stock exchange
Zahra Heidary Sureshjani; Darioush Foroughi; Alireza Rohravi Dastjardi
Abstract
Assets are crucial for companies' current and future decisions, significantly influencing investors' perceptions. This study investigates the relationship between accounting asset informativeness and investors' beliefs, with a focus on the impact of accounting earnings quality. A sample of 249 companies ...
Read More
Assets are crucial for companies' current and future decisions, significantly influencing investors' perceptions. This study investigates the relationship between accounting asset informativeness and investors' beliefs, with a focus on the impact of accounting earnings quality. A sample of 249 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange between 2013 and 2023 was selected for analysis. The results indicate that increased asset informativeness positively influences investors' beliefs at both the aggregate and discretionary levels. However, asset informativeness related to inherent factors does not impact investors' beliefs. Furthermore, low earnings quality does not weaken the relationship between asset informativeness at the aggregate level and discretionary factors with investors' beliefs.IntroductionInvestors' beliefs and expectations play a crucial role in their decision-making process and behavior. Assets are a key factor in a company's present and future decisions, significantly influencing investors' confidence. Accounting assets help reduce uncertainty about a share's true value and shape people's expectations of the company. In other words, they contain valuable information, reflecting high accounting asset informativeness. Notably, accounting asset informativeness is distinct from earnings indicators. As a result, low earnings quality does not affect investors' beliefs due to the presence of accounting asset informativeness. Therefore, earnings quality may not influence the correlation between accounting asset informativeness and investors' beliefs. Based on this, the research aims to explore the connection between accounting asset informativeness and investors' beliefs, with a focus on the influence of accounting earnings quality. The researchers propose two hypotheses: Accounting asset informativeness positively impacts investors' beliefs, and earnings quality does not moderate the influence of accounting asset informativeness on investors' beliefs.MethodologyThis study focuses on applied research. Accounting asset informativeness is the independent variable, calculated using the explanatory power of the regression of a company's net operating assets on its operating earnings. A 10-year rolling regression was conducted separately for each company. Investors' beliefs were the dependent variable, and the earnings quality served as the moderating variable. Earnings quality was determined based on four criteria: earnings stability, earnings smoothing, accruals quality, and the relationship between earnings and value. The study included a sample of 249 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, spanning from 2013 to 2023.ResultsThe information provided by accounting assets has a positive impact on investors' beliefs at both the aggregate and discretionary levels. However, this information does not affect investors' beliefs when it comes to intrinsic factors. Additionally, low earnings quality does not weaken the relationship between accounting asset information at the aggregate level and discretionary factors with investors' beliefs.DiscussionAccording to neoclassical investment theory, changes in a company's market value reflect investors' assessments of its intrinsic value based on available information. Therefore, the informativeness of a company's accounting assets can affect its stock performance. When a company's capital stock is inaccurately measured by its accounting assets, changes in market value will have a greater impact than changes in accounting assets. On the other hand, when accounting assets are measured with less error, they provide more accurate information about the company's resources. Investors use this information to estimate the market value of a company's stock and form expectations about its intrinsic value. If accounting asset informativeness is strong, investors rely on asset information to analyze the intrinsic value of the stock. It seems that even if the quality of earnings is weak, it does not significantly impact investors' decision-making. Therefore, low earnings quality cannot disrupt the relationship between accounting asset informativeness and shareholders' expectations.ConclusionBased on the findings, investors and financial statement users should consider asset informativeness when determining the true value of a share. It is important to note that financial statement information is not limited to profit and loss but also includes the measurement of assets on the balance sheet.Creditors should not focus solely on profit and loss in their debt agreement; they should also consider the company's assets as a result of its current and future decisions. It is recommended that standard setters use asset informativeness to evaluate the effects of policy changes and balance sheet asset measurement changes to improve the implementation of accounting standards.Analysts should consider asset informativeness as a fundamental factor during analysis, especially when earnings quality is low. Additionally, company managers and planners should specify the purpose of obtaining operational assets and the capacity of those assets during financial reporting to attract the attention of investors and creditors.
Accounting and various aspects of finance
Gharibe Esmailikia; Mahdis Naseri; Amin Ghanbari
Abstract
In today’s world, a company’s profile is not determined solely by financial issues; rather, there is a growing need to include environmental and social perspectives. Consequently, there has been a rapidly increasing awareness of social and environmental activities, which in recent years has ...
Read More
In today’s world, a company’s profile is not determined solely by financial issues; rather, there is a growing need to include environmental and social perspectives. Consequently, there has been a rapidly increasing awareness of social and environmental activities, which in recent years has been considered under the concept of sustainability performance. According to the contingency theory, the implementation of a sustainability approach can vary significantly depending on an organization’s unique conditions. This theory has had significant implications for management decision-making, as management decisions are influenced by the characteristics of the managers themselves. The purpose of this research is to investigate the moderating role of managers' behavioral dimensions on the relationship between contingent factors and non-financial sustainability performance. Nine research hypotheses were tested and analyzed using the information of 142 firms admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange during the period from 2013 to 2022 (including 1,420 firm-year observations) and using regression. The results indicated a positive and significant effect of firm size on non-financial sustainability performance and a negative and significant effect of environmental complexity and uncertainty on non-financial sustainability performance. No significant relationship was documented between board independence and non-financial sustainability performance. Management optimism strengthens the relationship between firm size and non-financial sustainability performance. In addition, management myopia changes and negates the relationship between board independence and non-financial sustainability performance. However, management optimism does not have a moderating role in the relationship between environmental complexity and uncertainty and the independence of the board of directors with non-financial sustainability performance. Finally, management myopia does not moderate the relationship between firm size, environmental complexity, and uncertainty with non-financial sustainability performance. IntroductionThe business environment for companies is increasingly uncertain and unstable due to many factors, not only financial but also non-financial. The application of contingency theory to sustainability reveals several factors that may influence performance and shape sustainability-oriented practices. In the field of corporate sustainability, this theory guides companies to prioritize sustainability as a dynamic capability to identify new opportunities and threats, leverage relevant opportunities, and adapt to market dynamics. Organizational strategic outcomes and processes are influenced by the managerial characteristics of senior managers. In particular, strategic choices are driven more by behavioral factors than by mechanical optimization. This theory emphasizes that the different characteristics of senior managers affect their strategic and structural decisions, which directly impact organizational performance. Based on this, the aim of the current research is to investigate the moderating role of managers' behavioral dimensions on the relationship between contingent factors and non-financial sustainability performance.MethodologyAccording to its nature, this research is classified as applied, descriptive, and based on regression analysis. The necessary information for the research variables and hypothesis testing was gathered by referring to audited financial statements, independent audit reports, and financial database software such as Rahvard Navin and Tadbir Pardaz. The research data was then compiled in Excel, and used for statistical analysis with EViews software.In this research, the statistical population includes all the companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Considering the conditions, a total of 142 companies (equivalent to 1,420 company-years) were selected, and their data was compiled using Excel software, then summarized, classified, and refined. Based on the objectives of the research, nine hypotheses were formulated as follows:First hypothesis: Firm size has a relationship with the company's non-financial sustainability performance.Second hypothesis: Environmental complexity and uncertainty are related to the company's non-financial sustainability performance.Third hypothesis: Board independence is related to the company's non-financial sustainability performance.Fourth hypothesis: Management optimism moderates the relationship between firm size and non-financial sustainability performanceFifth hypothesis: Management optimism moderates the relationship between environmental complexity and uncertainty with non-financial sustainability performance.Sixth hypothesis: Management optimism moderates the relationship between board independence and non-financial sustainability performance.Seventh hypothesis: Management myopia moderates the relationship between firm size and non-financial sustainability performance.Eighth hypothesis: Management myopia moderates the relationship between environmental complexity and uncertainty and non-financial sustainability performance.Ninth hypothesis: Management myopia moderates the relationship between board independence and non-financial sustainability performance. To test the above hypotheses, the following regression models are used:+(1) +(2)+(3)ConclusionThe increasing pressure to meet sustainability requirements has encouraged companies to implement sustainability programs to monitor and evaluate their processes and the impact of their activities along the value chain. It appears that not only is there a difference of opinion about the definition of corporate sustainability, but there is also ambiguity regarding the implementation of corporate sustainability practices. As a result, a significant diversity in organizations and various approaches to corporate sustainability can be identified. In this context, to enhance the understanding of the implementation of sustainable practices, it is suggested to adopt contingency theory. The aim of the current research is to investigate the role of managers' behavioral dimensions on the relationship between contingent factors and non-financial sustainability performance.The results of the first hypothesis test showed that firm size has a positive and significant effect on non-financial sustainability performance. Since firm size affects the company's strategy, organizational goals, and competitive environment, non-financial performance is also influenced by these factors. Therefore, the larger the firm, the better its sustainability performance. This finding is in line with the findings of Mousanejad et al. (2021) and Yaghoubian et al. (2021).The test of the second hypothesis indicates a negative and significant impact of environmental complexity and uncertainty on non-financial sustainability performance. Non-financial sustainability performance, which encompasses diverse aspects of the company's activities such as employees, the role of shareholders, supplier contracts, internal processes, and service quality, is relevant to health indicators. The presence and increase of environmental uncertainty negatively affect the quality of these factors, meaning that environmental uncertainty and complexity reduce non-financial sustainability performance. This result is consistent with the findings of Yuliusman et al. (2023) and contradicts the findings of Yaghoubian et al. (2021).In the third hypothesis, no significant relationship between board independence and non-financial sustainability performance was documented. This finding can be explained by the fact that several factors, including the specific characteristics of companies, can affect the relationship between board independence and non-financial sustainability. Therefore, no significant relationship between these two variables was found in the companies studied.In the fourth hypothesis, the moderating role of management optimism, as one of the behavioral dimensions of managers, was investigated in the relationship between firm size and non-financial sustainability performance. The findings indicate a positive effect of management optimism on this relationship. In other words, management optimism strengthens the relationship between firm size and non-financial sustainability performance.The fifth and sixth hypotheses examined the moderating role of management optimism on the relationship between complexity, environmental uncertainty, and board independence with non-financial sustainability performance. The findings showed that management optimism does not moderate the relationship between environmental uncertainty, company complexity, and board independence with non-financial sustainability performance.The moderating role of management myopia on the relationship between contingency variables and non-financial sustainability performance was investigated in the seventh to ninth hypotheses. The findings indicate that management myopia does not moderate the relationship between firm size, complexity, and environmental uncertainty with non-financial sustainability performance. However, regarding the relationship between board independence and non-financial sustainability performance, management myopia, as a moderating variable, has changed the direction of the relationship, resulting in a negative effect of board independence on non-financial sustainability performance. In other words, management myopia leads to reduced attention to non-financial sustainability performance under conditions of greater managerial independence, thereby degrading this performance.رابطه بین عوامل اقتضایی و عملکرد پایداری غیرمالی؛ نقش
Accounting and various aspects of finance
Mohammad Amri Asrami; Seyed Kazem Ebrahimi; Hossein Amini
Abstract
Compliance with social and environmental responsibilities is one of the requirements of the current competitive era, and the competitive pressure on companies in this situation imposes costs that can affect financial performance. This research investigates the moderating role of competitive strength ...
Read More
Compliance with social and environmental responsibilities is one of the requirements of the current competitive era, and the competitive pressure on companies in this situation imposes costs that can affect financial performance. This research investigates the moderating role of competitive strength in the relationship between social and environmental responsibilities and financial performance. The statistical sample for this research consists of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange between 2016 and 2021. Using a regular screening method, 108 companies were selected as samples. After checking the classical assumptions of regression, the panel data model with fixed effects was used. The results showed that social performance has a positive relationship with financial performance. Competitive strength has a negative moderating effect on the relationship between social performance and financial performance. Environmental performance also has a positive relationship with financial performance, and competitive strength has a negative moderating role in this relationship. According to the coefficients of the variables, the social dimension of the company is more effective in increasing performance than the environmental dimension.
Introduction
A balance must be established between the modernization process and social and environmental concerns. Additionally, society's expectations regarding moral, legal, economic, and public interests require companies to commit to the communities in which they operate (Porter & Kramer, 2011). On the other hand, the growing interest of companies, especially large, national, and multinational companies, to demonstrate better environmental and social performance as part of their corporate social responsibility policy is often reflected in their management structures and investment policies. In line with the social responsibility policy, companies invest in the environmental field for three reasons: complying with environmental and social regulations and standards, improving company conditions, creating a favorable image of the company for society, and gaining access to other markets (Zaid et al., 2020).
Social responsibilities have been utilized in various businesses to achieve a competitive advantage and create stable relationships with society. In this regard, the theory of social responsibilities refers to the combined pursuit of economic progress, social equality, and environmental protection. The nature of social responsibilities is the interconnected and mutual realization of financial, social, and environmental goals (Donkor et al., 2023).
A company's environmental responsibility refers to its organizational behavior and commitment to the natural environment, which symbolizes the company's environmental ethics (Dilla et al., 2019). Several studies have shown conflicting results regarding a firm's environmental performance and financial performance. Some previous studies have shown that environmental responsibility improves long-term performance (Arda et al., 2019; Gilal et al., 2019). In addition, green knowledge and innovation promote an environmental orientation that allows companies to improve performance (Atan et al., 2018). On the contrary, since introducing environmental initiatives is costly (Zhang et al., 2019), evidence has shown that corporate environmental responsibility does not always lead to positive results (Chollet & Sandwidi, 2018). Based on a sample of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, this study examines the role of competitive strength in the relationship between firms’ social and environmental performance and financial performance.
Literature Review
Green theory emphasizes that community care helps organizations in sustainable development. Hence, government regulations and customer pressure encourage companies to adopt such practices in emerging markets. Environmental responsibility allows companies to improve their competitive advantages and dynamic capabilities (Arda et al., 2019). Incorporating environmental values supports environmental business in the long term (Gill et al., 2019). In general, green knowledge and innovation promote an environmental orientation and green resource management in companies, subsequently allowing them to improve their performance (Atan et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2019). Based on this, this research expects to improve the effectiveness of a company by using organizational resources for environmental performance while simultaneously improving social performance.
Proponents of the positive effects of CSR argue that CSR enhances corporate value and image, as well as develops brand positioning, reputation, and corporate image, which in turn enhances financial performance in the long run (Hill, 2020). It is often assumed that the proper use of economic, social, and governance standards requires higher financial efficiency and performance.
Managers of firms with fewer resources have fewer opportunities to divert resources to their advantage (Kumar et al., 2023). They are more concerned about their presence in the market and maintaining their market share in the industry, and they consider themselves less socially responsible towards the company, market, and society (Jiang et al., 2019). The moderating power of competition encourages companies to act in socially responsible ways and helps maintain their reputation (Chih et al., 2010; Graafland, 2018). The intensity of competition affects decisions related to social responsibilities, including social and environmental performance (Jiang et al., 2019). Different levels of competition affect the relationship between the social and environmental performance of companies. Social practices and environmental ethics are intangible assets for a company in capital markets, and these assets change with shifts in competition levels. In particular, considering the role of competitive strength, the relationship between social performance and environmental performance with financial performance changes as the level of competition fluctuates (Saeed et al., 2023). Therefore, the following hypotheses can be proposed:
Hypothesis 1: There is a positive relationship between social performance and financial performance.
Hypothesis 2: Competitive strength moderates the relationship between social performance and financial performance.
Hypothesis 3: There is a positive relationship between environmental performance and financial performance.
Hypothesis 4: Competitive strength moderates the relationship between environmental performance and financial performance.
Methodology
This research is practical and post-event, conducted using the secondary data collection method. The information from companies was collected by referring to the Codal.ir website and using their financial statements and attached notes. The study period covers 2016 to 2021. Before testing the proposed model and hypotheses, the assumptions of the regression models were checked. The Chow test, Hausman test, and variance heterogeneity test indicated that the panel data model with fixed effects is suitable for the models of this research. In this study, the Breusch-Pagan-Godfrey test was used to check for heteroscedasticity. The results of the heteroscedasticity analysis show that the residuals of the normal regression models do not have constant variance, indicating heteroscedasticity, and the generalized least squares method was used to address this issue.
Results
The variable coefficient of social performance in models 1 and 2 is 0.0092 and 0.019, respectively, and is significant at the 99% confidence level in both models. There is a positive relationship between social performance and financial performance, meaning that compliance with social responsibilities leads to an increase in financial performance. However, in model 2, the moderating variable (strength of competition) reverses the relationship between social performance and financial performance. At the 99% confidence level, the strength of competition has a negative effect on the relationship between social performance and financial performance. The variable coefficient of environmental performance in models 3 and 4 is 0.003 and 0.004, respectively, and is significant at the 95% confidence level. There is a positive relationship between environmental performance and financial performance, indicating that compliance with environmental responsibilities leads to an increase in financial performance. In model 4, the sign of the coefficient for the moderating variable (strength of competition) is positive, meaning that the strength of competition has a positive relationship with financial performance. However, the moderating variable reverses the relationship between environmental performance and financial performance, so at the 99% confidence level, the strength of competition has a negative effect on the relationship between environmental performance and financial performance.
Conclusion
Disclosure of social performance leads to increased financial performance. The disclosure of social performance by the company, as a positive signal to the market and shareholders, directly benefits the improvement of the company’s reputation and value. Additionally, this disclosure can indirectly affect the company’s financial performance through mediators such as competitive advantage, reputation, customer satisfaction, access to capital, and environmental resource efficiency. The company's competitive advantages are one of the important dimensions of market characteristics that company leaders should consider in their efforts to make optimal decisions to maximize financial performance. When there are no competitive pressures, managers may become lax in their duties, leading to poor management and high agency costs.
Disclosure of environmental performance also leads to increased financial performance. Compliance with environmental responsibilities and publication of periodic reports raise awareness and judgment among society and stakeholders, thereby strengthening the company's brand. To ensure that environmental goals are met, environmental functions such as the development of environmental policies and programs, setting quantitative and measurable goals for reducing environmental pollution, implementing pollution prevention obligations, measuring and evaluating potential environmental effects, revising executive plans, and making reforms must be carried out.
Competitive strength has a negative moderating role in the relationship between environmental responsibilities and financial performance. Today, governments support and encourage companies to fulfill social and environmental responsibilities. On the other hand, when facing external pressures, companies rely on government support and try to attract technical and financial incentives to carry out social and environmental responsibilities at a lower cost and more easily. By actively implementing social and environmental responsibilities, companies can communicate with governing bodies and actively participate in the development and approval of environmental responsibility programs. These actions help companies gain external legitimacy and promote their corporate brand. In this way, by taking advantage of these factors, companies can increase profitability while raising product prices and consolidating customer loyalty. Additionally, emphasizing the reduction of physical waste through environmentally friendly solutions can lay the groundwork for reducing costs and increasing profitability.
Financial Accounting
Azam Valizadeh Larijani; Farzaneh Yousefi Asl; Fatemeh Shirzadi; Niloofar Zamani
Abstract
Compliance with social and environmental responsibilities is one of the requirements of the current competitive era, and the competitive pressure on companies in this situation imposes costs that can affect financial performance. This research investigates the moderating role of competitive strength ...
Read More
Compliance with social and environmental responsibilities is one of the requirements of the current competitive era, and the competitive pressure on companies in this situation imposes costs that can affect financial performance. This research investigates the moderating role of competitive strength in the relationship between social and environmental responsibilities and financial performance. The statistical sample for this research consists of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange between 2016 and 2021. Using a regular screening method, 108 companies were selected as samples. After checking the classical assumptions of regression, the panel data model with fixed effects was used. The results showed that social performance has a positive relationship with financial performance. Competitive strength has a negative moderating effect on the relationship between social performance and financial performance. Environmental performance also has a positive relationship with financial performance, and competitive strength has a negative moderating role in this relationship. According to the coefficients of the variables, the social dimension of the company is more effective in increasing performance than the environmental dimension. IntroductionA balance must be established between the modernization process and social and environmental concerns. Additionally, society's expectations regarding moral, legal, economic, and public interests require companies to commit to the communities in which they operate (Porter & Kramer, 2011). On the other hand, the growing interest of companies, especially large, national, and multinational companies, to demonstrate better environmental and social performance as part of their corporate social responsibility policy is often reflected in their management structures and investment policies. In line with the social responsibility policy, companies invest in the environmental field for three reasons: complying with environmental and social regulations and standards, improving company conditions, creating a favorable image of the company for society, and gaining access to other markets (Zaid et al., 2020).Social responsibilities have been utilized in various businesses to achieve a competitive advantage and create stable relationships with society. In this regard, the theory of social responsibilities refers to the combined pursuit of economic progress, social equality, and environmental protection. The nature of social responsibilities is the interconnected and mutual realization of financial, social, and environmental goals (Donkor et al., 2023).A company's environmental responsibility refers to its organizational behavior and commitment to the natural environment, which symbolizes the company's environmental ethics (Dilla et al., 2019). Several studies have shown conflicting results regarding a firm's environmental performance and financial performance. Some previous studies have shown that environmental responsibility improves long-term performance (Arda et al., 2019; Gilal et al., 2019). In addition, green knowledge and innovation promote an environmental orientation that allows companies to improve performance (Atan et al., 2018). On the contrary, since introducing environmental initiatives is costly (Zhang et al., 2019), evidence has shown that corporate environmental responsibility does not always lead to positive results (Chollet & Sandwidi, 2018). Based on a sample of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, this study examines the role of competitive strength in the relationship between firms’ social and environmental performance and financial performance. Literature ReviewGreen theory emphasizes that community care helps organizations in sustainable development. Hence, government regulations and customer pressure encourage companies to adopt such practices in emerging markets. Environmental responsibility allows companies to improve their competitive advantages and dynamic capabilities (Arda et al., 2019). Incorporating environmental values supports environmental business in the long term (Gill et al., 2019). In general, green knowledge and innovation promote an environmental orientation and green resource management in companies, subsequently allowing them to improve their performance (Atan et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2019). Based on this, this research expects to improve the effectiveness of a company by using organizational resources for environmental performance while simultaneously improving social performance.Proponents of the positive effects of CSR argue that CSR enhances corporate value and image, as well as develops brand positioning, reputation, and corporate image, which in turn enhances financial performance in the long run (Hill, 2020). It is often assumed that the proper use of economic, social, and governance standards requires higher financial efficiency and performance.Managers of firms with fewer resources have fewer opportunities to divert resources to their advantage (Kumar et al., 2023). They are more concerned about their presence in the market and maintaining their market share in the industry, and they consider themselves less socially responsible towards the company, market, and society (Jiang et al., 2019). The moderating power of competition encourages companies to act in socially responsible ways and helps maintain their reputation (Chih et al., 2010; Graafland, 2018). The intensity of competition affects decisions related to social responsibilities, including social and environmental performance (Jiang et al., 2019). Different levels of competition affect the relationship between the social and environmental performance of companies. Social practices and environmental ethics are intangible assets for a company in capital markets, and these assets change with shifts in competition levels. In particular, considering the role of competitive strength, the relationship between social performance and environmental performance with financial performance changes as the level of competition fluctuates (Saeed et al., 2023). Therefore, the following hypotheses can be proposed:Hypothesis 1: There is a positive relationship between social performance and financial performance.Hypothesis 2: Competitive strength moderates the relationship between social performance and financial performance.Hypothesis 3: There is a positive relationship between environmental performance and financial performance.Hypothesis 4: Competitive strength moderates the relationship between environmental performance and financial performance. MethodologyThis research is practical and post-event, conducted using the secondary data collection method. The information from companies was collected by referring to the Codal.ir website and using their financial statements and attached notes. The study period covers 2016 to 2021. Before testing the proposed model and hypotheses, the assumptions of the regression models were checked. The Chow test, Hausman test, and variance heterogeneity test indicated that the panel data model with fixed effects is suitable for the models of this research. In this study, the Breusch-Pagan-Godfrey test was used to check for heteroscedasticity. The results of the heteroscedasticity analysis show that the residuals of the normal regression models do not have constant variance, indicating heteroscedasticity, and the generalized least squares method was used to address this issue. ResultsThe variable coefficient of social performance in models 1 and 2 is 0.0092 and 0.019, respectively, and is significant at the 99% confidence level in both models. There is a positive relationship between social performance and financial performance, meaning that compliance with social responsibilities leads to an increase in financial performance. However, in model 2, the moderating variable (strength of competition) reverses the relationship between social performance and financial performance. At the 99% confidence level, the strength of competition has a negative effect on the relationship between social performance and financial performance. The variable coefficient of environmental performance in models 3 and 4 is 0.003 and 0.004, respectively, and is significant at the 95% confidence level. There is a positive relationship between environmental performance and financial performance, indicating that compliance with environmental responsibilities leads to an increase in financial performance. In model 4, the sign of the coefficient for the moderating variable (strength of competition) is positive, meaning that the strength of competition has a positive relationship with financial performance. However, the moderating variable reverses the relationship between environmental performance and financial performance, so at the 99% confidence level, the strength of competition has a negative effect on the relationship between environmental performance and financial performance. ConclusionDisclosure of social performance leads to increased financial performance. The disclosure of social performance by the company, as a positive signal to the market and shareholders, directly benefits the improvement of the company’s reputation and value. Additionally, this disclosure can indirectly affect the company’s financial performance through mediators such as competitive advantage, reputation, customer satisfaction, access to capital, and environmental resource efficiency. The company's competitive advantages are one of the important dimensions of market characteristics that company leaders should consider in their efforts to make optimal decisions to maximize financial performance. When there are no competitive pressures, managers may become lax in their duties, leading to poor management and high agency costs.Disclosure of environmental performance also leads to increased financial performance. Compliance with environmental responsibilities and publication of periodic reports raise awareness and judgment among society and stakeholders, thereby strengthening the company's brand. To ensure that environmental goals are met, environmental functions such as the development of environmental policies and programs, setting quantitative and measurable goals for reducing environmental pollution, implementing pollution prevention obligations, measuring and evaluating potential environmental effects, revising executive plans, and making reforms must be carried out.Competitive strength has a negative moderating role in the relationship between environmental responsibilities and financial performance. Today, governments support and encourage companies to fulfill social and environmental responsibilities. On the other hand, when facing external pressures, companies rely on government support and try to attract technical and financial incentives to carry out social and environmental responsibilities at a lower cost and more easily. By actively implementing social and environmental responsibilities, companies can communicate with governing bodies and actively participate in the development and approval of environmental responsibility programs. These actions help companies gain external legitimacy and promote their corporate brand. In this way, by taking advantage of these factors, companies can increase profitability while raising product prices and consolidating customer loyalty. Additionally, emphasizing the reduction of physical waste through environmentally friendly solutions can lay the groundwork for reducing costs and increasing profitability.
Accounting and various aspects of finance
Mohsen Borzouzadeh Zavareh; Mohammad Reza Nikbakht
Abstract
This article aims to evaluate the performance of staff at the National Treasury following the implementation of an electronic fund request system. This evaluation is conducted using the Balanced Scorecard approach. The research methodology employed is descriptive and applied in nature. The study’s ...
Read More
This article aims to evaluate the performance of staff at the National Treasury following the implementation of an electronic fund request system. This evaluation is conducted using the Balanced Scorecard approach. The research methodology employed is descriptive and applied in nature. The study’s statistical population comprises 53 experts, auditors, and managers from the National Treasury, working at the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Finance. This group also includes the implementers and specialists of the electronic fund request system. The validity of the questionnaires was determined using content validity, and reliability was established with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.883. The study’s findings suggest that the performance of National Treasury staff, post-implementation of the electronic fund request system, is satisfactory when viewed through the lens of the Balanced Scorecard. The key criterion for evaluating the performance of National Treasury staff is empowerment, with an average rank of 3.25.
Introduction
Success in the implementation of electronic government in any country requires a model tailored to the goals, requirements, and conditions of that country. Therefore, a lack of proper planning can lead to neglecting needs and failure in achieving the goals. However, planning alone is not enough to guide and evaluate the performance of companies in an era where creating value and generating wealth through investment in customers, suppliers, employees, processes, technology, and innovation is essential.
Research question:
Is the performance of the employees of the General Treasury Department optimal from the perspectives of financial, customers, internal processes, and growth and learning dimensions of the Balanced Scorecard after the implementation of the electronic fund request system?
Literature review
The Balanced Scorecard presents a framework for articulating strategies aimed at generating value for an organization’s stakeholders, including shareholders, customers, and citizens. Over the years, the Balanced Scorecard has evolved significantly. It began as a performance evaluation tool in 1990, featuring performance dimensions, strategic objectives, key indicators, and performance-related rewards. By 1996, it had transformed into a new management system, emphasizing organizational learning, the identification of operational issues, feedback for future planning, and fostering organizational knowledge, along with the introduction of the PDCA management cycle. In 2001, it was presented as a framework for facilitating change.
Methodology
Drawing upon the models scrutinized in the research trajectory and theoretical underpinnings, this study evaluates employee performance within the country’s General Treasury. It employs the Balanced Scorecard approach and uses the Treasury as a case study to formulate the research model. This research is applied in nature, utilizing the cognitive and informational context provided by foundational research to address needs. The aim of applied research is to devise solutions for operational issues, and its results should be implementable. Furthermore, in terms of its nature and methodology, this research is descriptive (survey research). The objective of conducting descriptive research is to depict the tangible and actual characteristics of a subject or phenomenon. The questionnaire’s validity was confirmed by a group of university experts and professors, and its reliability was affirmed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (α=0.883). Following the distribution, collection, and analysis of information, a consensus was reached among experts to position the criteria within each of the four dimensions of the BSC.
Result
Upon collection and extraction, the questionnaires were processed using SPSS statistical software for analysis. Descriptive statistics were utilized, including frequency, frequency percentage, mean, and standard deviation.
Discussion
This study uses the one-sample t-test for analyzing and measuring the questions. To identify which scale of the Balanced Scorecard approach is prioritized, the Friedman test was utilized. Furthermore, to determine which micro-variable of the Balanced Scorecard approach’s scales received the highest score, the mean and, more specifically, descriptive charts were used.
In this regard, we discuss the 4 main research questions.
First question:
According to the one-sample t-test, since the significance level (sig) is 0.005, which is less than the standard level of 0.05, and given that the t-test value is reported as 2.944, which is greater than the standard level of 1.96, zero does not fall within the upper and lower limits. Considering the descriptive statistics of the t-test, the acquired mean in the sample is reported as 3.39, which is 0.39 higher than the population mean (3).
Second question:
Considering the one-sample t-test, since the significance level (sig) is 0.0001 and this value is less than the standard level of 0.05, and given that the t-test value is reported as 6.606 which is greater than the standard level of 1.96, zero does not fall within the upper and lower limits. Considering the descriptive statistics of the t-test, the acquired mean in the sample is reported as 3.58, which is 0.58 higher than the population mean (3).
Third question:
Since the significance level (sig) is 0.0001 and this value is less than the standard level of 0.05, and given that the t-test value is reported as 4.261, which is greater than the standard level of 1.96, zero does not fall within the upper and lower limits. Considering the descriptive statistics of the t-test, the acquired mean in the sample is reported as 3.37, which is 0.37 higher than the population mean (3). Therefore, it can be generally concluded that after the implementation of the Electronic Fund Request System, from the internal processes perspective (except for the two dimensions of binding instructions and lack of focus), the performance of the employees of the General Treasury is satisfactory.
Fourth question:
Considering the one-sample t-test, since the significance level (sig) is 0.0001 and this value is less than the standard level of 0.05, and given that the t-test value is reported as 5.137, which is greater than the standard level of 1.96, zero does not fall within the upper and lower limits. Considering the descriptive statistics of the t-test, the acquired mean in the sample is reported as 3.47, which is 0.47 higher than the population mean (3). Therefore, it can be generally concluded that after the implementation of the Electronic Fund Request System, from the growth and learning perspective (empowerment, culture and values, satisfaction with the work environment, quality of training courses, and satisfaction with professionalism), the performance of the employees of the General Treasury is satisfactory.
Conclusion
The findings of the study indicated that empowerment, with an average rank of 3.25, secured the highest rank and was of significant importance. Subsequently, culture and values, quality of training courses, job satisfaction, and satisfaction with the work environment were also deemed important. This research provided a holistic view of the performance of the employees of the General Treasury, rather than focusing on just one aspect of performance. In essence, alongside financial measures, aspects such as customer experiences, employee growth, and process improvement and efficiency were also taken into account.
Financial Accounting
Mahmood Madhoosh; Mehdi Safari gerayli; Javad Ramezani; Javad Babaee Khalili; Mehdi Khalilpour
Abstract
This study, while identifying the emerging fields of human rights accounting development in Iran's capital market, seeks to evaluate them within the context of the research. Using interviews and the grounded theory process, through three stages of open, central, and selective coding, an attempt was made ...
Read More
This study, while identifying the emerging fields of human rights accounting development in Iran's capital market, seeks to evaluate them within the context of the research. Using interviews and the grounded theory process, through three stages of open, central, and selective coding, an attempt was made to develop the theoretical framework of the phenomenon. Finally, through the matrix processes, the most effective field of human rights accounting development was determined in the context of the study. The results of the qualitative part of this study, from a total of 321 open codes, indicate the identification of 32 themes, 6 components, and 3 main categories. IntroductionHuman rights are considered one of the key objectives of international institutes and organizations today, influencing various aspects of social functions. In addition to identifying the emerging contexts of human rights development in Iran’s capital market, this study seeks to evaluate these contexts within the research framework. Conducting such a study can serve as a basis for research innovation from a methodological perspective, while also contributing to the theoretical literature on human rights accounting and increasing the level of theoretical knowledge on the subject. This is particularly relevant given the structural features of companies in different societies and capital markets.Theoretical frameworkHuman rights represent a level of adjudication that every human, by nature, should enjoy. The dimensions of human rights include inherent rights, equal rights, inalienable rights, and universal rights. Human rights are a set of rights that arise from human nature, and every person in society should enjoy them without exception. Two narrow and wide approaches can be identified at the theoretical level. The wide approach is a process based on the limitless flow of data at the societal level, where information can be accessed, transferred, and publicized freely. In this way, freedom of information in human rights regulations refers to the people's right to access all types of information, including information in financial markets (McDonagh, 2020). The narrow approach, which emerged due to changes in the international community over time, narrows the range of information freedom and focuses exclusively on citizens' freedom to access information held by governmental institutions.MethodologyThe present study is developmental in terms of results, exploratory in terms of purpose, and combinatory in terms of data type. In the qualitative part, data were first collected through interviews using open, axial, and selective coding to identify the emerging contexts of human rights accounting in capital market companies. To confirm the reliability of the identified contextual axes, the Fuzzy Delphi analysis process was employed. Subsequently, in the quantitative part, the study seeks to prioritize the most effective axes using matrix analyses with row i and column j and MATLAB software. Given the nature of the study, which combines data collection processes in both qualitative and quantitative parts, the initial stages involved conducting interviews to gradually reach theoretical saturation by identifying the emerging contexts in human rights accounting through unstructured, in-depth interviews and designing open-ended questions. After developing the conceptual codes from the interviews, the process shifted to semi-structured and structured interviews to differentiate the components, creating general categories to facilitate theoretical saturation.Research findingsIn this section, the findings from the data-based theoretical analysis in the qualitative part are first presented to design a model, followed by matrix analysis to advance the objectives of the quantitative part. In the qualitative part, 14 accounting experts were interviewed using a three-stage coding process within the data-based theory to identify the emerging contexts of human rights development at the level of capital market companies, forming a theoretical framework. Based on the specification of coding processes according to Glasier's approach in data-based analysis, a theoretical framework related to emerging contexts in human rights accounting development can be proposed at the level of capital market companies.Next, Fuzzy Delphi analysis is employed to determine the experts' consensus regarding the appropriateness of the research components with the identified categories in the emerging contexts of human rights accounting development. Fuzzy Delphi analysis was used to assess the reliability and fit of the main components of the proposed model. All identified components were confirmed in the qualitative stage, and theoretical consensus was achieved. Therefore, this study shows that the most important context in the emerging development of human rights accounting in capital market companies is the development of effective governance functions aimed at motivating equal approaches among operational and financial units within the company and its stakeholders.Discussion and conclusionThe purpose of the present study is to evaluate the emerging contexts in human rights accounting development in Iran’s capital market. Grounded Theory was used to establish a theoretical framework for this phenomenon. A total of 321 open codes, 32 themes, 6 components, and 3 main categories were derived from 14 interviews, totaling approximately 830 minutes. Based on this analysis, a model related to the emerging contexts in human rights accounting development was proposed for Iran’s capital market.Matrix analysis revealed that the most important context in the emerging development of human rights accounting in capital market companies is the development of effective governance functions to promote equal approaches between the financial and operational units of the company and its stakeholders. The role of corporate governance as an influential factor in human rights accounting development includes fostering diversity in the selection of board members to represent various stockholder groups, considering factors such as religion, race, and gender. This diversity can enhance the effectiveness of supervision over managers and financial units.Implementing this approach can strengthen shareholders’ motivation to enter the capital market and invest in companies with a commitment to human rights. Developing accounting management information systems under governance supervision can facilitate the advancement of human rights accounting by enhancing the financial reporting language. Furthermore, these systems can significantly contribute to the creation of a data bank in companies, enabling them to report to human rights institutions. To keep their financial functions up-to-date with human rights compliance at the capital market level, it is crucial for companies to adhere to human rights management accounting information systems and invest in these areas to provide more robust information.Given the importance of corporate governance as an effective mechanism in shaping human rights accounting in capital market companies, it is recommended that boards of directors strengthen managerial oversight by focusing on the behavioral, ethical, and operational aspects of companies, ensuring the equal protection of citizens’ rights in accounting processes and procedures.
Financial audit
Mehdi Eskandari; Seyed Yousef Ahadi Serkani; Seyede Atefe Hosseine
Abstract
The purpose of this research is presenting a pathological framework of teamwork in auditing by matrix ranking process.
The aim of this study is to present a pathological framework of teamwork in auditing using a matrix ranking process. This study employs a mixed-methods and exploratory approach due ...
Read More
The purpose of this research is presenting a pathological framework of teamwork in auditing by matrix ranking process.
The aim of this study is to present a pathological framework of teamwork in auditing using a matrix ranking process. This study employs a mixed-methods and exploratory approach due to the lack of identification of vulnerable areas of teamism in the auditing profession. The grounded theory method was applied to determine the dimensions of the model through fuzzy Delphi analysis. There is a content similarity between the components representing the central field of damage of teamism in the auditing profession and the identified categories. Using the interpretive ranking process, an attempt was made to prioritize the identified axes. The results of this study, based on 12 interviews in the qualitative phase and the model presentation, indicate the existence of 3 categories, 8 components, and 42 conceptual themes. In the second phase of the research, it was also determined that individual perception disorder is the most significant issue that the audit teams face in the process of sharing information and focusing on collaborative methods. This issue can seriously challenge the performance of audit teams.
Introduction
In organizational structures, one of the most important processes for fostering participation and information sharing is developing team orientation to achieve effectiveness. In other words, participation and the creation of synergy are considered key outcomes of team orientation, through which any organization can improve competitive results. However, it is important to note that some professions benefit more from team orientation because the specific characteristics of certain jobs, particularly those involving the sharing of knowledge and experience, can yield greater advantages. Auditing is one of such profession that relies on team orientation due to the specialized knowledge and experience required. Auditing teams are structured according to certain norms designed to improve knowledge sharing and learning.
Literature Review
At the onset of interpersonal communication, the concept of a group was viewed as a collaborative function. This was believed to yield more long-term results compared to individual decision-making, as joint efforts between individuals were thought to provide better solutions to the organization’s challenges. However, with the development of behavioral research in the functional fields of the group, it became evident that, like previous theories, the group offered only proportional efficiency for the organization and did not significantly differ from individual decision-making in terms of effectiveness. In fact, issues within the group, such as power dynamics, fear, and frustration among members, particularly among minority stakeholders, often cause more disruptions in solving organizational problems and could impose significant costs on the organization.
Methodology
The research approach of the present study, in terms of data collection logic, is hybrid in nature. This is because it examines a phenomenon for which no comprehensive framework exists in the theoretical literature of the auditing profession, nor is there a consensus. Therefore, the study begins by analyzing the qualitative data and relying on the data theory method of the foundation, aiming to identify the dimensions of the damages of the audit teams through a multidimensional model. For this purpose, Glaser's (1992) emergent approach is employed to formulate the audit teams' vulnerability framework, utilizing expert interviews conducted in three stages of coding.
Result
Based on the arguments presented in the methodology regarding the lack of a theoretical framework for team orientation vulnerability in the auditing profession, the foundation data theory analysis process, following Glazer's approach, was used as the basis for the qualitative section. In this analysis, a total of 315 open codes were generated from interviews with 12 identified accounting experts. Through a three-stage coding process, 8 components and 4 main categories were identified. To ensure the reliability of the identified dimensions, Fuzzy Delphi analysis was employed. The findings from this analysis confirm all the core areas of the damage of team orientation within the audit profession. Subsequently, to address the research question of determining the most significant central field of damage of team orientation within the auditing profession, the interpretive ranking process was utilized.
Discussion
In analyzing the obtained results, it can be stated that auditors, as members of the audit team, can effectively contribute to improving audit quality when each auditor can individually play a meaningful role in collaboration, due to their level of perceptual knowledge, which stems from behavioral and psychological characteristics, and their ability to share information.
Conclusion
The results indicate that auditors, as members of the audit team, can effectively contribute to improving audit quality when each auditor can individually play an active role in collaboration, due to their level of perceptual knowledge, which stems from behavioral and psychological characteristics.
