Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD student in Accounting, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan.Iran

2 Professor, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan , Isfahan, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan , Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Assets are crucial for companies' current and future decisions, significantly influencing investors' perceptions. This study investigates the relationship between accounting asset informativeness and investors' beliefs, with a focus on the impact of accounting earnings quality. A sample of 249 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange between 2013 and 2023 was selected for analysis. The results indicate that increased asset informativeness positively influences investors' beliefs at both the aggregate and discretionary levels. However, asset informativeness related to inherent factors does not impact investors' beliefs. Furthermore, low earnings quality does not weaken the relationship between asset informativeness at the aggregate level and discretionary factors with investors' beliefs.

Introduction

Investors' beliefs and expectations play a crucial role in their decision-making process and behavior. Assets are a key factor in a company's present and future decisions, significantly influencing investors' confidence. Accounting assets help reduce uncertainty about a share's true value and shape people's expectations of the company. In other words, they contain valuable information, reflecting high accounting asset informativeness. Notably, accounting asset informativeness is distinct from earnings indicators. As a result, low earnings quality does not affect investors' beliefs due to the presence of accounting asset informativeness. Therefore, earnings quality may not influence the correlation between accounting asset informativeness and investors' beliefs. Based on this, the research aims to explore the connection between accounting asset informativeness and investors' beliefs, with a focus on the influence of accounting earnings quality. The researchers propose two hypotheses: Accounting asset informativeness positively impacts investors' beliefs, and earnings quality does not moderate the influence of accounting asset informativeness on investors' beliefs.

Methodology

This study focuses on applied research. Accounting asset informativeness is the independent variable, calculated using the explanatory power of the regression of a company's net operating assets on its operating earnings. A 10-year rolling regression was conducted separately for each company. Investors' beliefs were the dependent variable, and the earnings quality served as the moderating variable. Earnings quality was determined based on four criteria: earnings stability, earnings smoothing, accruals quality, and the relationship between earnings and value. The study included a sample of 249 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, spanning from 2013 to 2023.

Results

The information provided by accounting assets has a positive impact on investors' beliefs at both the aggregate and discretionary levels. However, this information does not affect investors' beliefs when it comes to intrinsic factors. Additionally, low earnings quality does not weaken the relationship between accounting asset information at the aggregate level and discretionary factors with investors' beliefs.

Discussion

According to neoclassical investment theory, changes in a company's market value reflect investors' assessments of its intrinsic value based on available information. Therefore, the informativeness of a company's accounting assets can affect its stock performance. When a company's capital stock is inaccurately measured by its accounting assets, changes in market value will have a greater impact than changes in accounting assets. On the other hand, when accounting assets are measured with less error, they provide more accurate information about the company's resources. Investors use this information to estimate the market value of a company's stock and form expectations about its intrinsic value. If accounting asset informativeness is strong, investors rely on asset information to analyze the intrinsic value of the stock. It seems that even if the quality of earnings is weak, it does not significantly impact investors' decision-making. Therefore, low earnings quality cannot disrupt the relationship between accounting asset informativeness and shareholders' expectations.

Conclusion

Based on the findings, investors and financial statement users should consider asset informativeness when determining the true value of a share. It is important to note that financial statement information is not limited to profit and loss but also includes the measurement of assets on the balance sheet.
Creditors should not focus solely on profit and loss in their debt agreement; they should also consider the company's assets as a result of its current and future decisions. It is recommended that standard setters use asset informativeness to evaluate the effects of policy changes and balance sheet asset measurement changes to improve the implementation of accounting standards.
Analysts should consider asset informativeness as a fundamental factor during analysis, especially when earnings quality is low. Additionally, company managers and planners should specify the purpose of obtaining operational assets and the capacity of those assets during financial reporting to attract the attention of investors and creditors.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Abel, A. (1983). Optimal investment under uncertainty. American Economic Review, 73, 228–233. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1803942.
  2. Ani, M. K. A. (2021). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and financial reporting quality: Evidence from Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Borsa Istanbul Review21, S25-S37.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016‌/j.bir.2021.01.006
  3. Artikis, P. G., Diamantopoulou, L., Papanastasopoulos, G. A., & Sorros, J. N. (2022). Asset growth and stock returns in european equity markets: Implications of investment and accounting distortions. Journal of Corporate Finance73, 102193.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.‌2022.102193
  4. Bai, J., Philippon, T., & Savov, A. (2016). Have financial markets become more informative?. Journal of Financial Economics122(3), 625-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.08.005
  5. Barth, M. E., Li, K., & McClure, C. G. (2023). Evolution in value relevance of accounting information. The Accounting Review98(1), 1-28.‏ https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2019-0521
  6. Beisland, L. A., & Hamberg, M. (2013). Earnings sustainability, economic conditions and the value relevance of accounting information. Scandinavian Journal of Management29(3), 314-324.‏ https://doi.org/‌10.1016/j.scaman.2013.02.001
  7. Chen, Q., Schipper, K., & Zhang, N. (2022). Measuring accounting asset informativeness. The Accounting Review97(4), 209-236.‏ https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2019-0585
  8. Dechow, P., & Dichev, I., (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: the role of accrual estimation errors. Accounting Review, 77 (Supplement), 35–59. Available at SSRNhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/‌ssrn.277231
  9. Dichev, I. (2017). On the conceptual foundations of financial reporting. Accounting and Business Research, 47(6), 617–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2017.1299620.
  10. Dutta, S., & Nezlobin, A. (2017). Dynamic effects of information disclosure on investment efficiency. Journal of Accounting Research55(2), 329-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12161.
  11. Faulkender, M., & Wang, R. (2006). Corporate financial policy and the value of cash. The journal of finance61(4), 1957-1990.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00894.x
  12. Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P. M., & Schipper, K. (2004). Costs of equity and earnings attributes. The accounting review79(4), 967-1010.‏ https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.4.967
  13. Hann, R. N., Kim, H., Wang, W., & Zheng, Y. (2020). Information frictions and productivity dispersion: The role of accounting information. The Accounting Review95(3), 223-250.‏ https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52658.
  14. Hayashi, F. (1982). Tobin's marginal q and average q: A neoclassical interpretation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 213-224.‏ https://doi.org/10.2307/1912538.
  15. Hsu, C., Jin, Q., Ma, Z., & Zhou, J. (2021). Does voluntary balance sheet disclosure mitigate post-earnings-announcement drift?. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 40(2), 106821. https://doi.org/10.1016/‌j.jaccpubpol.2021.106821.
  16. Kanodia, C., Singh, R., & Spero, A. E. (2005). Imprecision in accounting measurement: Can it be value enhancing?. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(3), 487–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.‌2005.‌00178.x.
  17. Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of accounting and economics39(1), 163-197.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2005.00178.x
  18. Merkley, K., Michaely, R., & Pacelli, J. (2017). Does the scope of the sell‐side analyst industry matter? An examination of bias, accuracy, and information content of analyst reports. The Journal of Finance72(3), 1285-1334.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12485
  19. Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Yu, W. (2000). The information content of stock markets: why do emerging markets have synchronous stock price movements?. Journal of financial economics58(1-2), 215-260.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00071-4.
  20. Noordermeer, B., & Vorst, P. (2023). The Informativeness of Balance Sheet Disaggregations: Evidence from Forecasting Operating Assets. Available at SSRN 4338402.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/‌ssrn.4338402
  21. Ohlson, J. A., & Penman, S. H. (1992). Disaggregated accounting data as explanatory variables for returns. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance7(4), 553-573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X92007‌00407
  22. Pástor, Ľ., & Pietro, V. (2003). Stock valuation and learning about profitability. The Journal of Finance58(5), 1749-1789.‏ https://doi.org/‌10.1111/‌1540-6261.00587
  23. Rajgopal, S., & Venkatachalam, M. (2011). Financial reporting quality and idiosyncratic return volatility. Journal of Accounting and Economics51(1-2), 1-20.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016‌/j.jacceco.2010.‌06.001
  24. Susanto, Y. K., Pradipta, A., & Cecilia, E. (2019). Earnings management: ESOP and corporate governance. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal23, 1-13.‏ https://doi.org/10.34208/‌jba.v21i2.624.
  25. Tucker, J.W., & Zarowin, P.A. (2006). Does Income Smoothing Improve Earning Informativeness?. The Accounting Review, 81(1), 251-270. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4093136.
  26.  Aflatoni, A. (2016). Statistical analysis in financial and accounting studies with stata software, Terme Publications, first edition. [In Persian]
  27. Bai Lasheki, L., & Askari, M. R. (2010). Evaluation of the relationship between net operating assets (NOA) and stock returns in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange from 2008 to 2011. Journal of Economics and Business, 1(2), 61-73. [In Persian]
  28. Bari, S., & Foroughi, D., & Moarefi Mohammadi, A. H. (2021). Compilation of the relationship of investor's belief by the method of grounded theory. Accounting and Auditing Research, 13(50), 113-130. [In Persian]
  29. Barzideh, F., & Shahriari, A. (2014). A comprehensive review of the predictive power and information content of profit and loss and balance sheet variables in predicting future cash flows. Accounting and Auditing Research, 6(23), 88-101. [In Persian]
  30. Bolo, Q, Marfoo, M & Ghahrani, A. (2019). The impact of the quality of accounting information on the cost of equity of companies according to the role of information asymmetry and comparability of financial statements. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 17(68), 33-65. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjma.2021.39721.1957 [In Persian]
  31. Derakhshandeh, S., & Ahmadi, A. (2017). Evaluating the role of investors' beliefs on price direction and volume of transactions in the capital market. Financial knowledge of securities analysis, 51-63. [In Persian]Eskanderli, T., (2019). Examining the effect of accruals on the heterogeneity of investors' beliefs and the effect of their interaction on stock returns. Knowledge of Accounting and Management Audit, 8(29), 149-160. [In Persian]
  32. Meshki M, M., & Elahi_Roudpashti, S. (2013). Investigating the effect of conservatism on the market value of cash held. Experimental Accounting Research, 4(3), 23-43. Doi: 10.22051/JERA.2015.1882. [In Persian]
  33. Naboiyan, M, Nabavi Ch, A., Dadashi, I, & Mohseni, B. (2018). The effect of the final value of cash on the speed of adjustment of stock dividend according to the moderating role of liquidity shock. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 16(63), 157-187. https://doi.org/10.22054/‌qjma.2019.10650. [In Persian]
  34. Sajjadi, S. H., & Banabi G, R. (2022). The effect of state ownership on the relationship between information competition and earnings sustainability. Empirical Studies of Financial Accounting, 19(75), 41-68. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjma.2022.65345.2340. [In Persian]
  35. Esna Ashari, H., Asadi, G., & Kahraei, E. (2020). The relationship between earnings management patterns and investors' perceptions. Journal of Financial Accounting Research, 12(3), 45-62. [In Persian]
  36. Farajzadeh Dehkordi, H., Hemti, H., & Sanai, H. (2014). Inflated balance sheets and alternative methods to avoid negative windfalls. Management Accounting, 8(27), 57-70. [In Persian]
  37. Garcheh Moghadam, A., & Hemti, D. (2021). The impact of accruals quality on the relationship between investors' heterogeneous beliefs and stock returns. Accounting and Management Perspective, 4(48), 113-125. [In Persian]
  38. Jamali, B., Alipour, S., & Sheikhi Gurjan, M. (2019). Investigating the relationship between managers' discretion, net operating assets and stock returns in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Accounting and Management Perspective, 2(6), 31-48. [In Persian]
  39. Khalili, M., Aghaei, M. A., Qami, M. H. (2019). Presenting a model to quantify information content using information theory. Journal of Financial Accounting Research, 11(3), 1-18. [In Persian]
  40. Naderi, S., Heydarpour, F., & Yaqubnejad, A. (2018). The relationship between the quality of accounting information and the correlation of the company's growth rate with the industry. Financial accounting and auditing researches, 10(39), 191-218. [In Persian]
  41. Nowzari, R., Valipour, H., & Gholami, A. (2022). The effect of financial reporting quality on investors' decision, focusing on the informational role of the accrual part of profit volatility. Accounting and auditing research, 14(56), 117-132. [In Persian]
  42. Rezaei, Z., Ali Ahmadi, S., & Kaab Umair, A. (2019). Investigating the effect of the quality of disclosure of the nature of the business and financial performance of the company on the judgment of professional investors. Journal of Financial Accounting Research, 11(3), 51-70. [In Persian]