Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD student, Department of Accounting, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Accounting, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran

4 Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, Bandargaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandargaz, Iran

10.22054/qjma.2025.83142.2642

Abstract

This study attempts to create a management accounting framework using a Six Sigma approach and evaluate the identified dimensions. The method used in this research is grounded theory in the qualitative phase and an evaluation of the identified dimensions in the quantitative phase. The study's data collection was conducted over a period of 6 months, and the tools used were interviews and questionnaires. In the first stage of the study, scholars in the field of management accounting participated through interviews. In the next stage, specialized members from companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange commented on the evaluation of the identified dimensions. The results of the qualitative section led to the development of an octagonal theoretical framework that interprets the central phenomenon of the study. In the second phase, the most central criterion identified—profit analysis—was selected. The results obtained can enhance the analytical depth of corporate accountability functions to stakeholders.
Introduction
Accounting is a changing phenomenon, where both management accounting and financial accounting activities, applied sciences, and concepts are continuously evolving and redefining themselves, increasingly converging into interconnected realities. Modern organizations are becoming more complex due to rapidly changing and highly competitive environments. Globalization, economic liberalization, technological advancements, and interconnectivity have made the survival of organizations more challenging than ever before. Markets are becoming more international, dynamic, and customer-driven. Customers are demanding more variety, better quality, and improved service, including greater reliability and faster delivery. Changes in the business environment emphasize the need for complete, transparent, reliable, and accurate information that can be accessed quickly. In this context, organizations must respond more innovatively in management accounting. It should aim at value creation and at developing and sustaining competitive advantages. Furthermore, current resource planning and computer-assisted design and manufacturing have cast doubt on the effectiveness of traditional management accounting techniques.
 

Literature Review

The evolution of management accounting practices can be traced through various stages, each characterized by distinct paradigms, methodologies, and theoretical frameworks. Early research in management accounting predominantly emphasized cost-based approaches such as standard costing, budgeting, and variance analysis. However, the limitations of these traditional techniques in capturing non-financial performance metrics and supporting strategic decision-making led to the emergence of new management accounting practices. The evolution of management accounting reflects the dynamic nature of modern business environments, characterized by increased complexity, uncertainty, and globalization. Organizations are continuously seeking innovative ways to adapt their management accounting systems to meet the changing needs of internal and external stakeholders. This underscores the importance of understanding how management accounting practices have evolved over time and the factors driving these changes.

Methodology

This study is categorized as a two-phase research project supported by an exploratory methodology. In this process, grounded theory is used to identify the criteria of the central phenomenon. Then, in the second phase of the study, a questionnaire is employed to assess the dimensions of the identified phenomenon. This approach enables the research to construct a strategic map within the company, through which managers, using technical and strategic models, can more effectively achieve sustainability.
 

Result

The results of the qualitative phase led to the creation of an octagonal theoretical framework that interprets the central phenomenon of the study. In the second phase, the most central criterion identified—the profit analysis criterion—was selected. The results contribute to enhancing the analytical depth of corporate accountability functions toward stakeholders.
 

Discussion

The findings suggest that management accounting has evolved from a focus on cost determination to a more strategic and holistic approach aimed at supporting organizational objectives. However, the review also identifies several areas for further research and exploration. Future studies may delve deeper into emerging trends such as digitalization, sustainability accounting, and the integration of financial and non-financial performance metrics. Additionally, there is a need for research examining the implications of management accounting practices on organizational performance, decision-making processes, and stakeholder relationships. By addressing these research gaps, scholars can contribute to advancing knowledge and informing practice in the field of management accounting, ultimately enhancing organizational effectiveness and competitiveness in today's dynamic business environment.
 

Conclusion

The recent trend in management accounting has shifted from history-based, temporary planning and control to future-oriented strategic planning and control. The evolution of management accounting is driven by the pressures of increasingly intense competition, technological advancements, the dominance of financial accounting, and the expanding role of management accounting. Information technology can facilitate, catalyze, motivate, or even reshape the convergence of management accounting with financial accounting, both within the technical and technological domains, as well as in behavioral and organizational contexts.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Abdelhalim, A.M. (2024). How management accounting practices integrate with big data analytics and its impact on corporate sustainability. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 22(2), 416-432. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌JFRA-01-2023-0053
  2. Altuğ, M. (2023). Application of six sigma through deep learning in the production of fasteners. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 14(7), 1376-1402. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌IJLSS-08-2022-0191
  3. Antony, J., Snee, R., & Hoerl, R. (2017). Lean Six Sigma: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 34(7), 1073–1093. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌IJQRM-03-2016-0035
  4. Araman, H., & Saleh, Y. (2023). A case study on implementing Lean Six Sigma: DMAIC methodology in aluminum profiles extrusion process. The TQM Journal, 35(2), 337-365. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌TQM-05-2021-0154
  5. Bhat, S., Antony, J., Maalouf, M., E.V., G., & Salah, S. (2024). Applications of six sigma for service quality enhancement in the UAE: a multiple case study analysis and lessons learned. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 14(7), 1492-1517. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌IJLSS-06-2022-0144
  6. Brewer, P. C., & Eighme, J. E. (2005). Using six sigma to improve the finance function: Here are some tips for success. Strategic Finance, 86(11), 27–33.
  7. Brewer, P., & Bagranoff, N. (2004). Near zero-defect accounting with Six Sigma. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 15(2), 67–70. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1002/‌jcaf.10235
  8. Crowdle, M.M., McDermott, O., & Trubetskaya, A. (2023). A benefit costing process for Lean Six Sigma programs, The TQM Journal, 35(9), 369-387. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌TQM-06-2023-0194
  9. Edirisinghe, U.C., Hossain, M.M., & Alam, M. (2024). Managerial conception of integrating sustainability into management control systems: evidence from Sri Lankan manufacturing companies, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 21(2), 105-139. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌QRAM-05-2023-0093
  10. Foster, S. Jr. (2007). Does Six Sigma Improve Performance?. The Quality Management Journal, 14(4), 7–19. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1080/‌10686967.2007.11918043
  11. Gera, R., Mittal, S., Batra, D. K., & Prasad, B. (2017). Evaluating the effects of service quality, customer satisfaction, and service value on behavioral intentions with life insurance customers in India. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, 8(3), 1–20. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.4018/‌IJSSMET.2017070101
  12. Golnam, A., Regev, G., Ramboz, J., Laprade, P., & Wegmann, A. (2012). Aligning value and implementation in service design: A systemic approach. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, 3(1), 19-36. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.4018/‌jssmet.2012010102
  13. Hussinki, H., King, T., Dumay, J., & Steinhöfel, E. (2024). Accounting for intangibles: a critical review. Journal of Accounting Literature, 47(5), 27-51. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌JAL-05-2022-0060
  14. Jirasukprasert, P., Arturo Garza-Reyes, J., Kumar, V., & K. Lim, M. (2014). A Six Sigma and DMAIC application for the reduction of defects in a rubber gloves manufacturing process. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 5(1), 2-21. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌IJLSS-03-2013-0020
  15. Kwakye, T.O., & Ahmed, K. (2023). Business strategy and the cost of equity: the mediating role of accounting information quality. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 25(3), 476-499. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌JAAR-05-2022-0120
  16. Madhani, P. M. (2021). Lean Six Sigma in Finance and Accounting Services for Enhancing Business Performance. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, 12(6), 141-165. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.4018/‌IJSSMET.2021110109
  17. McInerney, D. (2006). Slashing product development time in financial service. Six Sigma Magazine, 3(2), 1-3.
  18. Mhatre, T.N., Thakkar, J.J., & Maiti, J. (2017). Modelling critical risk factors for Indian construction project using interpretive ranking process (IRP) and system dynamics (SD). International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 34(9), 1451-1473. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌IJQRM-09-2015-0140
  19. Narkhede, B.E., Raut, R., Gardas, B., Luong, H.T., & Jha, M. (2017). Selection and evaluation of third party logistics service provider (3PLSP) by using an interpretive ranking process (IRP). Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(6), 1597-1648. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌BIJ-04-2016-0055
  20. Nicolò, G., Zampone, G., Sannino, G., & Polcini, P.T. (2024). Sustainable development goals disclosure and analyst forecast quality. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 26(6), 1-25. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌JAAR-07-2023-0223
  21. Patel, A.S., & Patel, K.M. (2024). Study on Lean Six Sigma methodology from the Indian context: an investigation of literature. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 15(7), 1435-1493. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌IJLSS-11-2021-0199
  22. Prashar, A. (2014). Adoption of Six Sigma DMAIC to reduce cost of poor quality. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(1), 103-126. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌IJPPM-01-2013-0018
  23. Raja Sreedharan, V., & Raju, R. (2016). A systematic literature review of Lean Six Sigma in different industries. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 7(4), 430-466. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌IJLSS-12-2015-0050
  24. Sahoo, P.S.B.B., & Thakur, V. (2023). The factors obstructing the blockchain adoption in supply chain finance: a hybrid fuzzy DELPHI-AHP-DEMATEL approach. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 41(9), 2292-2310. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌IJQRM-06-2022-0198
  25. Sánchez-Rebull, M.-V., Ferrer-Rullan, R., Hernández-Lara, A.-B., & Niñerola, A. (2020). Six Sigma for improving cash flow deficit: a case study in the food can manufacturing industry. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 11(6), 1105-1126. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌IJLSS-12-2018-0137
  26. Sualeh Khattak, M., Wu, Q., Ahmad, M., & Ullah, R. (2024). The role of managerial competencies in managing resources for sustainable development strategy in SMEs. Social Responsibility Journal, 20(7), 1317-1344. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌SRJ-11-2023-0634
  27. Thoa, D.T.K., & Nhi, V.V. (2022). Improving the quality of the financial accounting information through strengthening of the financial autonomy at public organizations. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 29(1), 66-82. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌JABES-06-2020-0059
  28. Vashishth, A., Lameijer, B.A., Chakraborty, A., Antony, J., & Moormann, J. (2024). Implementing Lean Six Sigma in financial services: the effect of motivations, selected methods and challenges on LSS program and organizational performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 41(2), 509-531. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌IJQRM-05-2022-0154
  29. Yu, J., & Zhu, L. (2023). Opportunities and Challenges of Financial Accounting in the Era of Big Data, Highlights in Business Economics and Management, 10(2), 464-468. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.54097/‌hbem.v10i.8140
  30. asani Moghadam, S., Mohtadi, M. M., Bazargani, H., Taheri, A., & Miri, M. (2023). Identification and interpretive ranking of factors affecting the improvement of agility in business process management. Journal of Decisions and Operations Research8(4), 993-1014. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.22105/‌dmor.2023.381281.1706 [In Persian]
  31. Hosseini, S. A., Ahmadi, S., & Seilsepoor, H. (2024). Investigating the Impact of Corporate Governance Structures on the Adoption, Quantity, and Quality of Sustainability Reports: A Systematic Review. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting21(84), 41-97. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.22054/‌qjma.2024.79513.2564 [In Persian]
  32. Khodayari, H., Maleki Oskuie, M., Moslemi, A., & Hemmati, H. (2024). Perspectives on Sustainability in Strategic Management Accounting in Terms of Financial Technologies (FinTech). Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting21(83), 163-212. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.22054/‌qjma.2024.79325.2557 [In Persian]
  33. Mirghafoori, S. H. A., Asadian Ardakani, F., & Sadeqi Arani, Z. (2011). Designing an Integrative Modeian]l for Evaluation and Selection of Six Sigma Projects Using Artificial Neural Networks. Research in Production and Operations Management, 2(2), 37-54. https:/‌/‌jpom.ui.ac.ir/‌article_19773.html?lang=en [In Persian]
  34. Sabzalipour, F., Sayadisoumar, A., Shahmohammadi, Sh., & Fazali, Z. (2023). Investigating the role of strategic orientation dimensions in the effectiveness of management accounting techniques on corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Accounting, 16(57), 92-109. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.30495/‌jma.2023.22625 [In Persian]