Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1 Assistant Professor in Accounting, Department of Accounting, Hashtrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hashtrood, Iran.
2 Asistance Prof in Accounting, Department of accounting, Hashtrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hashtrood, Iran
Abstract
Today, information competition space, as an external importance mechanism, affects the company's management system and stable performance and government ownership in both complementary and destructive aspects can affect this impact. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of government ownership on the relationship between information competition and Earning persistenceof companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange.The statistical sample of the research includes 103 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange for the period 2013 to 2020. In terms of purpose, the present study is an applied research using a post-event approach. For panel data, fixed-effect and random-effect models were used to estimate the research model using Eviews-8 software. The research results showed that information competition based on political relations and centralized institutional ownership increases Earning persistence and the interactive effect of government ownership with information competition further increases Earning persistence. That is, Government ownership and information competition are two complementary factors in achieving the goals of stakeholders.
Keywords
- Information Competition
- Earning persistence
- Government Ownership
- Institutional ownership
- political communication
Main Subjects
- Abdoh, H., & Varela, O. (2017). Product market competition, idiosyncratic and systematic volatility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 43, 500-513.
- Abramov, A., Radygin, A., Entov, R., & Chernova, M. (2017). State ownership and efficiency characteristics. Russian Journal of Economics, 3(2), 129-157.
- Adhikari, A., Derashid, C., & Zhang, H. (2006). Public policy, political connections, and effective tax rates: Longitudinal evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Public policy, 25(5), 574-595.
- Akins, B. K., Ng, J., & Verdi, R. S. (2012). Investor competition over information and the pricing of information asymmetry. The Accounting Review, 87(1), 35-58.
- Alhadab, , Abdullatif, A., Ahmed, A.H., Tahat, Y., & Mansour, I. (2021). Political connections, government ownership, and earnings management: evidence from Jordan, International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation. 17(1-2), 1-27.
- Ammann, M., Oesch, D., & Schmid, M. M. (2013). Product market competition, corporate governance, and firm value: Evidence from the EU area. European Financial Management, 19(3), 452-469.
- Bai, C. E., Liu, Q., Lu, J., Song, F. M., & Zhang, J. (2004). Corporate governance and market valuation in China. Journal of comparative economics, 32(4), 599-616.
- Beiner, S., Schmid, M. M., & Wanzenried, G. (2011). Product market competition, managerial incentives and firm valuation. European Financial Management, 17(2), 331-366.
- Chaney, P. K., Faccio, M., & Parsley, D. (2011). The quality of accounting information in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(1-2), 58-76.
- Chang, R., Firth, M. & Kim, J.B. (2002), Institutional monitoring and opportunistic earnings management, Journal of Corporate Finance, 8, 29-48.
- Cheng, P., Man, P., & Yi, C. H. (2013). The impact of product market competition on earnings quality. Accounting & Finance, 53(1), 137-162.
- Cull, R., Li, W., Sun, B. & Xu, L.C. (2015), Government connections and financial constraints: evidence from a large representative sample of Chinese firms, Journal of Corporate Finance, 32, 271-294.
- Cull, R., & Xu, L. C. (2005). Institutions, ownership, and finance: the determinants of profit reinvestment among Chinese firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 77(1), 117-146.
- Datta, S., Iskandar-Datta, M., & Singh, V. (2013). Product market power, industry structure, and corporate earnings management. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(8), 3273-3285.
- Elyasiani, E. & J. Jia. (2008). Institutional ownership stability and BHC performance, Journal of Banking and Finance, 32, 1767–1781.
- Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96 (1), 369-386.
- Faccio, M. (2010). Differences between politically-connected and non-connected firms: a cross country analysis, Financial Management, 39 (3), 905-928.
- Fosu, S. (2013). Capital structure, product market competition and firm performance: Evidence from South Africa. The quarterly review of economics and finance, 53(2), 140-151.
- Gong &, Y & Choi, S.U. (2021). State Ownership and Accounting Quality: Evidence from State-Owned Enterprises in China. Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability,13(15), 1-17.
- Guedhami, O., Pittman, J., & Saffar, W. (2014). Auditor choice in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(1), 107–162.
- Haji ghadirzade M., Garkaz, M., & Mehrazin A. (2012). Ownership structure and Information asymmetry. Economics and Finance Review, 2 (5), 62 – 70.
- Houston, J. F., Jiang, L., Lin, C., & Ma, Y. (2014). Political connections and the cost of bank loans. Journal of Accounting Research, 52 (1), 193-243.
- Hu, G. Wang, Y. (2018). Political connections and stock price crash risk: The role of intermediary information disclosure. China Finance Review International, 8 (2), 140-157.
- Joo, H. Y., & Suh, H. (2017). The Effects of Government Support on Corporate Performance Hedging against International Environmental Regulation. Sustainability, 9(11), 1980.
- Karuna, C. (2008). Industry product market competition and corporate governance. Available at SSRN
- Koch, A. S., & Park, J. C. (2011). Consistent earnings growth and the credibility of management forecasts. Available at SSRN
- Khan, A., Mihret, D.G., & Muttakin, M.B.. (2016). Corporate political connections, agency costs and audit quality. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 24 (4), 357 – 374.
- Liu, L., Qu, W., & Haman, J. (2018). Product market competition, state-ownership, corporate governance and firm performance. Asian Review of Accounting, 26(1), 62-83.
- Lu, Y. (2011). Political connections and trade expansion: Evidence from Chinese private firms. Economics of Transition, 19(2), 231-254.
- Markarian, G., & Santalo, J. (2014). Product market competition, information and earnings management. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 41(5-6), 572-599.
- Monem, R., Farshadfar, Sh. (2007). Has earnings quality declined over time? Australian evidence. online. ssrn.com
- Phi, N. T. M., Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., Chuc, A. T., Yoshino, N., & Kim, C. J. (2019). Performance Differential Between Private and State-Owned Enterprises: An Analysis of Profitability and Leverage, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 57(14), 3913-3928.
- Ruan, W., Tian, G., & Ma, S. (2011). Managerial ownership, capital structure and firm value: Evidence from China’s civilian-run firms. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 5(3), 73-92.
- Songling, Y., Ishtiaq, M., Anwar, M., & Ahmed, H. (2018). The role of government support in sustainable competitive position and firm performance. Sustainability, 10(10), 3495.
- Su, D., & He, X. (2012). Ownership structure, corporate governance and productive efficiency in China. Journal of productivity analysis, 38(3), 303-318.
- Tian, L., & Estrin, S. (2008). Retained state shareholding in Chinese PLCs: does government ownership always reduce corporate value?. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36(1), 74-89.
- You, J., & Du, G. (2012). Are political connections a blessing or a curse? Evidence from CEO turnover in China. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(2), 179-194.
- Allah Bakhshi, S., Piri, P., & Heidari, M. (2019). The Effects of Ownership Structure (Governmental and private) on Relationship between Disclosure Quality and Cost of Capital at Tehran Stock Exchange Listed Companies. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 16(62), 21-43. [In Persian]
- Didar, H., Mansorfar, G., & Rahmani, J. (2018). The Relationship Between Cross Ownership and Efficiency in Firms Listed on Tehran Stock Exchange with the Impact of Intermediary Variable Product Market Competition. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 15(58), 137-159. [In Persian]
- Ghasemiyeh, R., Ghayori Moghadam, A., & Hajeb, H. (2015). The Effect of Competition in Product Market on the Degree of Relationship between Capital Structure and Business Enterprise Performance. Journal of Accounting Advances, 6(2), 107-129. [In Persian]
- Habibzadeh Baygi, S., & Darabi, R. (2016). The Role of Government Ownership on the Financial and Economic Measures of Firm Performance Using Fuzzy Regression. Journal of Governmental Accounting, 3(1), 9-20. [In Persian]
- Hosseini Rad, S., Razaee, G., Mohsenifard, G., & Khajavi, S. (2014). The Impact of Product Market Competition on Earnings Management of the Companies Listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Asset Management and Financing, 1(3), 119-134. [In Persian]
- Kordestani, G. (2013). Competition between Informed Investors over Information and the Pricing of Information Asymmetry. Journal of Asset Management and Financing, 1(2), 127-144. [In Persian]
- Moradi, M., Khoskar, F., & Samkan, Z. (2020). Government relations and profitability stability of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Accounting and Management Vision, 3(26), 75-91. [In Persian]
- Rezaei, F., & Weysihesar, S. (2014). The effect of political connections with the government on the relationship between ownership concentration with quality of financial reporting and the cost of equity capital. Accounting and Auditing Review, 21(4), 449-470. [In Persian]
- Salehnezhad, H., Vaghfi, H., Sadeghian, B., & Ahangary, M. (2015). The Relation between Stock Price Response and Sustained Earnings Growth. Empirical Research in Accounting, 5(2), 51-70. [In Persian]
- Shamsaddini, K., & Nemati, M. (2021). The Relationship between Institutional Ownership Stability and Earnings Management in terms of Corporate Financial Leverage. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 12(4), 1-24. [In Persian]