. However, these externally imposed standards may not always be fully accepted or embraced wholeheartedly. In contrast, religious and moral principles such as honesty and truthfulness are deeply rooted in personal beliefs. These principles often stem from family upbringing and are influenced by factors such as schooling, religion, and public or cultural institutions, which are deeply intertwined with native and natural structures. As a result, there is a stronger likelihood that auditors and accountants will adhere to religious and moral principles compared to externally imposed standards.Literature ReviewThe relationship between religiosity and religious beliefs can be analyzed through the theory of social norms. Social norm theory suggests that social norms influence people's behavior. It predicts that the religious beliefs of managers are shaped by the religious norms prevalent in their local geographical area. The importance of social and religious norms within a society plays a significant role in fostering people's adherence to these norms. By emphasizing the overall importance of moral behavior, faith-based beliefs provide specific guidelines and equip adherents with a framework for describing and understanding moral or immoral experiences.MethodologyThis research is one of the few studies that utilize the scientific method of construction and experimental proof, conducted based on pre-determined research hypotheses and plans. This type of research is appropriate when the data measurement criteria are quantitative, and statistical techniques are employed to extract results. Additionally, since the data for this study is collected through a questionnaire, it can be classified as survey research. In terms of its purpose, it falls within the applied research category.In this study, all official accounting and auditing justice experts working at the provincial centers across the country were considered as the statistical population. Using Cochran's formula, the sample size for the study was determined to be 385 individuals. To ensure caution, 400 questionnaires were distributed among the members of the statistical population. Given the existing limitations, the questionnaire was administered online through the Judiciary Research Center. Out of the respondents, 325 individuals completed the questionnaire, and the number of valid responses suitable for analysis was 312. It should be noted that 13 questionnaires were excluded due to incomplete information. Therefore, the total number of questionnaires used for statistical analysis in this study was 312.ResultsFigure 1 illustrates the regression coefficients and the paths related to the testing of research hypotheses. The variable of faith-based beliefs is considered an independent variable, the inaccuracy of accountants in financial reporting is the dependent variable, and professional ethics is the mediating variable. Path c represents the relationship between the independent and dependent variables in the absence of a mediating variable. Path a shows the relationship between the independent variable and the mediator, while path b indicates the relationship between the mediator and dependent variables. Additionally, path c' represents the relationship between the independent and dependent variables in the presence of the mediating variable. To test the research hypotheses in Amos software, three mediation models, the direct model and the indirect model were employed. These models were included in the present study, and the related findings were reported. The findings revealed that religious beliefs have a negative and significant effect on accountants’ dishonesty and a positive and significant effect on their professional ethics. Furthermore, the professional ethics of accountants, similar to religious beliefs, is a factor that reduces the inaccuracy of accountants in preparing financial statements and has a negative and significant effect on it. Finally, as a mediating variable, professional ethics explains the relationship between religious beliefs and accountants' dishonesty. The findings confirm that professional ethics is a partial mediator in this relationship.DiscussionThis research demonstrated how religiosity and professional ethics can effectively reduce the inaccuracy of accountants in preparing financial statements. The beliefs of accountants and preparers of financial statements can often have a greater impact than reporting laws and standards. Since accountants’ dishonesty has highly destructive effects on society, economic stability, and public trust, the findings of the research suggest that strengthening accountants’ faith and moral beliefs can help prevent this harmful factor.ConclusionAt first glance, it might be expected that an accountant with strong religious principles would demonstrate higher moral standards, thereby preventing them from preparing reports and financial statements that deviate from accounting principles. However, this is not always the case, and in some instances, the result may be the opposite. In reality, if religious beliefs alone do not enhance the moral system, they cannot effectively mitigate fraudulent behavior. In such situations, religiosity without moral commitment may manifest as hypocritical behaviors, which not only fails to reduce wrongdoing, but may even exacerbate it. Without ethical commitment, managers and accountants may manipulate financial statements to make them appear favorable, altering the numbers to avoid managerial threats without adhering to ethical principles.
Accounting report
Alireza Javadipour; jafar Babajani; Ghasem Blue; Vajhollah Ghorbanizadeh
Abstract
Considering the goals of forming the audit committee and its extensive duties, evaluating the performance of the audit committee in order to identify its strengths and weaknesses is very important. The present study presents a model for evaluating the performance of the audit committee and a practical ...
Read More
Considering the goals of forming the audit committee and its extensive duties, evaluating the performance of the audit committee in order to identify its strengths and weaknesses is very important. The present study presents a model for evaluating the performance of the audit committee and a practical model for the use of the activities of the audit committee by the beneficiaries. The model obtained in the current research includes 3 parts of evaluating the individual characteristics of the members of the audit committee, evaluating the work processes and reporting of the audit committee, and evaluating its duties and responsibilities, and the final model includes 3 dimensions, 13 components, and 78 indicators. The results of the research showed that the working and reporting processes of the audit committee have the most weight in evaluating the performance of the audit committee, and the evaluation of the audit committee meetings as the focus of the audit committee's activities is the most important among the performance evaluation components.ObjectiveThe optimal performance of the audit committee is an important variable in improving the processes and structure of corporate governance as well as financial reports. The duties of audit committees around the world are in sync with developments in the economic environment, and in Iran, according to the approved charter of the audit committee, the purpose of forming an audit committee in companies is to help fulfill the supervisory responsibility of the board of directors and to improve it in order to obtain assurance of reasonable quality of financial reporting, effectiveness of the internal audit process, ensuring the independence of the independent auditor and its effectiveness, adapting the company's activities to the laws, and ensuring the effectiveness of the activities of the corporate governance system, its committees, and other components. Considering the goals of forming the audit committee and its extensive duties, evaluating the performance of the audit committee in order to identify its strengths and weaknesses is very important. Due to the lack of comprehensive research in the country to provide a model to evaluate the performance of the audit committee, the present research has addressed this issue and a practical model for the use of the activities of the audit committee has been presented.MethodThe research method used in the first stage of the study involved extracting the dimensions, components, and performance evaluation indicators of the audit committee from the theoretical sources of the research. Then, the Fuzzy Delphi method was used to screen the indicators, and the Best-Worst Method (BWM) multi-criteria decision-making method was used to weigh each dimension, component, and index. Finally, to determine the gap between the existing situation in the field of audit committee performance evaluation and the model obtained in the current research, the Fuzzy Gap method has been used.FindingsBy studying the theoretical sources of the research, 96 indicators were determined to evaluate the performance of the audit committee, which were classified into 3 dimensions and 15 components using theoretical foundations. In the next step, to check the indicators, interviews were first conducted with 10 experts. In the interviews conducted regarding 6 indicators, revisions, and content adjustments were made to adapt to the current conditions of the country's economic environment. One index was also removed due to the lack of a legal structure for the index in Iran. In the next step, 95 finalized indicators were presented to the research experts for screening, and the responses given by the research experts were analyzed using the Fuzzy Delphi method. By calculating the fuzzy average of the numbers and then de-fuzzifying them, indicators with a de-fuzzified number less than 0.7 were removed, and 78 indicators were approved by the research experts. The model obtained in the current research includes three parts: evaluating the individual characteristics of the members of the audit committee, evaluating the work processes and reporting of the audit committee, and evaluating its duties and responsibilities. The final model includes 3 dimensions, 13 components, and 78 indicators.4- ConclusionAccording to the findings of the research, the important components in evaluating the performance of the audit committee are the audit committee meetings, the audit committee resources, communication with the board of directors, the audit committee charter, and monitoring of financial reporting. The results of the research showed that the working and reporting processes of the audit committee carry the most weight in the evaluation of the audit committee's performance, with a weight of about 66%, and the evaluation of the audit committee meetings as the focus of the audit committee's activities is the most important among the evaluation components. Also, proper communication with the board of directors, provision of sufficient resources for the activities of the audit committee, the existence of an approved charter of the audit committee, and monitoring of internal controls and financial reporting are important areas for evaluating the performance of the audit committee. The results of the research also indicated the existence of a significant gap between the current status of the audit committee's performance evaluation and the model obtained in the research. In this regard, it is suggested that the legislator (Securities and Exchange Organization) obliges the listed companies to evaluate the performance of the audit committee under their supervision. Furthermore, it is recommended to use the model presented in the current research, considering the importance of dimensions and components. Additionally, the board of directors of the companies can improve the performance of these committees by taking into account the important components of the audit committee's performance, by holding the audit committees under their supervision accountable in these areas, and also making a reasonable and logical assessment of their performance.Enhancing KnowledgeThis research has presented a practical model to evaluate the performance of the audit committee according to the characteristics of Iran's economic environment, which can serve as the basis for analyzing the performance of the audit committee based on its different functional dimensions.
Accounting report
Fatemeh Asnad; Hossein Fakhari
Abstract
Nowadays, the importance of water and the management of its resources are among the most controversial issues at the global level due to climate change. This issue is especially important in Iran, which suffers from continuous drought. Therefore, the current research aims to explain the determinants ...
Read More
Nowadays, the importance of water and the management of its resources are among the most controversial issues at the global level due to climate change. This issue is especially important in Iran, which suffers from continuous drought. Therefore, the current research aims to explain the determinants affecting water reporting in the listed companies on the Tehran Stock Exchange. For this purpose, by using the data of 102 companies during the years 2012 to 2021 which were selected by elimination method, the determinants affecting the disclosure of water reporting were identified and analyzed using stepwise regression and multiple regression methods. The results of this research showed that the highest amount of disclosure related to water belonged to chemical and oil industry companies, Additionally, in the investigation of the determinants affecting water reporting, it was found that the determinants affecting water reporting, it was found that the determinants of firm age, board size, financial expertise of the audit committee, concentration of ownership, institutional ownership, return on assets, average annual rainfall, reputation, regulation, and sensitivity of the industry to water had an impact on corporate water reporting. These findings can be useful for planning and controlling water management, as well as for investors to know the drivers of corporate disclosure in forming their optimal portfolio. IntroductionNowadays, the importance of water and the management of its resources are among the most controversial issues at the global level due to climate change. This issue is especially important in Iran, which suffers from continuous drought. Therefore, the current research aims to explain the determinants affecting water reporting in the listed companies on the Tehran Stock Exchange.Research Question(s): What are the determinants influencing the disclosure of water reporting in Tehran Stock Exchange member companies? What is the impact of these determinants on the disclosure of water reporting? Literature ReviewAlthough the limitation of water resources and its serious role in sustainable life and economic activities are not hidden from anyone, with increasing concerns about water and its pollution, and the effects of climate change, how to effectively manage water and report it at the corporate level has become more important. This attention has been such that today the disclosure of water management information and its risks has become part of the strategy and sustainability efforts of companies. Water reporting at the company level is a tool for transferring information about water risks, the effects of risk, and the company's water resources strategy.Multiple theoretical frameworks can be used to justify the necessity of water reporting at the company level and its determinants. These theories are in the same direction and complement each other, such that they are competing theories because all of them are trying to explain corporate water reporting. These theories include legitimacy theory, stakeholders theory, social responsibility theory, and resource-based theory. MethodologyThe population studied in this research comprises the companies that are members of the Tehran Stock Exchange over a period of 10 years from 2012 to 2021, and ultimately, 102 companies (1020 company-years) were selected using the systematic elimination method. The method used in this research to explain the determinants affecting the disclosure of water reporting included five steps: In the first step, the study of literature related to water reporting and the determinants affecting it was conducted. In the second step, a comprehensive review of the literature was carried out by referring to Springer, Wiley, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and ResearchGate databases. The preliminary search identified a number of articles that focused on broad areas of disclosure. The process of studying the abstracts and introductions of the articles led to the exclusion of some out-of-scope studies. After filtering the results, only eight of these articles related to water disclosure were selected. In the third step, a questionnaire was prepared and distributed among experts to confirm and complete the components. This step was used as a complementary method, according to the experts, to confirm and complete the determinants extracted from the literature, taking into account the local conditions of Iran. The fourth step involved finalizing the determinants after reviewing the questionnaires; finally, ten responses were received from the questionnaires sent to the experts, and the questionnaires were tested with the independent t-test method. The results showed that all the determinants included in the questionnaire, except for gender diversity, were approved by the board of directors and the audit committee. In the fifth step, the stepwise regression method was used to examine the effective variables and select the effective stimuli on water reporting, and then the multiple regression method was used to measure the impact of each of the approved stimuli. ResultsIn the stepwise regression method, the dependent variable (water reporting disclosure) and independent variables (firm size, firm age, financial leverage, audit committee size, audit committee financial expertise, independent members of the audit committee, board size, ownership concentration, institutional ownership, government ownership, return on assets, corporate social responsibility, average annual rainfall, GDP growth, reputation, and sensitivity of the industry to water) were selected and, over 10 stages, various regressions were formed and finally, ten independent variables were confirmed. The adjusted coefficient of determination of this regression is equal to 0.322, which has the highest coefficient of determination compared to other models, and the value of the significance level of the model is equal to 0.000, which shows the significance of the model. Finally, in response to the research question of what are the drivers of water reporting in companies, the following variables can be mentioned: firm age, audit committee financial expertise, board size, ownership concentration, institutional ownership, return on assets, average annual precipitation, reputation, regulation, and industry sensitivity to water. Subsequently, to check the impact of each of the factors, the variables selected in the previous step were entered into the regression and analyzed with the multiple regression method. Finally, the regression equation was obtained as follows:WaterDisclosure= -3.327 – 0.620 LnAge + 0.764 BoardSize + 1.450 Concentration + 0.895 ROA + 0.119 Co-financial + 3.191 Reputation – 0.001 Rainy – 0.977 Regulation+ 1.450 Institutional + 0.162 Sensetive DiscussionBy reviewing the literature, it was found that several determinants were effective in water reporting in companies; some of these determinants were related to the structural characteristics of the company, some to the characteristics and ownership structure, and finally to the financial performance of the company. Also, determinants such as the existence of foreign regulation and supervision, the company's attention from major shareholders, and reputation, as well as the level of social responsibility of companies, can lead to more disclosure of water-related information. In this research, in addition to these determinants, some other determinants such as the country's economic growth, annual rainfall, and audit committee characteristics were investigated by interviewing experts. ConclusionAccording to the findings of the research, companies with higher profitability and reputation also have higher disclosure. In addition, the findings suggested that considering there is still no codified and general regulation for water management applicable to all companies in Iran, it is recommended, according to the theory of stakeholders, that legislators and the environmental organization establish specific and enforceable regulations for companies to adhere to and disclose information related to water in their reports. Furthermore, since there is currently a requirement for listed companies to prepare sustainable reporting, providing information on water and how to manage water and its risks can be combined with other information on social activities and governance. This integration of reports will enable better monitoring for policy-makers and foster collaboration among stakeholders for responsible water management and achieving sustainable goals at both the corporate and global levels.
Audit Quality
Mahdi Saghafi; Azam Pouryousof; Ali Shirzadi
Abstract
In this research, the relationship between the discovery of audit distortions and the readability of financial reports has been investigated, as well as the moderating effect of management ability on this relationship. This research is practical in terms of its purpose, and the correlation method is ...
Read More
In this research, the relationship between the discovery of audit distortions and the readability of financial reports has been investigated, as well as the moderating effect of management ability on this relationship. This research is practical in terms of its purpose, and the correlation method is causal (post-event). In this research, the data of 129 companies listed on the Iran Stock Exchange during a seven-year period (from 2015 to 2021) were gathered to test the hypotheses using panel data. The collection of information in this study was done using library methods. Related data to measure the variables were collected from the Codal website and financial statements of the companies. Basic calculations were done in Excel. Then, Stata software was used to test the research hypotheses. The results of the research show that the discovery of audit distortions has a direct and significant effect on the readability of financial reports. Additionally, the results indicate that the ability of managers can not only moderate the positive relationship between the discovery of audit distortions and the readability of financial reports, but also increase the intensity of this relationship.IntroductionA significant part of the companies' information is presented through the annual reports. A clear presentation of this amount of information is important for the clear understanding and interpretation of the information in the financial statements. There is a possibility that company managers change the readability of financial reports in order to attract the attention of investors, and control the perceptions of information users. The possibility of managers exploiting loopholes in accepted accounting principles and standards for personal gain necessitates a thorough evaluation and review by auditors. This evaluation aims to identify potential opportunities for fraud and weaknesses in these principles and standards for rectification. In this way, auditors can play an important role in making financial reports more readable through the quality of the audit. At the same time, the motivation and ability of managers to apply personal interests can also be an obstacle to high-quality auditing. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to examine the effect of audit quality on the readability of financial reports and to investigate how managers' ability can influence this relationship.Research Question(s):Does audit quality have a significant effect on the readability of financial reports?Can managers' ability moderate the relationship between audit quality and readability of financial reports?Literature ReviewBlanco et al. (2021) stated in their research that when annual reports are less readable, auditors spend more effort on auditing financial statements. Furthermore, Hassan (2017) indicated that companies with capable managers publish more readable financial reports. Ghanizadeh et al. (2021) also concluded that financial knowledge and ability of managers have a positive and significant effect on audit quality.MethodologyThe data needed for the research were collected through Rahvard Navin software and Codal website, as well as from the audited financial statements of the companies and their audit reports. The statistical population of the research consists of the companies listed on the Iran Stock Exchange. Thus, 129 companies were selected from the statistical population over seven years (903 observations) from those active between 2015 and 2021, after applying restrictions.ResultsThe findings of the research show that the increase in sensitivity of the auditors in their proceedings, which has led to the discovery of more and more accounting distortions and finally the improvement of audit quality, has led to effective communication with managers in choosing simple words and phrases. This results in an increase in the use of simple language and a reduction in the complexity of financial report content, thereby enhancing the readability of financial reports. Additionally, the ability of managers can not only moderate the positive relationship between audit quality and the readability of financial reports, but also increase the intensity of this relationship.DiscussionThe readability of managers' explanatory reports is crucial for influencing information users. However, the absence of a universal standard for reading such reports presents management with numerous choices regarding content and even formatting. It is possible for managers to mislead the users of information when choosing the right decision by manipulating the readability of financial reports. This issue underscores the essential role of auditors, given its financial consequences and the potential for economic crises. Auditors play a crucial role in enhancing the quality of financial reports and mitigating opportunistic motives of managers. As the CEO is a key figure in the company's economy with significant influence, they can impact the company's value and profitability through their presentation of news and reports. Therefore, audit quality as one of the most important factors in the implementation of audit operations in audit institutions should be considered, so that the mission of auditing, which is ensuring financial statements, is carried out at the highest level of confidence. However, in situations where managers possess high abilities, there is a possibility of adjusting and being affected by this relationship. In this situation, there is a contradiction regarding the managers' ability to provide clear or complex reports and the quality of the audit. This issue originated from theories such as representation and stakeholders. Therefore, the moderating effect of managers' ability on the relationship between audit quality and readability of financial reports is important. In other words, capable managers in different situations send a positive sign of the company's status to the market by providing clear information and thus reduce agency costs. Thus, these managers have a greater ability to clearly express information to the market, which helps create a competitive advantage, maintain reputation, and foster self-motivation.ConclusionIn general, the results of this research indicate that the quality of auditing has improved, and the ability of managers plays a crucial role in enhancing the quality and transparency of financial reports. Therefore, it can be said that audit quality is an important and influential variable in ensuring financial statements and gaining the trust of information users. Additionally, capable managers demonstrate a greater inclination towards information transparency due to their superior performance.
Accounting report
Mohammad Soleymani; Mohammad Arabmazar Yazdi; MohammadHosien SafarZade; Javad Shekarkhah
Abstract
This study aims to investigate how a change in the accounting method of calculating bank loan loss provisions affects financial reporting quality of banks. In doing so, the current theoretical literature on the topic of the research has been described and the conflicting arguments in the previous research ...
Read More
This study aims to investigate how a change in the accounting method of calculating bank loan loss provisions affects financial reporting quality of banks. In doing so, the current theoretical literature on the topic of the research has been described and the conflicting arguments in the previous research have been expressed. Subsequently, using the transfer matrix method, loan loss reserves have been calculated for a sample of 17 banks, assuming that the method approved by international accounting standards (expected credit loss model) has been applied. Then, the research variables’ data, spanning from 2017 to 2021, was collected and analyzed under two assumptions: employing the current method and using the expected credit loss model. Then, the research hypothesis was tested using the least squares method. The results of the research show that the relationship between the change in the reporting system and discretionary accruals as an indicator of the financial reporting quality is negative and significant. Therefore, a change in the current accounting methods used for the calculation of loan loss reserves causes reduction in discretionary accruals and improvement of financial reporting quality. On the other hand, the results of this research show that large banks are more interested in using discretionary accruals and applying profit management than small banks, which can be caused by the "political costs theory". IntroductionThe quality of financial reports remains an important issue, garnering serious attention from regulators, professional accountants and other users of financial information. This is due to the irreplaceable role of financial reporting quality in reducing agency problems and information asymmetry (Anto & Yusran, 2023). In the banking system, the method used for calculating loan loss reserves is one of the most important factors affecting the quality of financial reporting. This is because the loan loss provision, typically the largest bank accrual, is highly correlated with banks' net income and represents the most prevalent accrual. Loan loss provisions are accruals of fundamental importance to bank performance, and they also reflect information asymmetry (Beatty & Liao, 2014).Despite the great importance of loan loss calculation method on banks’ financial reporting, few studies have examined the effectiveness of the current method used in Iranian banks. Additionally, research exploring the impact of changes in the loan loss calculation method on the quality of banks' financial reporting has been limited. Given this context, it becomes imperative to investigate the influence of this crucial variable on the quality of bank financial reporting. Conducting this research, particularly in Iran with its bank-oriented economy, can enhance the quality of financial reporting. This improvement would be achieved by selecting the optimal method for calculating loan loss reserves, thereby increasing the transparency of information in banks.Research Question(s)The main question of this research is as follows:Does the change in the bank loan loss reserves calculation method have a significant effect on the quality of banks financial reporting? Literature ReviewIn the current literature, two predominant views exist regarding the impact of changes in accounting methods on the quality of financial reporting. The first view posits that changing accounting methods, equated to adopting international accounting standards, enhances financial reporting quality. Conversely, the second view contends that there is either no relationship or a negative relationship between the adoption of new accounting methods and financial reporting quality. Mensah (2021) demonstrated a significant negative relationship between the use of new accounting methods and profit management, suggesting that methods endorsed by international accounting standards elevate the quality of companies’ financial reporting. This finding aligns with the conclusions of researchers like Nikhil et al. (2023), Ozili and Outa (2019), and Haapamakia (2018). On the contrary, Oppong & Bruce-Amartey (2022) examined the effects of new standards and corporate governance on accounting quality in Ghana, discovering that the implementation of new standards adversely impacts accounting quality. Similar conclusions were drawn by researchers like Suadiye (2017) and Campa & Donnelly (2016). MethodologyThis research employed a quantitative approach to examine the effect of changes in accounting methods on the quality of financial reporting. Initially, data was gathered using the current numbers of the financial statements of selected banks. Subsequently, the loan loss reserve calculation method was altered, and the research data was re-estimated using the new accounting method, aided by a transition matrix and the IFRS 9 formula. The research hypothesis was then tested using both datasets. The sample comprised data from 17 Iranian banks spanning the years 2017 to 2021. This data was collected using the Rahavard Novin database, the banks' financial statements, and analyzed using SPSS version 27 and EViews version 10 software, employing the least squares regression method. ResultsThe research findings reveal a significant negative relationship (at a significance level of 0.000) between the financial reporting system and discretionary accruals. This outcome suggests that a change in the method of calculating bank loan loss reserves, coupled with the adoption of a new method, leads to a decrease in discretionary accruals and in banks' earnings management practices. Additionally, the research indicates that the relationship between discretionary accruals and cash flow from operating activities, banks' profitability, and financial leverage is significantly negative. In contrast, the relationship between discretionary accruals and bank size is positive and significant. However, there appears to be no significant relationship between growth rate and asset turnover with discretionary accruals at the 5% significance level. DiscussionThe results of this research show that adopting the expected loss method, as opposed to the current method used in Iranian banks for calculating loan loss reserves, enhances the transparency of bank information and improves the quality of financial reporting. By reducing discretionary accruals, the new reporting system encourages banks to utilize fewer accruals, likely leading to a decrease in the use of profit management methods. Consequently, the adoption of IFRS in Iranian banks positively impacts the industry and its stakeholders. Furthermore, the research reveals that larger banks tend to employ discretionary accruals and engage in profit management more than smaller banks, a phenomenon potentially explained by the "political cost theory". ConclusionThe relationship between the quality of financial reporting and changes in bank loan loss reserves is positive and significant. Thus, the research hypothesis is confirmed, supporting the perspective of the first group (as discussed in the Literature Review section) in the context of Iranian banks. Based on these findings, it is recommended that the central bank mandate banks to disclose their reserves using the expected credit loss method as an initial step. Subsequently, banks whose reserves significantly deviate from the amounts calculated according to IFRS standards should be compelled to adjust their reserves over several years. This gradual approach aims to align the current reserves more closely with those calculated using the expected credit loss method.
Accounting report
Ahmad Mahdavi; Ali Zabihi; Abassali Pouraghajan
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to evaluate the challenging areas of accrual accounting implementation in the General Department of the Ministry of Economy and Finance of Mazandaran province. The methodology of this study is mixed. In the qualitative part, through systematic screening, the challenging ...
Read More
The purpose of this research is to evaluate the challenging areas of accrual accounting implementation in the General Department of the Ministry of Economy and Finance of Mazandaran province. The methodology of this study is mixed. In the qualitative part, through systematic screening, the challenging areas of accrual accounting implementation in the public sector are identified. Subsequently, these dimensions' reliability is assessed in two stages of Delphi analysis. Finally, in the quantitative part, through interpretive ranking analysis, the study seeks to evaluate the areas identified in the context of the General Department of the Ministry of Economy and Finance of Mazandaran province. The results of the study in the qualitative part indicated the existence of 9 challenging areas for the implementation of accrual accounting in the public sector, and during the process of fuzzy Delphi analysis, 8 criteria were confirmed as the reasons for the gap in the implementation of accrual accounting. Then, in the quantitative part, the study determined that the challenge of applying accounting standards of the public sector is a key factor in creating a gap in the implementation of accrual accounting in the General Department of the Ministry of Economy and Finance of Mazandaran province. The results also indicate that the public sector accounting standards, despite various amendments over the years, have tried to improve the implementation of accrual accounting in the public sector.IntroductionWith the emergence of accounting in the public sector, the nature and form of responsibility and accountability has changed so that organizations gradually moved towards transparency through accounting. These organizations were the guardians of public interests and had to consider themselves responsible for the needs of citizens. The dominant approach at the time of the formation of the role of accounting in the public sector was to focus on the cash basis. In doing so, public sector organizations tried to identify and disclose revenues and expenses identically and at the time of occurrence (Ismail, 2023). However, with the beginning of paradigm changes in the broad field of human sciences, this part of the accounting functions of the public sector has also changed, and many organizations have started moving towards the accrual basis in the disclosure of financial events from the mid-80s. In essence, accrual accounting has been considered the cornerstone of reforming financial information systems in public sectors. This shift was created in response to the acceptance of changes from traditional public management (PM) to modern public management (NPM), driven by the low efficiency of accountability and transparency systems. On the other hand, the emergence of legitimacy approaches, borrowed from business management to promote accountability in the public sector, has fueled the development of citizen rights management mechanisms in the last decade, transforming traditional public financial management (PFM) into modern public financial management (NPFM) (Dissanayake and Dellaportas, 2023). MethodologyIn terms of the results, this study is considered part of development research. This is because the issue of identifying the challenging areas of implementing accrual accounting in the public sector has been investigated in previous research as a main variable or complementary to other operational aspects of government accounting, such as budgeting, responsiveness, internal controls, and others. However, it has not been considered as a theoretical framework for explanation in the General Department of the Ministry of Economy and Finance of Mazandaran province. Conducting this study can help the development of theoretical and analytical literature in this field of study. The existence of this gap in the literature led us to present a model and evaluate the challenging areas of implementing accrual accounting in the public sector through the combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis processes. Therefore, in terms of the type of data, this study should be considered mixed, as the qualitative section identifies the challenging areas of accrual accounting implementation in the public sector through systematic screening, and Delphi analysis is used to confirm the reliability level of the identified dimensions. Then, based on the process of interpretative ranking analysis in the quantitative part, the study seeks to evaluate the challenging areas of accrual accounting implementation in the General Department of the Ministry of Economy and Finance of Mazandaran province. ResultIn this study, an effort was made to identify the most relevant dimensions that contribute to gaps in the implementation of accrual accounting in the public sector. This was achieved through systematic screening of research literature and a subsequent Delphi analysis for reliability assessment of these dimensions. Then, through interpretive ranking analysis, the study aimed to determine the most challenging areas in implementing accrual accounting in the General Department of the Ministry of Economy and Finance of Mazandaran Province. The specific analysis revealed that the challenge of applying public sector accounting standards is the most significant factor contributing to the gap in the implementation of accrual accounting in the General Department of the Ministry of Economy and Finance of Mazandaran Province. ConclusionIn interpreting these results, it should be noted that although the public sector accounting standards have undergone various amendments over the years to improve the implementation of accrual accounting, there remains a lack of coverage in aspects of compliance with Clause (d) of Article (28) of the Accession Law. Certain provisions in the law that regulates a part of the government's financial regulations (2), specifically those concerning spending credits and acquisition of capital assets, suggest that the absence of distinct headings in alignment with the program and budget organization could facilitate the reallocation of resources to different expenditure categories within organizations. This is an issue in the public sector for which a specific mechanism, as per Article (30) of the Program and Budget Law, has not been approved, thus impacting the ability to commit and accurately allocate credits and expenses for capital assets. Additionally, although Circular No. 210786/57, dated 11/7/2014, was issued to public sector organizations to address the obligations of excess reporting and credit allocation for saving realized costs, there exists an implementation gap in this directive. This gap affects the supervisory role in liability obligations, leading to an excess in credit allocation often recorded under other debt headings instead of being classified as reserves for realized expenses or capital obligations.
Accounting report
Farzad Eivani; Hadis Abdi; Farshid Kheirollahi; nasrin moridi
Abstract
Integrated financial reporting provides crucial information about an organization's strategy, direction, performance, and future outlook encompassing business, social, and environmental performance within its operational context. It also promotes a coherent and effective approach to corporate reporting. ...
Read More
Integrated financial reporting provides crucial information about an organization's strategy, direction, performance, and future outlook encompassing business, social, and environmental performance within its operational context. It also promotes a coherent and effective approach to corporate reporting. This research aims to compare the expectations of integrated financial reporting producers and users. Data analysis using SPSS software and statistical tests, including "Kolmogrove-smirnov", "Yoman-whitney" and "Friedman" has shown significant differences between the opinions of users and financial report preparers regarding report components, innovative practices, targeted investments, rewards and benefits, risk management, governance structure, and balanced scorecard. However, the comparison of expectations has shown no significant difference between the expectations of report providers and users regarding providing reports on mutual communication, compliance with legal and ethical standards, user’s engagement, and the reporting of financial status and sustainability of financial services.IntroductionAn integrated report should provide insight into the nature and quality of an organization's relationships with its key stakeholders. According to the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC), one of the guiding principles which underpin the preparation of integrated reports is the formation of effective stakeholder relationships. However, several challenges are also identified. These challenges include difficulties in determining what information is material and should, therefore, be included in an integrated report. This paper contributes to the ongoing debate on the quality and utility of integrated reporting by exploring the possibility that a perception gap has emerged, which affects the perceived relevance of integrated reporting. this paper makes an important contribution to the prior literature on integrated reporting by introducing the idea of a perception gap and offering one of the initial accounts of stakeholders’ perspectives on companies’ integrated reports. This will shed light on where companies can improve their integrated reports and inform the development of additional guidance by standard-setters and regulators.MethodologyThe study's statistical population comprises two groups: report producers and users. This includes auditors from the audit organizations and audit institutions, members of the Society of Official Accountants of Iran, as well as board directors and managers of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange during the year 2022. The sampling method employed in this research is available sampling. This research is classified as a descriptive-survey study with an applied approach. The identified themes are incorporated into a Likert scale questionnaire. Lastly, the collected data were analyzed using SPSS software and relevant statistical tests.FindingsBased on the findings, there is a gap between auditors' and users' perspectives in terms of reporting and identifying innovative perspectives, targeted investments, rewards and benefits, risk management, governance structure, and balanced scorecard. Conversely, no significant gap is anticipated between the perspectives of producers and users in terms of mutual communication, compliance with legal and ethical standards, streamlining financial operations, user communication, as well as reporting financial status and corporate sustainability.Conclusion and discussionIn line with the examination of expectations between providers and stakeholders concerning the disclosure of integrated reporting components, the results of hypothesis testing indicate that, except for reporting and identifying innovative perspectives, targeted investments, rewards and benefits, risk management, governance structure, and balanced evaluation card, there is no significant expectation gap between beneficiaries and providers. In fact, the results indicate that users of integrated reports seek additional information on matters such as the competence and performance of those responsible for governance and how management has handled risk to ensure financial sustainability and prevent financial crises. They prioritize these aspects over the disclosure of information about social and environmental issues.Finally, the results of this study highlight several areas for future research. It would be valuable to investigate whether a perception gap exists in other industries and to identify the factors contributing to changes in the perception gap. More work also needs to be done to understand the determinants of the perception gap. This paper is based on the assumption that user sophistication affects the perceived importance of disclosures found in integrated reports. Cultural variables, the nature of the corporate governance system and the extent to which companies are able to manage perceptions are additional variables which need to be taken into account in order to define the dimensions of the perception gap in an integrated reporting context more accurately and inform policymakers and standard setters.
Accounting report
Mohammad Javad Salimi; Ghassem blue; Maghsoud Amiri; Hamed Zakeri
Abstract
The earnings forecasts report is considered as one of the most important and effective reports in investors' decision-making. The purpose of this study is to present an earnings forecasts reporting framework in Iran's capital market. To achieve this research goal, the earnings forecasts reporting framework ...
Read More
The earnings forecasts report is considered as one of the most important and effective reports in investors' decision-making. The purpose of this study is to present an earnings forecasts reporting framework in Iran's capital market. To achieve this research goal, the earnings forecasts reporting framework was identified first by studying the theoretical foundations and the background of the research, as well as interviewing 21 experts using the snowball method and the theme analysis method. Then, through the implementation of the fuzzy Delphi method and solicitation of opinions from 183 experts using a questionnaire and targeted judgmental sampling method, a consensus was reached on the reporting framework, resulting in the presentation of the earnings forecasts reporting framework in Iran's capital market. The research population included university faculty members, employees in regulatory organizations, investors, auditors, and providers of financial information. The research results showed that out of 122 detailed themes extracted through theme analysis, categorized into six main themes and 14 sub-themes, 97 detailed themes obtained the consensus among the Delphi group, thereby forming components of the earnings forecasts reporting framework. The main elements of the earnings forecasts reporting framework encompass generalities, environmental fields, characteristics, consequences, challenges, and evaluation. The findings of this research can serve as a guide for developing financial reporting standards and modifying procedures and regulations.IntroductionThe management forecasts earnings is one of the disclosed information outside the financial statements, which reflects the management's forecast about the future prospects. This report is one of the most important sources of information for companies in the capital market. Corporate management possesses considerable information advantages about contingencies related to future profitability. Management disclosures are considered a valuable and potential source of information for investors. Investors are interested in estimating the future benefits of their investment so that they can assess receiving future cash earnings as well as the value of their shares. Therefore, the expected earnings from companies are important for investors and beneficiaries to make investment decisions.How to present the earnings forecast report has been a challenging issue in recent years. Therefore, in the current situation, examining the framework and reporting method of earnings forecasting in the Iranian capital market using the opinions of experts is regarded as an essential need.Considering the importance of earnings forecast reporting for investors, the problem of the current research is: What is the earnings forecast reporting framework in Iran's capital market? Additionally, what are the components of this framework based on the country's economic and capital market conditions? Literature ReviewThere are several reasons for disclosing the information of managers and publishing the earnings forecast report. One reason for this is agency theory, which refers to the conflict of interests between managers and owners. In addition, we can refer to the Signaling theory, Expectation adjustment hypothesis, and Legal liability hypothesis.The primary framework of earnings forecasting reporting includes the purpose, users, limitations, environmental fields, characteristics, and consequences.Hirst et al. (2008) provided a framework regarding management earnings forecasting. They categorized earnings forecasts into three components including antecedents, characteristics, and consequences. They concluded that earnings forecasting characteristics are less explored in both theoretical and empirical research, despite managers having the most control over this component.Preussner and Aschauer (2022) synthesized the literature on management earnings forecasts and adaption mechanisms, combined existing theories into a unifying framework. Overall, the literature review provides strong support for a positive correlation between the extent and credibility of management earnings forecasts, on the one hand, and stock returns, share liquidity, and analyst coverage, on the other hand. Earnings forecasts tend to be optimistically biased, with a positive correlation with forecast uncertainty, earnings flexibility, financial distress, investor sentiment, and the share price dependency of managers' remuneration. Firm growth, legal liability, and litigation risk are significantly associated with forecast pessimism.Until 2017, listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange published an independent report titled earnings forecasts report. The Securities and Exchange Organization announced in a notification that since January 2018, the Issuers are not allowed to publish earnings forecasts report. Instead, they are required to prepare and disclose the management's interpretive report alongside the interim and annual financial statements. Recently, as of July 2021, the return of the earnings forecast report was announced with a new procedure for five industries.MethodologyTo achieve the goal of the research, the primary framework was first identified by studying the literature review and theoretical background. Semi-structured interviews were then conducted with 21 experts using the snowball sampling method. The data from the interview was analyzed using the theme analysis method and the earnings forecasts reporting framework was extracted according to the country's environmental characteristics. Finally, the fuzzy Delphi method was implemented and opinions were gathered from 183 experts through a questionnaire and targeted judgment sampling method to reach a consensus on the earnings forecasts reporting framework.The statistical population of the research included university faculty members, employees in regulatory organizations, investors, auditors, and providers of financial information.ResultsThe research results showed that out of 122 detailed themes extracted through theme analysis, which were categorized into 6 main themes and 14 sub-themes, 97 detailed themes obtained consensus from the Delphi group and were identified as components of the earnings forecasts reporting framework. The main themes of the framework are generalities, environmental fields, characteristics, consequences, challenges, and evaluation. Each main theme consists of sub-themes. For example, the generalities theme includes sub-themes such as purpose, users, and limitations. The environmental fields theme covers aspects related to the forecast environment and company characteristics. The characteristics theme encompasses the method of publishing, features, text of the report, and assurance. The consequences theme addresses the consequences of publishing and non-publishing. The challenges theme explores the challenges in the environment and the company. Lastly, the evaluation theme focuses on the evaluation of the disclosure procedure.DiscussionThe findings of this research can serve as a valuable guide for developing financial reporting standards and modifying procedures and regulations.The paper has some limitations. The use of questionnaires, which is common in humanities research, is inherently limited, and this research is no exception. The time limitation, the diverse knowledge base of the experts, and their interest in the research topic may have influenced the quality of the experts' responses to the questionnaire.ConclusionThis research has presented the earnings forecasts reporting framework in Iran's capital market, consisting of 6 main themes. The results of this study can help Iran's Accounting Standards Development Committee in developing standards. Furthermore, the Securities and Exchange Organization can use the framework, particularly for the evaluation theme to modify and present regulations related to earnings forecasting reporting. Additionally, investors can use the results of this research to enhance their understanding about the earnings forecast report and make more informed investment decisions. Issuers can also use the framework to improve information disclosure and prepare reports.AcknowledgmentsI am grateful to all the esteemed professors and experts who helped me in this way. I would also like to express my gratitude to the staff of Allameh Tabataba’i University for their cooperation.
Accounting report
Mozaffar Jamalianpour
Abstract
The importance and role of Media and NEWS are increased by improvement of Information and Communication Technologies. This article try to find role of medias’ news in corporate earning management strategies. So, I investigate for show impact of media coverage on replacement and trade off between ...
Read More
The importance and role of Media and NEWS are increased by improvement of Information and Communication Technologies. This article try to find role of medias’ news in corporate earning management strategies. So, I investigate for show impact of media coverage on replacement and trade off between Accrual Earning Management (AEM) and Real Earning Management (REM) (Earning Management Strategy). For this purpose, I collect NEWS about listed companies during 2015 until 2020 and used Heckman's Two-Step for measure replacement between AEM and REM. I used Different in different and Feasible Generalized Least Squares (FGLS) methods for hypothesis testing.Results show that earning management strategies are different in reaction of media coverage. Increase of media coverage cause companies decrease AEM but they use REM more than usual in this position. In additional, research findings show that companies with higher media coverage and suspect to earning management try to more change in board of directors. So, results show that media has controlling and pressure effect on companies for earning management’s strategy.
Accounting report
Masoumeh Shahsavari; Mohammad Reza Abbaszadeh; Hamze hesari
Abstract
In the present study, the relationship between the qualitative information of the auditor's report and the quality of accounting has been discussed. In particular, the relationship between the tone of the auditor's report and the audit fee (audit quality criterion based on the input of the audit process) ...
Read More
In the present study, the relationship between the qualitative information of the auditor's report and the quality of accounting has been discussed. In particular, the relationship between the tone of the auditor's report and the audit fee (audit quality criterion based on the input of the audit process) has been examined with respect to the concepts of risk, client business risk, and litigation risk. To test the research hypotheses, 360-year-firms data of Iranian Stock Exchange were used during a period of 6-years, three years before and three years after the revision of Auditing Standard No. 700. Textual data were analyzed using Maxqda10 text analysis software and after quantification along with other quantitative data were analyzed using multivariate linear regression in Ives software and SPSS Eviews 9. The results indicate a weak inverse relationship between the optimistic tone and the audit fee variable. In addition, the findings showed that the acceptance of the requirements of Auditing Standard No. 700 does not make significant changes in the relationship between the tone of the auditor's report and the remuneration compared to the period before the review. In general, the results of the research indicate evidence of the predominance of the signaling effect (albeit poorly) in the sample.
Accounting report
iman zare
Abstract
Improving the quality of financial reporting is one of the effective factors to approach an efficient capital market and optimal capital allocation, the present research tries to explain the quality of financial reporting from the perspective of adjusted structuration theory. The adjusted structuration ...
Read More
Improving the quality of financial reporting is one of the effective factors to approach an efficient capital market and optimal capital allocation, the present research tries to explain the quality of financial reporting from the perspective of adjusted structuration theory. The adjusted structuration theory explains social systems, including accounting, with an ethical approach and considering the dual relationship between agency and structure.The current research is quantitative in terms of implementation method. In the quantitative part, the correlation method based on confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling was used. The statistical population of the research includes university faculty members and financial managers 154 people were selected by available sampling method. The research tool is an extractive questionnaire from research literature. The analysis of data in the quantitative part in the form of structural equation model showed that the relationship between agency and accounting structure with the quality of financial reporting is strongly significant and agency has a higher rating in this relationship, this relationship is due to the influence of an opinion based on ethics with the first rank, decision-making with the second rank and accountability with the third rank will be from the direction of agency and structure on the quality of financial reporting. the accounting system with emphasis on adjusted structuration Theory increases the quality of financial reporting by providing a comprehensive theoretical framework based on the usefulness and ethics of the accounting system as well as the usefulness of information for decision making.
Accounting report
Ali Saqafi; Ghasem Blue; HosseinAli Sohrabi Varzaneh
Abstract
Development of Earnings quality measures, especially Accruals quality measures, has been a critical line of research over more than three decades. Literature indicates that linear-regression-based measures are subject to (suffer from) significant estimation error in non-discretionary accruals estimation. ...
Read More
Development of Earnings quality measures, especially Accruals quality measures, has been a critical line of research over more than three decades. Literature indicates that linear-regression-based measures are subject to (suffer from) significant estimation error in non-discretionary accruals estimation. Therefore, recent research used machine learning algorithms including multilayer perceptron and radial basis neural networks, in order to address the issue. However, being founded on Blackbox approach limits future development and applicability of these methods. So, to address the limitations, we have used Group Method of Handling Data (GMDH) approach, as a Whitebox approach, in order to estimate the accruals. Findings using data from 299 Tehran Securities Exchange listed companies during 1385 to 1397 suggests that GMDH-based models perform superior to regression models and multilayer perceptron neural networks in terms of estimation error measured by mean squared error. Moreover, Cash flow approach in total accruals calculation leads to less estimation error compared to balance sheet approach. As a result, the model developed in this article can be used by market participants such as regulators, analyst and auditors in order to detect probable financial reporting misstatements.
Accounting report
Ali Rahmani; Azam Valizadeh Larijani; Elham Rabihavi
Abstract
The need for a set of qualified accounting standards has led to the development of international financial reporting standards. like many other countries globally, Iran has adopted these standards and required their application in a group of capital market companies. The main purpose of this study is ...
Read More
The need for a set of qualified accounting standards has led to the development of international financial reporting standards. like many other countries globally, Iran has adopted these standards and required their application in a group of capital market companies. The main purpose of this study is to examine the challenges and benefits of implementing International Financial Reporting Standards from the perspective of the executives who are required to use the standards. The statistical population of this study, consisting of managers of banks, insurance companies and, stock exchange companies, are required to comply with IFRS according to the enactment of the Stock Exchange and Securities Organization, which includes a total of 77 companies. The collection tool of this research is a questionnaire that was distributed from September to October 2016. The answers to 59 questionnaires were received from 77 distributed questionnaires. For banks, the biggest challenge was the cost of training at the level of companies and users of financial information, for insurers it was the difference between tax laws and international financial reporting standards, and for other companies, the lack of accountants and auditors that have the technical skills of implementing international financial reporting standards.
Accounting report
Elnaz Akbarlou; Mehdi zeynali; Mehdi alinezhad sarokolaei; Rasoul baradaran hassan zadeh
Abstract
Narcissist managers, with behavioral characteristics such as selfishness, domination, and self-aggrandizement, don’t consider rules and regulations important. They manipulate detailed accounting reports opportunistically using positive words in an optimistic manner. This study aims to investigate ...
Read More
Narcissist managers, with behavioral characteristics such as selfishness, domination, and self-aggrandizement, don’t consider rules and regulations important. They manipulate detailed accounting reports opportunistically using positive words in an optimistic manner. This study aims to investigate the relationship between managers' narcissism and the optimistic tone of financial reporting with the moderating role of earnings management. To measure narcissism, two proxies are used: the area of managers’ signatures and the ratio of managers' remuneration to the total annual salary of employees, and vocabulary frequency as a criterion to measure optimistic tone. The sample includes 115 companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange throughout 2011- 2018. To test the research hypotheses, regression has been used. Results indicate that there is a positive and meaningful correlation between the narcissism of managers and the optimistic tone in financial reporting. In other words, narcissist managers consider financial reports prepared based on an optimistic tone as an opportunity to satisfy their insatiable desire for self-promotion. Earnings management has got a positive moderating effect on the correlation of narcissism of managers and optimistic tone in financial reporting.
Accounting report
maryam yokhanehalghyani; jamal bahrisales; Saeid Jabbarzadeh Kangarluei; Akbar Zavari Rezaei
Abstract
Companies sometimes file fraudulent financial statements for tax fraud. The purpose of this study is to combine data mining tools and artificial intelligence with meta-heuristic algorithms to explain and optimize a model for detecting fraud and tax evasion by using the capacity of financial reporting. ...
Read More
Companies sometimes file fraudulent financial statements for tax fraud. The purpose of this study is to combine data mining tools and artificial intelligence with meta-heuristic algorithms to explain and optimize a model for detecting fraud and tax evasion by using the capacity of financial reporting. Qualitative and quantitative indicators of financial reports of 1056 year- companies in the Tehran Stock Exchange in the period of 2006 to 2019 were studied in the classical approach and used to expand the model in the Adaptive Neural-Fuzzy Inference System. Findings show that in optimization with genetic algorithm, particle swarm optimization algorithm and differential evolution algorithm, the most efficient model is obtained by particle swarm algorithm, which is the most efficient algorithm in the study with experimental and educational data. The results indicate that the application of different optimization algorithms in the data mining approach increases the predictive power of the fraudulent financial-tax reporting identification model
