Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student, Department of Accounting, Noor Branch, Islamic Azad University, Noor, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, Bandargaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandargaz, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Noor Branch, Islamic Azad University, Noor, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Bandargaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandargaz, Iran

Abstract

This study, while identifying the emerging fields of human rights accounting development in Iran's capital market, seeks to evaluate them within the context of the research. Using interviews and the grounded theory process, through three stages of open, central, and selective coding, an attempt was made to develop the theoretical framework of the phenomenon. Finally, through the matrix processes, the most effective field of human rights accounting development was determined in the context of the study. The results of the qualitative part of this study, from a total of 321 open codes, indicate the identification of 32 themes, 6 components, and 3 main categories.
 

Introduction

Human rights are considered one of the key objectives of international institutes and organizations today, influencing various aspects of social functions. In addition to identifying the emerging contexts of human rights development in Iran’s capital market, this study seeks to evaluate these contexts within the research framework. Conducting such a study can serve as a basis for research innovation from a methodological perspective, while also contributing to the theoretical literature on human rights accounting and increasing the level of theoretical knowledge on the subject. This is particularly relevant given the structural features of companies in different societies and capital markets.

Theoretical framework

Human rights represent a level of adjudication that every human, by nature, should enjoy. The dimensions of human rights include inherent rights, equal rights, inalienable rights, and universal rights. Human rights are a set of rights that arise from human nature, and every person in society should enjoy them without exception. Two narrow and wide approaches can be identified at the theoretical level. The wide approach is a process based on the limitless flow of data at the societal level, where information can be accessed, transferred, and publicized freely. In this way, freedom of information in human rights regulations refers to the people's right to access all types of information, including information in financial markets (McDonagh, 2020). The narrow approach, which emerged due to changes in the international community over time, narrows the range of information freedom and focuses exclusively on citizens' freedom to access information held by governmental institutions.

Methodology

The present study is developmental in terms of results, exploratory in terms of purpose, and combinatory in terms of data type. In the qualitative part, data were first collected through interviews using open, axial, and selective coding to identify the emerging contexts of human rights accounting in capital market companies. To confirm the reliability of the identified contextual axes, the Fuzzy Delphi analysis process was employed. Subsequently, in the quantitative part, the study seeks to prioritize the most effective axes using matrix analyses with row i and column j and MATLAB software. Given the nature of the study, which combines data collection processes in both qualitative and quantitative parts, the initial stages involved conducting interviews to gradually reach theoretical saturation by identifying the emerging contexts in human rights accounting through unstructured, in-depth interviews and designing open-ended questions. After developing the conceptual codes from the interviews, the process shifted to semi-structured and structured interviews to differentiate the components, creating general categories to facilitate theoretical saturation.

Research findings

In this section, the findings from the data-based theoretical analysis in the qualitative part are first presented to design a model, followed by matrix analysis to advance the objectives of the quantitative part. In the qualitative part, 14 accounting experts were interviewed using a three-stage coding process within the data-based theory to identify the emerging contexts of human rights development at the level of capital market companies, forming a theoretical framework. Based on the specification of coding processes according to Glasier's approach in data-based analysis, a theoretical framework related to emerging contexts in human rights accounting development can be proposed at the level of capital market companies.
Next, Fuzzy Delphi analysis is employed to determine the experts' consensus regarding the appropriateness of the research components with the identified categories in the emerging contexts of human rights accounting development. Fuzzy Delphi analysis was used to assess the reliability and fit of the main components of the proposed model. All identified components were confirmed in the qualitative stage, and theoretical consensus was achieved. Therefore, this study shows that the most important context in the emerging development of human rights accounting in capital market companies is the development of effective governance functions aimed at motivating equal approaches among operational and financial units within the company and its stakeholders.

Discussion and conclusion

The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the emerging contexts in human rights accounting development in Iran’s capital market. Grounded Theory was used to establish a theoretical framework for this phenomenon. A total of 321 open codes, 32 themes, 6 components, and 3 main categories were derived from 14 interviews, totaling approximately 830 minutes. Based on this analysis, a model related to the emerging contexts in human rights accounting development was proposed for Iran’s capital market.
Matrix analysis revealed that the most important context in the emerging development of human rights accounting in capital market companies is the development of effective governance functions to promote equal approaches between the financial and operational units of the company and its stakeholders. The role of corporate governance as an influential factor in human rights accounting development includes fostering diversity in the selection of board members to represent various stockholder groups, considering factors such as religion, race, and gender. This diversity can enhance the effectiveness of supervision over managers and financial units.
Implementing this approach can strengthen shareholders’ motivation to enter the capital market and invest in companies with a commitment to human rights. Developing accounting management information systems under governance supervision can facilitate the advancement of human rights accounting by enhancing the financial reporting language. Furthermore, these systems can significantly contribute to the creation of a data bank in companies, enabling them to report to human rights institutions. To keep their financial functions up-to-date with human rights compliance at the capital market level, it is crucial for companies to adhere to human rights management accounting information systems and invest in these areas to provide more robust information.
Given the importance of corporate governance as an effective mechanism in shaping human rights accounting in capital market companies, it is recommended that boards of directors strengthen managerial oversight by focusing on the behavioral, ethical, and operational aspects of companies, ensuring the equal protection of citizens’ rights in accounting processes and procedures.
 
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Alamad, S. (2023). Conceptualising accounting as a value-based concept in the context of alternative finance, Journal of Accounting Literature. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-03-2023-0042
  2. Beiter, K. (2014). The protection of the right to academic mobility under international human rights law, Academic Mobility (International Perspectives on Higher Education Research, Vol. 11), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, 243-265. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-362820140000011019
  3. Berrou, R. (2021). Five essays on regulation, capital market financing and asset pricing in the era of sustainable finance (2005 - 2019). (Doctoral Dissertation, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne - Paris I), 1-165.
  4. Breakey, H. (2017). Arbitrary Power, Arbitrary Interference and the Abuse of Power: Corruption, Natural Rights and Human Rights, Responsible Leadership and Ethical Decision-Making (Research in Ethical Issues in Organizations, Vol. 17), Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, 125-145. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-209620170000017013
  5. Buhmann, K., Faterling, B., & Voiculescu, A. (2018). Business & human rights research methods, Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 36(4), 323-332.
  6. Buntaine, M. T. (2015). Accountability in Global Governance: Civil Society Claims for Environmental Performance at the World Bank, International Studies Quarterly, 59(1), 99-111.
  7. Cahaya, F.R., & Hervina, R. (2019). Do human rights issues matter? An empirical analysis of Indonesian companies’ reporting, Social Responsibility Journal, 15(2), 226-243. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-10-2016-0171
  8. Dang Trung, H., & Do, L. Ph. (2018). Freedom of Information Law Comes to Vietnam: How Do Human Rights Adapt to Goals of Economic Development and Political Stability? Australian Journal of Asian Law, 18(2), 167-184. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3144892
  9. Donnelly, J. (2007). International Human Rights, Westwiew Press.
  10. Donnelly, J. (2019). How does Dignity Ground Human Rights? Mahmoudi, H. and Penn, M.L. (Ed.) Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Human Dignity and Human Rights, Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, 61-67. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-821-620191006
  11. Elkelish, W. (2022). Accounting for Corporate Human Rights: Literature Review and Future Insights, Australian Accounting Review, 33(2), 203-226. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4160789
  12. Esterhuyse, L., & du Toit, E. (2023). Reporting on Human Rights by Large Corporates: Interplay between Comprehensiveness and Narrative Manipulation, Seifi, S. and Crowther, D. (Ed.) Corporate Resilience (Developments in Corporate Governance and Responsibility, Vol. 21), Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, 219-242. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2043-052320230000021011
  13. Flint, A., Rabin, J. E., Blundell, A., & Strop, A. (2005). Reproducibility, power and validity of visual analogue in assessment of appetite sensation in single test meal studies, International Journal of Obesity, 24(2), 38-48.
  14. Glaser, B. G. (1992). Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, Calif.: Sociology Press.
  15. Goncharenko, G., & Khadaroo, I. (2020). Disciplining human rights organisations through an accounting regulation: A case of the ‘foreign agents’ law in Russia, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 72(3), 82-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2019.102129
  16. Gosine, M. (2011). Toward a Sociology of Human Rights, Papademas, D. (Ed.) Human Rights and Media (Studies in Communications, Vol. 6), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0275-7982(2011)0000006003
  17. Hall, M., & O'Dwyer, B. (2017). Accounting, non-governmental organizations and civil society: The importance of nonprofit organizations to understanding accounting, organizations and society, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 63(4), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.11.001
  18. Hazelton, J. (2019). Accounting as a human right: the case of water information, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 2(26), 267-311. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571311303738
  19. Henwood, K. L., & Pigeon, N. R. (1992). Qualitative research and psychological theorizing. British Journal of Psychology, 83(1), 97-112.
  20. Kawar, L. (2011). Finding a Place for Marginal Migrants in the International Human Rights System, Sarat, A. (Ed.) Special Issue Human Rights: New Possibilities/New Problems (Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, Vol. 56), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1059-4337(2011)‌000005‌6006
  21. Kidd, J. (2012). Commentary on “Human rights training: impact on attitudes and knowledge”, Tizard Learning Disability Review, 17(2), 88-91. https://doi.org/10.1108/13595471211218857
  22. Klein, J. (2011). The Rhetoric and Ideology of Human Rights in the Media, Papademas, D. (Ed.) Human Rights and Media (Studies in Communications, Vol. 6), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0275-7982(2011)000000‌6005
  23. Koon, V.-Y., & Fujimoto, Y. (2023). From corporate social responsibility (CSR) to corporate humanistic responsibility (CHR): the conceptualization and operationalization of perceived CHR, Personnel Review, 53(4), 877-899.https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-07-2022-0491
  24. Li, Y., & McKernan, J. (2016). Human rights, accounting, and the dialectic of equality and inequality, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(4), 568-593. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2015-2142
  25. Lopatta, K., Tideman, S. A., Scheil, C., & Makarem, N. (2023). The current state of corporate human rights disclosure of the global top 500 business enterprises: Measurement and determinants, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.‌cpa.‌2022.‌102512
  26. McDonagh, M. (2020). The Right to Information in International Human Rights Law, Human Rights Law Review, 4(3), 111-139. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngs045
  27. McIvor, L., & Chakrabortty, R. K. (2022). Multi-Criteria Decision Making in A Multi-Method Framework with Application in Capability Acquisition and Enhancement, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(10), 1816-1821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.662
  28. McPhail, K., & Ferguson, J. (2016). The past, the present and the future of accounting for human rights, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(4), 526-541. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2441
  29. Penhale, B. (2023). Human rights and older people: process and perspectives, The Journal of Adult Protection, 25(3), 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAP-04-2023-0012
  30. Pianezzi, D., & Cinquini, L. (2017). Assessing the validity of accounting for human rights: A pragmatic constructivist perspective, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 13(3), 370-391.
  31. Porumbescu, G. A., Cucciniello, M., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2020). Accounting for citizens when explaining open government effectiveness, Government Information Quarterly, 37(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101451
  32. Rogge, M. (2022). Risk, Uncertainty, and the Future of Corporate Human Rights Due Diligence. Corporate Responsibility Initiative Working Paper Series, Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business & Government, Cambridge, MA, December. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4317128
  33. Ruggie, J. G. (2007). Business and Human Rights: The Evolving International Agenda, The American Journal of International Law, 101(4), 819-840
  34. Sikka, P. (2011). Accounting for human rights: The challenge of globalization and foreign investment agreements, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22(8), 811-827 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.‌cpa.2011.03.004
  35. Speziale, H. S., Streubert, H. J., & Carpenter, D. R. (2011). Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative. Lippincott Williams &Wilkins.
  36. Suh, J. (2023). Human Rights and Corruption in Settling the Accounts of the Past: Transitional Justice Experiences from the Philippines, South Korea, and Indonesia, Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 179(1), 61-89. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-bja10049
  37. Zeng, X., Momin, M., & Nurunnabi, M. (2022). Photo disclosure in human rights issues by fortune companies: an impression management perspective, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(3), 568-599. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-06-2019-0243
  38. Aghdam-Mazreh, Y., Nikumram, H., Rahnama Rudpashti, F., & Bani-Mahed, B. (2018). Civil liberties and accounting development, Financial Accounting and Audit Research, 11(43), 27-48. https://doi.org/27-48. 20.1001.1.23830379.1398.11.43.2.1 [In Persian]
  39. Davoudi Nasr, M., Talebnia, Q., Royai, R. A., & Salehi-Amiri, S. R. (2017). Explaining the appropriate model of corporate social responsibility audit(social ethics) from the perspective of human rights and social values ​​using the exploratory factor analysis approach and structural equation modeling, Accounting Knowledge and Management Audit, 7(25), 99-122. https://journals.srbiau.ac.ir/article_11769.html [In Persian]
  40. Hosseinpouran, A., Walian, H., & Abdoli, M.R. (2023). Development of Discourse Accounting Model in the Effectiveness of Green Accounting Outcomes: Changing the Positivist Accounting Paradigm, Journal of Management Accounting, 16(56), 54-74. https://doi.org/‌10.30495/JMA.2023.22412 [In Persian]
  41. Javan, A., Babajani, J., Marfo, M., & Barzideh, F. (2023). Audit Quality: Providing a Model and Investigating the Gap between the Current Situation and the Desired Level. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 20(79), 45-84. doi: 10.22054/qjma.2022.69623.2406 [In Persian]
  42. Karami, G., Dolatzarei, E., & Faraji, O. (2022). Twenty-One Years of the Behavioral Accounting Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 19(75), 165-201. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjma.2022.67031.2364 [In Persian]
  43. Mohseni, V., Hashemi, S. M., Javaid, M. J., & Abbasi, B. (2018). Legal analysis of proportionality of the right of public access to information with the realization of citizenship rights with an emphasis on Iran's legal system, Public Law Research, 20(62), 321-354. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjpl.2019.32645.1860 [In Persian]
  44. Sarabadani-Tafarshi, H., & Peshami, A. (2016). Conceptual explanation of social justice theory in the thought of martyr Sadr, Naqd and Nazar, 22(86), 35-64. https://doi.org/10.22081/JPT.2017.64518 [In Persian]
  45. Talebi, M. H., Mohseni, M. S. (2015). the relationship between human rights and anthropology, Religious Anthropology, 13(35), 131-157. https://doi.org/10.22034/RA.2016.21960 [In Persian]
  46. Zaroudi, A. (2021). Human Rights Compliance Responsibility of Multinational Corporations in International Investments, International Legal Research, 14(53), 203-222. https://doi.org/10.30495/‌ALR.2021.678736 [In Persian]
  47. Yaqoubirad, P. (2021). Human Rights and Multinational Corporations: UN Policies and Corporate Responsibilities in Protecting Human Rights in Business, Legal Studies, 20(46), 347-369. https://doi.org/10.48300‌/JLR.2021.132625 [In Persian]