Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. in Accounting, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’iUniversity, Tehran, Iran

4 Professor of Governmental management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Considering the goals of forming the audit committee and its extensive duties, evaluating the performance of the audit committee in order to identify its strengths and weaknesses is very important. The present study presents a model for evaluating the performance of the audit committee and a practical model for the use of the activities of the audit committee by the beneficiaries. The model obtained in the current research includes 3 parts of evaluating the individual characteristics of the members of the audit committee, evaluating the work processes and reporting of the audit committee, and evaluating its duties and responsibilities, and the final model includes 3 dimensions, 13 components, and 78 indicators. The results of the research showed that the working and reporting processes of the audit committee have the most weight in evaluating the performance of the audit committee, and the evaluation of the audit committee meetings as the focus of the audit committee's activities is the most important among the performance evaluation components.

Objective

The optimal performance of the audit committee is an important variable in improving the processes and structure of corporate governance as well as financial reports. The duties of audit committees around the world are in sync with developments in the economic environment, and in Iran, according to the approved charter of the audit committee, the purpose of forming an audit committee in companies is to help fulfill the supervisory responsibility of the board of directors and to improve it in order to obtain assurance of reasonable quality of financial reporting, effectiveness of the internal audit process, ensuring the independence of the independent auditor and its effectiveness, adapting the company's activities to the laws, and ensuring the effectiveness of the activities of the corporate governance system, its committees, and other components. Considering the goals of forming the audit committee and its extensive duties, evaluating the performance of the audit committee in order to identify its strengths and weaknesses is very important. Due to the lack of comprehensive research in the country to provide a model to evaluate the performance of the audit committee, the present research has addressed this issue and a practical model for the use of the activities of the audit committee has been presented.

Method

The research method used in the first stage of the study involved extracting the dimensions, components, and performance evaluation indicators of the audit committee from the theoretical sources of the research. Then, the Fuzzy Delphi method was used to screen the indicators, and the Best-Worst Method (BWM) multi-criteria decision-making method was used to weigh each dimension, component, and index. Finally, to determine the gap between the existing situation in the field of audit committee performance evaluation and the model obtained in the current research, the Fuzzy Gap method has been used.

Findings

By studying the theoretical sources of the research, 96 indicators were determined to evaluate the performance of the audit committee, which were classified into 3 dimensions and 15 components using theoretical foundations. In the next step, to check the indicators, interviews were first conducted with 10 experts. In the interviews conducted regarding 6 indicators, revisions, and content adjustments were made to adapt to the current conditions of the country's economic environment. One index was also removed due to the lack of a legal structure for the index in Iran. In the next step, 95 finalized indicators were presented to the research experts for screening, and the responses given by the research experts were analyzed using the Fuzzy Delphi method. By calculating the fuzzy average of the numbers and then de-fuzzifying them, indicators with a de-fuzzified number less than 0.7 were removed, and 78 indicators were approved by the research experts. The model obtained in the current research includes three parts: evaluating the individual characteristics of the members of the audit committee, evaluating the work processes and reporting of the audit committee, and evaluating its duties and responsibilities. The final model includes 3 dimensions, 13 components, and 78 indicators.
­4- Conclusion
According to the findings of the research, the important components in evaluating the performance of the audit committee are the audit committee meetings, the audit committee resources, communication with the board of directors, the audit committee charter, and monitoring of financial reporting. The results of the research showed that the working and reporting processes of the audit committee carry the most weight in the evaluation of the audit committee's performance, with a weight of about 66%, and the evaluation of the audit committee meetings as the focus of the audit committee's activities is the most important among the evaluation components. Also, proper communication with the board of directors, provision of sufficient resources for the activities of the audit committee, the existence of an approved charter of the audit committee, and monitoring of internal controls and financial reporting are important areas for evaluating the performance of the audit committee. The results of the research also indicated the existence of a significant gap between the current status of the audit committee's performance evaluation and the model obtained in the research. In this regard, it is suggested that the legislator (Securities and Exchange Organization) obliges the listed companies to evaluate the performance of the audit committee under their supervision. Furthermore, it is recommended to use the model presented in the current research, considering the importance of dimensions and components. Additionally, the board of directors of the companies can improve the performance of these committees by taking into account the important components of the audit committee's performance, by holding the audit committees under their supervision accountable in these areas, and also making a reasonable and logical assessment of their performance.
Enhancing Knowledge
This research has presented a practical model to evaluate the performance of the audit committee according to the characteristics of Iran's economic environment, which can serve as the basis for analyzing the performance of the audit committee based on its different functional dimensions.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Alhababsah, S., & Yekini, S. (2021). Audit committee and audit quality: An empirical analysis considering industry expertise, legal expertise and gender diversity. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation42, 100377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2021.100377
  2. Baatwah, S.R., Salleh, Z., & Stewart, J. (2019). Audit committee chair accounting expertise and audit report timeliness: The moderating effect of chair characteristics. Asian Review of Accounting, 27(2), 273-306. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-12-2017-0190
  3. Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Neal, T. L. (2009). The audit committee oversight process. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(1), 65-122. https://doi.org/10.1506/car.26.1.3
  4. Bedard, J. & Genron, Y. (2010). Strengthening the Financial Reporting System: Can Audit Committees Deliver?. International Journal of Auditing, 14, 174-210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2009.00413.x
  5. Bojadziev, G., & Bojadziev, M. (2007). Fuzzy logic for business, finance, and management (Vol. 23). World Scientific.
  6. Buallay, A. M., & AlDhaen, E. S. (2018). The relationship between audit committee characteristics and the level of sustainability report disclosure. In Challenges and Opportunities in the Digital Era: 17th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services, and e-Society, I3E 2018, Kuwait City, Kuwait, October 30–November 1, 2018, Proceedings 17 (pp. 492-503). Springer International Publishing.
  7. DeZoort, F. T. (1998). An analysis of experience effects on audit committee members' oversight judgments. Accounting, Organizations and Society23(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00029-9
  8. DeZoort, F.T., Hermanson, D.R., Archambeault, D.S., & Reed, S.A. (2002). Audit Committee Effectiveness: A Synthesis of the Empirical Audit Committee Literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 21, 38-75.
  9. Ghafran, C., & O'Sullivan, N. (2017). The impact of audit committee expertise on audit quality: Evidence from UK audit fees. The British Accounting Review49(6), 578-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.09.008
  10. Gorshunov, M. A., Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., & Walker, H. J. (2021). Quad-qualified audit committee director: Implications for monitoring and reducing financial corruption. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101854
  11. Hambrick, D., Misangyi, V., & Park, C. (2015). The Quad Model for Identifying a Corporate Director's Potential for Effective Monitoring: Toward a New Theory of Board Sufficiency. Academy of Management Review, 40, 323-344. 10.5465/amr.2014.0066. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0066
  12. Liao, C. H., & Hsu, A.W.H. (2013). Common membership and effective corporate governance: Evidence from audit and compensation committees. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(1), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12000
  13. Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega53, 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009
  14. Smith, R. (2003). Audit Committees Combined Code Guidance: A Report and Proposed Guidance by an FRC Appointed Group, Financial Reporting Council: London,
  15. Spira, L. F. (1998). An Evolutionary Perspective on Audit Committee Effectiveness, Corporate Governance, 6(1), 29-38.
  16. Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate governance: an international review, 17(3), 320-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00742.x
  17. Abdi, M., Zalaghi, H., Kazemi Olum, M., & Alibiglo, M. (2020). Audit Committee Characteristics and the Free Cash Flow: Testing the Agency and the Transactions Cost Theories. Empirical studies in financial accounting, 17(68), 121-143. [In Persian]
  18. Abtahi, B. (2004). Audit Committee Effectiveness Model [Master's thesis, University of Tehran], University of Tehran, Iran, 137-199. [In Persian]
  19. Alavi, S., Ghaemi, M., & Rezazadeh, J. (2017). Investigating the impact of audit committee activities on financial reporting. Applied research in financial reporting Journal, 6, 35-66. [In Persian]
  20. Alavi Tabari, S., & Asabakhsh, R. (2010). The role of the audit committee and the investigation of obstacles to its creation and use in Iran. Accounting Advances Journal, 2, 155-177. [In Persian]
  21. Alihosseini, M., Beshkooh, M., & Kordestani, Gh. (2022). Providing A Model for Improving the Efficiency and Effectiveness of the Audit Committee with A Grounded Theory Approach. Emprical researches in accounting, 12(3), 301-320. [In Persian]
  22. Babajani, J., Bulu, Gh., Ghorbanizadeh, V., Javadipour, A. (2022). Developing Framework for Evaluating the Performance of the Audit Committee Using the Meta-combination Method. Financial Accounting and Auditing Researches, 14(56), 1-49. [In Persian]
  23. Ghaemi, F., Moradi, Z., & Alavi, Gh. (2020). The effect of audit committee characteristics on internal controls and earnings management. Financial accounting and auditing researches, 46, 259-280. [In Persian]
  24. Hajiha, Z., & Azadzadeh, A. (2019). The characteristics of the audit committee and the comparability of financial statements with an emphasis on the size of the audit firm and corporate governance. Knowledge of financial accounting journal, 6(3), 95-117. [In Persian]
  25. Hassah Yeganeh, Y., Seddighi, R., & Hassanzadeh, F. (2016). The relationship between independent audit quality and audit committee with profit management and cash flow management. Knowledge of management accounting and auditing journal, 22, 13-24. [In Persian]
  26. Heydarinejad, G., Jamshidi Navid, B., & Ghanbari, M. (2020). Identifying factors affecting the quality of the audit committee. Audit knowledge Journal, 20(79), 316-344. [In Persian]
  27. Hoseyni, R., Ganji, H., Eskandari, Gh., & Soltanpour, H. (2021). The Effects of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) and Audit Committee Characteristics on the Firms’ Reputation. Empirical researches in accounting, 11(2), 99-136. [In Persian]
  28. Maroufkhani, M., Nourifard, Y., & Sarraf, F. (2022). A model for evaluating performance of audit committee in Iran stock market. Knowledge of audit and management accounting, 11(42), 215-232. [In Persian]
  29. Mohammadi, R., Darabi, R., & Sarraf, F. (2020). Investigating effective factors in the efficiency of audit committees using the metasynthesis method. Knowledge of Accounting and Management Audit Journal, 9(34), 107-126. [In Persian]
  30. Securities and Exchange Organization [SEC]. (2012). Audit Committee Charter, Tehran, Iran, 1-6. [In Persian]
  31. Tariverdi, Y., & Ghaderi, S. (2017). The Role of Audit Committee Financial Expertise on the Managerial Short-Termism. Empirical studies in financial accounting, 14(54), 141-165. [In Persian]
  32. Zareii, A., & Ghasemi, M. (2016). The effect of audit committee characteristics on the quality of financial reporting. Accounting reviews Journal, 12, 43-64. [In Persian]
  33. Zolghi, H., Norouzi, M., Asadi, Gh. & Kazazi, M. (2019). Audit committee characteristics, cost of debt and investment efficiency. Financial Accounting Research Journal. 11(1), 101-116. [In Persian]