Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student of Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

2 Profesoor of accounting ,Accounting & Management Faculty,Allameh Tabatabaie university

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine financial performance measurement indicators, assess the adequacy and capability of existing indicators, and evaluate the capabilities of the accounting system to fulfill the financial responsibility of Tehran Municipality. In order to, theoretical fundamentals and the literature related to the assessment of the performance of municipalities in developed countries and relevant laws and regulations were first studied; then the indicators for this type of evaluation were determined and agreed through the use of the Fuzzy Delphi methodology and expert opinion polls. Subsequently, the "confirmatory factor analysis" test was used to determine the factor load of each component’s indicators. Additionally, the adequacy and capability of performance measurement indicators in Tehran Municipality were assessed in order to fulfill the responsibility of financial accountability by comparing the indicators of performance evaluation with the consensus indicators in a specialized community. Finally, the accounting system capabilities of Tehran Municipality were evaluated to provide the information needed. The results of the study showed that out of 50 indicators of financial performance evaluation derived from theoretical fundamentals and researches, the Delphi group obtained 41 general consensus indicators, but only 26 indicators were sufficiently important by doing a confirmatory factor analysis. On the other hand, the results of the research showed that the indicators of financial performance evaluation in Tehran's municipality are identical to half of the consensus indicators. However, the Municipality's accounting system provides a considerable part of the actual necessary information of the entity's financial performance measurement system.

Keywords

  1. ابارشی، احمد حسینی،  سید یعقوب. (1390).  مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری، تهران،  انتشارت جامعه‌شناسان، ص 21.

     احسانی فرد، علی اصغر واحسانی فرد، مهدی.(1392). «ارائه مدل راهبردی سنجش، مدیریت وارزیابی عملکردموثرشهرداریها با تلفیق دو مدل مورد پژوهش: مناطق 3 و 18 شهرداری تهران؛ EFQM و BSC »، فصلنامه مدیریت شهری، شماره 31، ص7-26.

    آخوندیان، محمدجواد. (1391). «ارزیابی نگرش مردم نسبت به میزان عملکرد مناطق مختلف شهرداری با رویکرد فازی، مطالعه موردی: منطقه 1 شهرداری ساری»، چهارمین کنفرانس برنامه‌ریزی و مدیریت شهری مشهد. ص42.

    باباجانی، جعفر. (1382). «مسئولیت پاسخگویی و تحولات حسابداری دولتی موضوع بیانیه شماره 34 (GASB)»، پژوهشنامه علوم انسانی واجتماعی ، مازندران ، شماره هشتم.

    طبرسا، غلامرضا. (1378). «بررسی و تبیین نقش اقتضائات استراتژیک در انتخاب الگوی ارزیابی عملکرد سازمانهای دولتی»، مجموعه مقالات دومین جشنواره شهید رجایی ارزیابی عملکرد دستگاه‌های اجرایی کشور، تهران: سازمان امور اداری و استخدامی کشور. سال 5، ش 14. 

    1. Ahmed M. Al-Baidhani. (2008). "The Use Of Balanced Scorecard As A Tool For Performance
    2. Management And Plannin", The German University In Cairo، 108.
    3. Bigliardi. Barbara, Ivo Dormio. Alberto, Galati. Francesco. (2011). "Balanced Scorecard For The Public Administration", Issues From A Case  study,International Journal Of Business, Management And Social Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 5, Pp. 1-16.
    4. Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants، Public Sector Accounting Board. (2004). "Performance Reporting، " available at:www.cica. ca/index. cfm/ciid/15602/la_id/1.htm
    5. Cengiz Kahraman. (2009). "Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making: Theory and Applications with Recent Developments Front Cover", Volume 16 of Springer optimization and its applications, 44
    6. Chen، N.X.، Zhang، y.j.(2009)."Principal Component Analysis of Triangular Fuzzy Number Data fuzzy", information and engineering ,vol، 2، 797-808.     
    7. Cheng, J. H. , Lee, C. M. , & Tang, C. H. (2009). "An application of fuzzy Delphi and fuzzy AHP on evaluating wafer supplier in semiconductor industry". WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, 6(5), 756-767.
    8. Fang، W. C. (2011) ."Combining the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and the fuzzy Delphi method for developing critical competences of electronic commerce professional managers", Quality & Quantity, 45 (2011) P 751-768
    9. G. H Tzeng , J. Y Teng. (1993). "Transportation investment project selection with fuzzy multiobjectives", Transportation planning and Technology,P 91-112.
    10. Halachmi, Arie .(1999). "Mandated Performance Measurement", A help or a Hindrance National Productivity review, Vol. 18, Issue 2, 59-61, ISSN: New York; spring.
    11. Hingoft, E. Laine. (2000). "New Organization Performance Test Uncover Some Surpisingrelotional Behavior", Credit Union Times, Vol. 11, Issue 3, January, West Palm Beach,3.
    12. Hsu, P. F. , & Chen, B. Y. (2007). "Developing and implementing a selection model for bedding chain retail store franchisee using Delphi and fuzzy AHP", Quality & Quantity, 41(2), 275-290.
    13. J.H Cheng, C. M Lee , C. H Tang. (2009). "An application of fuzzy Delphi and fuzzy AHP on evaluating wafer supplier in semiconductor industry", WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, (5) P 756-767.
    14. Kahraman, Cengiz. (2009). "Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making: Theory and Applications with Recent Developments Front Cover", Volume 16 of Springer optimization and its applications, ISSN 1931-6828
    15. Kyrilliodoy,M.(2004). "An overview of performance measures" ,Association of  research libraries:http:/www.arl.org.
    16. Padovani ,E. And Rossi,F. And Orelli ,R. (2010). "The Use Of Financial Indicators To DetermineFinancial Health Of Italian Municipalities", Working PapersSeries.p:21.                                                      
    17. Reymond J.(2003). "Performance measurement challenges and strategis" ,Faculty of management avd organization ,university of NY.
    18. Wu, C. H. , & Fang, W. C. (2011). "Combining the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and the fuzzy Delphi method for developing critical competences of electronic commerce professional managers". Quality & Quantity, 45(4), 751-768.