Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Accounting, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economic, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The aim of this research is to present a sustainability reporting framework for the Iranian banking industry. The research was conducted using a mixed methods approach; in the qualitative phase, the main dimensions and components were identified using data-based theory and their validity was confirmed in the Delphi round. In the quantitative phase, the relative importance of the dimensions was determined using the interpretive ranking method. The findings showed that five dimensions of governance, social, environmental, economic, and compliance and risk are considered the main pillars of banks' sustainability reporting, of which the governance dimension has the greatest impact. The compliance and risk dimension indicates the bank's level of adherence to regulations, regulatory standards, and risk management mechanisms and plays a key role in promoting transparency and stakeholder trust. The final framework includes five dimensions, ten components, and fifty conceptual propositions and can provide a valid basis for policymaking, evaluation, and development of sustainability reporting in the banking sector.

Introduction

Sustainability reporting is increasingly recognized as a key tool for transparency and accountability beyond traditional financial reporting. Existing frameworks often face implementation challenges and may not address industry-specific needs. In the banking sector, effective sustainability reporting is critical due to its central role in capital allocation and reducing information asymmetry. Institutional gaps, high disclosure costs, and limited guidance hinder consistent reporting. Therefore, tailored reporting mechanisms are needed to enhance transparency, meet stakeholder expectations, and support sustainable investment decisions. This study explores these challenges and proposes a framework for improving sustainability disclosure in banks.

Literature Review

Sustainability originates from the broader concept of sustainable development, emphasizing the balance between current resource use and the needs of future generations. Initially focused on environmental aspects, sustainability reporting has expanded to include social and economic dimensions. Existing frameworks provide guidelines for non-financial reporting, yet they often lack balance across different sustainability indicators. Voluntary disclosure may lead to selective reporting, misrepresentation, and reduced transparency. Differences between industries further challenge the uniform application of these frameworks, particularly in sectors with unique operational characteristics. In banking, non-financial disclosures such as governance, risk management, and social performance are crucial due to the sector’s role in capital allocation. Institutional gaps and the absence of industry-specific standards hinder effective sustainability reporting in banks. Integrated reporting, which combines financial and non-financial information can improve transparency and stakeholder confidence. Tailored reporting frameworks are essential to address sector-specific challenges and enhance sustainability practices. This study focuses on examining the effectiveness and implementation of sustainability reporting in the banking industry.

Methodology

This study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative analyses to examine sustainability reporting in the banking industry. The qualitative phase utilizes grounded theory, with semi-structured interviews and three-stage coding to identify key sustainability reporting criteria. Thirteen experts, including academics, banking managers, and auditors, participated until theoretical saturation was reached. The Delphi technique was then applied to validate and achieve consensus on the identified criteria, linking qualitative insights to the quantitative phase. In the quantitative stage, thirty bank managers and board members completed structured rating and pairwise comparison surveys using fuzzy linguistic scales. These data were analyzed to rank and weight the main components of sustainability reporting. Overall, the methodology integrates grounded theory, Delphi validation, and fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making to develop a robust theoretical framework for banking sustainability reporting.

Result

This study develops a tailored sustainability reporting framework for the Iranian banking industry using an integrated mixed-methods approach that combines grounded theory, Delphi validation, and interpretive ranking analysis. Through fourteen expert interviews, five overarching categories, ten core components, and fifty-two thematic propositions were identified, forming the foundational structure of the proposed framework. The Delphi process subsequently validated fifty themes, thereby reinforcing the coherence, relevance, and reliability of the extracted conceptual model. These components span human-resource capabilities, competitive and governance-related practices, social responsibility commitments, intergenerational environmental stewardship, and professional ethical obligations. In the quantitative phase, senior banking managers evaluated the relative influence of the framework’s components through structured pairwise comparisons. Results revealed that governance disclosure practices constitute the most influential and central axis of the proposed sustainability reporting framework. This includes transparent reporting of board activities, executive appointment and tenure criteria, remuneration mechanisms, and governance performance indicators. Strengthening disclosure in this dimension enhances organizational legitimacy, reinforces stakeholder trust, and improves the transparency of banking operations. Overall, the study presents a comprehensive and sector-specific framework that serves as a strategic roadmap for regulators, policymakers, and banks seeking to institutionalize sustainability reporting practices aligned with industry needs.

Discussion

This study develops a framework for sustainability reporting in the Iranian banking sector, highlighting governance as a core dimension. Detailed disclosure of board activities, remuneration policies, and decision-making processes enhances stakeholder trust and supports informed decision-making. Historically, non-financial governance information was reported symbolically, limiting transparency and accountability. The findings indicate that improved disclosure practices can strengthen internal controls and demonstrate the independence of bank boards. Governance-focused sustainability reporting also differentiates banks from competitors by signaling higher responsibility toward social, economic, and environmental interests. Implementing structured monitoring mechanisms and annual evaluation checklists can incentivize broader voluntary disclosures. Overall, the study emphasizes that robust governance reporting is essential for enhancing stakeholder confidence and promoting sustainable banking practices.

Conclusion

The study confirms that tailored sustainability reporting frameworks are crucial for the banking sector. Enhanced governance disclosure enables banks to build trust, improve transparency, and support stakeholder decision-making. Regulatory adjustments and policy interventions are necessary to encourage comprehensive voluntary reporting. Proper implementation can strengthen banks’ competitive positions while contributing to overall sustainable development. Ultimately, banks that prioritize sustainability reporting play a key role in guiding society toward broader sustainable outcomes.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Afolabi, H., Ram, R., & Rimmel, G. (2023). Influence and behaviour of the new standard setters in the sustainability reporting arena: implications for the Global Reporting Initiative’s current position. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(4), 743-775. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-01-2022-0052
  2. Alvareza, I. G., & Ortas, E. (2017). Corporate Environmental Sustainability Reporting in the Context of National Cultures: A Quantile Regression Approach. International Business Review, 26(2), 337-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.09.003
  3. Baldissera, A. (2023). Sustainability reporting in banks: History of studies and a conceptual framework for thinking about the future by learning from the past. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management, 30(5), 2385-2405. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2491
  4. Bohn, L., Macagnan, C.B., & Kronbauer, C.A. (2025). Navigating legitimacy: diverse stakeholder perspectives on the IFRS Foundation’s establishment of the ISSB. Meditari Accountancy Research, 33(1), 86-113. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-11-2023-2235
  5. Christensen, H., Hales, J., O'Dwyer, B., & Peecher, M. E. (2024). Accounting for sustainability and climate change: Special section overview. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 113(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2024.101568
  6. Davey, K., Entwistle, G., & Faye, C. (2025). Sustainability Reporting in the Banking Industry: Examining the Extent of Assurance. Journal of Accounting. Ethics & Public Policy, Journal of Accounting, Ethics & Public Policy, 26(1), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.60154/jaepp.2025.v26n1p27
  7. De Villiers, C., La Torre, M., & Molinari, M. (2022). The Global Reporting Initiative’s (GRI) past, present and future: critical reflections and a research agenda on sustainability reporting (standard-setting). Pacific Accounting Review, 34(5), 728-747. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-02-2022-0034
  8. Glaser, B. G. (1992). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, Calif.: Sociology Press.
  9. Gulko, N., Gerardou, F.S., & Withanage, N. (2024). The Concept of Materiality in CSR and SDGs Reporting: Definitions, Interpretation, Application, and Sustainable Value Creation, Hunjra, A.I. and Hussainey. K. (Ed.) The Emerald Handbook of Ethical Finance and Corporate Social Responsibility, Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80455-406-720241001
  10. Gupta, M. (2025). Is sustainability reporting a way forward? Evidence from banking industry. Meditari Accountancy Research, 33(1), 53-85. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-03-2024-2408
  11. Gupta, M. (2025). Unveiling the impact of sustainability reporting on banking performance: Role of country-specific determinants. Journal of Economics and Business, 4(4), 64-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2025.106246
  12. Hedley, T., Porco, B., Keiningham, T.L., Aksoy, L., Statuto, L.A., & Amin, M. (2024). Beyond apples and oranges: unraveling the complexity in corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Service Management, 35(4), 512-524. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-12-2023-0505
  13. Jonsen, K., & Jehn, K.A. (2009). Using triangulation to validate themes in qualitative studies. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 4(2), 123-150. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465640910978391
  14. Khan, I., Fujimoto, Y., Uddin, M.J., & Afridi, M.A. (2023). Evaluating sustainability reporting on GRI standards in developing countries: a case of Pakistan. International Journal of Law and Management, 65(3), 189-208. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-01-2022-0016
  15. Lin, S.H., & Chen, G.-Z. (2025). Frequency of interim financial reporting and investment efficiency. Managerial Finance, 52(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-06-2024-0439
  16. Lu, W. (2016). An Exploration of the Associations among Corporate Sustainability Performance, Corporate Governance, and Corporate Financial Performanc [Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas], University of Texas, Available at: https://rc.library.uta.edu/uta
  17. Luque-Vílchez, M., Cordazzo, M., Rimmel, G., & Tilt, C.A. (2023). Key aspects of sustainability reporting quality and the future of GRI, Sustainability Accounting. Management and Policy Journal, 14(4), 637-659. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2023-0127
  18. Mhatre, T.N., Thakkar, J.J., & Maiti, J. (2017). Modelling critical risk factors for Indian construction project using interpretive ranking process (IRP) and system dynamics (SD). International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 34(9), 1451-1473. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-09-2015-0140
  19. Millar, J., & Slack, R. (2024). Global investor responses to the International Sustainability Standards Board draft sustainability and climate-change standards: sites of dissonance or consensus, Sustainability Accounting. Management and Policy Journal, 15(3), 573-604. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2023-0128
  20. Moufty, S., Al-Najjar, B., & Ibrahim, A. (2024). Communications of sustainability practices in the banking sector: Evidence from cross-country analysis. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 29(1), 135-161. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2679
  21. Narkhede, B.E., Raut, R., Gardas, B., Luong, H.T., & Jha, M. (2017). Selection and evaluation of third party logistics service provider (3PLSP) by using an interpretive ranking process (IRP). Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(6), 1597-1648. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2016-0055
  22. Rahmani, A., & Mahmoudkhani, M. (2022). The necessity of preparing and assuring sustainability reports: The views of insurance industry experts and auditors. Professional Auditing Research, 2(5), 128-156. doi: 10.22034/jpar.2022.550623.1082
  23. Raza, A., Alavi, A.B., & Asif, L. (2024). Sustainability and financial performance in the banking industry of the United Arab Emirates. Discover Sustainability, 5(3), 223-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00414-z
  24. Scheibelhofer, E. (2023). The Interpretive Interview. An Interview Form Centring on Research Participants’ Constructions. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 4(1), 56-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231168748
  25. Sebastião, A. M., Tavares, M. C., & Azevedo, G. (2024). Evolution and Challenges of Sustainability Reporting in the Banking Sector: A Systematic Literature Review. Administrative Sciences, 14(12), 333-355. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14120333
  26. Sharma, D., & Kumar, P. (2024). Prioritizing the attributes of sustainable banking performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73(6), 1797-1825. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-11-2022-0600
  27. Abdi, M., Kordestani, Gh., & Rezazadeh, J. (2019). Sustainability Reporting: Ranking Drivers and Indicators. Accounting Research, 10(2), 71-114. Doi: 10.22051/jera.2019.25698.2404 [In Persian]
  28. Ahmadzade, Y., Maranjory, M., Alikhani, R., & Taghipouryan., Y. (2022) Providing a Sustainability Reporting Framework based on Balancing Stakeholder Expectations and Company Capacity. Financial Accounting and Auditing Research,14(56), 161-189. Doi: 161-190. 10.30495/faar.2022.698385 [In Persian]
  29. Goran, F. (1403). A comprehensive review of recent developments and innovations in financial accounting and its impact on financial reporting, Journal of Research in Accounting and Economic Sciences, 8(32), 9-16. https://shij.ir/jares/upload/jares/Content/040114_16/02-Jares-No32-99535 [In Persian]
  30. Haghighat, T., & Hekmat, H. (2025). An overview of the progress and challenges of sustainability reporting in Iran. Accounting and Corporate Governance Researches, 3(7), 1-15. Doi: 10.71600/jacgr.2024.1128420 [In Persian]
  31. Hassani Moghadam, S., Mohtadi, M., Bazargani, H., Taheri, A., & Miri, M. (2023). Identification and interpretive ranking of factors affecting the improvement of agility in business process management. Decision Making and Operations Research, 8(4), 993-1014. Doi: 10.22105/dmor.2023.381281.1706 [In Persian]
  32. Hosseini, S., Ahmadi, Sh., & Silspour, H. (2014). Investigating the impact of corporate governance structures on the acceptance, amount and quality of sustainability reports: Application of a systematic review method. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 21(84), 41-97. Doi: 10.22054/qjma.2024.79513.2564 [In Persian]
  33. Kalantari, M., Valian, H., Abdoli, M., & Shahri, M. (2023). Content Framework of Creative Accounting Stimuli based on Rapidminer Clustering Technique: Implementation of Hartigan-Wong Algorithm. Empirical Research in Accounting, 13(4), 245-276. Doi: 10.22051/jera.2023.43032.3108 [In Persian]
  34. Kassiri,H., Bahiraie,A., & Golli, A. (2024). A framework for integrated reporting in Iran's banking industry. Quarterly Studies in Banking Management and Islamic Banking, 10(26), 82-129. Doi: 10.22034/jifb.2024.440683.1554 [In Persian]
  35. Mir-Emadi, S.A.A., Rezazadeh, J., & Khodarahmi, B. (2014). Reporting Pattern of Operating Departments in the Iranian Banking Industry, Journal of Financial Accounting and Auditing Research, 14(53), 103-134. Doi: 10.30495/faar.2022.691689 [In Persian]
  36. Mombeni, P., Khodadadi, V., Mahmoodi, A., Jorjorzadeh, A., & Kaabomeir, A. (2023). Evaluation of Sustainable Reporting Functions under the Dimensions of Holographic Structures of Capital Market Companies. Journal of Development and Capital, 8(2), 169-196. Doi: 10.22103/jdc.2022.20420.1310 [In Persian]
  37. Rahmani, Ali and Mahmoudkhani, Mahnaz. (2017). The necessity of preparing and providing assurance on sustainability reports: The perspective of auditors and insurance industry experts. Professional Auditing Research, 2(5), 128-156. Doi: 10.22034/jpar.2022.550623.1082
  38. Samani Malayeri, S., Hemmatfar, M., & Karami, Gh. (2014). Identifying the drivers (motives) of sustainability reporting in the Iranian banking industry. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 15(4), 115-132. Doi: 10.22103/jak.2024.23108.4026 [In Persian]
  39. Shekarkhah, J. (2025). Investigating the Impact of Sustainability Reporting on Financial Performance: A Systematic Review. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 22(88). Doi: 10.22054/qjma.2025.87299.2697 [In Persian]
  40. Yousefizadeh, S., & Fakhari, H. (2014). Corporate characteristics that determine sustainability reporting. Accounting Research, 14(4), 149-184. Doi: 10.22051/jera.2024.47392.3254 [In Persian]
  41. Zia, F., Vakili Fard, H. R., & Saraf, F. (2020) The Effect of Sustainability Reporting on Reducing Information Asymmetry of Companies Listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Management Accounting, 13(46), 121-135. https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/jma/Article/816752 [In Persian]