shokrollah khajavi; Hashem Nasirifar; Mohammad-Hossein Ghadirian-Arani
Abstract
Due to the benefits of political connections and the lower necessity of responding to market pressures to increase information quality by politically connected firms, it is expected that these firms will provide low-quality accounting information. With respect to the extended role of government in the ...
Read More
Due to the benefits of political connections and the lower necessity of responding to market pressures to increase information quality by politically connected firms, it is expected that these firms will provide low-quality accounting information. With respect to the extended role of government in the economy of Iran, this study aims to investigate the impact of political connections on the accounting information quality of the firms listed in the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). The statistical sample includes 101 listed firms over the 2010-2018 period. Financial restatement and the intensity of financial restatement are used as indicators of the low quality of accounting information. To achieve the research objectives, two hypotheses have been proposed, and to test the hypotheses, the logistic regression and the multiple linear regression analysis in a panel data model were conducted. The results show that political connections have a positive effect on the occurrence and the intensity of financial restatement. Therefore, it seems that the firms' accounting information quality is affected by their political connections.
Zohreh Arefmanesh; Mohammad-Hossein Ghadirian-Arani; Zohreh Ghadirian Arani
Abstract
The main purpose of this study is to investigation the relationship between financial distress and restatement of financial statement for listed companies on the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). Consequently, in this study a sample of 107 nonfinancial listed companies on the TSE from 2010 to 2016 were investigated. ...
Read More
The main purpose of this study is to investigation the relationship between financial distress and restatement of financial statement for listed companies on the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). Consequently, in this study a sample of 107 nonfinancial listed companies on the TSE from 2010 to 2016 were investigated. Emerging Market Scoring (EMS) model was used for determining the financial distress and bankruptcy risk. In conducting this study, two main hypotheses were proposed. Comparison of means tests (t-test) and multiple linear regression analysis on panel data were used to test these hypotheses. The research results showed that there is no significant difference between the magnitude of financial restatement in financially distressed and non-distressed companies. However, bankruptcy risk is positively related to magnitude of financial restatement. That is, the more the bankruptcy risk, the more magnitude of financial restatement.
Hassan Farajzadeh Dehkordi; Leila Aghaei
Volume 12, Issue 45 , April 2015, , Pages 97-114
Abstract
This paper investigates the relation between fraudulent financialreporting and firms’ dividend policies. Specifically, this researchconcentrated on situations that it is possible to classify financialrestatement into fraudulent and non-fraudulent based on themanagement’s incentives for discretionary ...
Read More
This paper investigates the relation between fraudulent financialreporting and firms’ dividend policies. Specifically, this researchconcentrated on situations that it is possible to classify financialrestatement into fraudulent and non-fraudulent based on themanagement’s incentives for discretionary accounting choices .The data is related to 247 firms (consisted of 2,238 firm-yearobservation) during 1381-1390. A Meet-or-beat model was used toclassify firms as making discretionary accounting choices foropportunistic meet-or-beat. Furthermore, a fixed effects logisticregression with panel data was used to test hypothesis. Results showthat dividend-paying firms have less likelihood to engage infraudulent financial reporting furthermore, the negative associationbetween dividend paying status and fraudulent financial reporting isstronger when the size of dividend payouts is larger .Overall, resultssuggest firm’s dividend policy is indicative of its earnings quality.Specifically, dividend policy unfolds the manager’s incentives forfinancial restatements.
Abstract
While perior studies faild to document a meaningful relationship between financial restatement, as a measure of earnings quality, and firms’ dividend paying policy, the purpose of the present study is to reinvestigate this relationship by classifying financial restatements into opportunistic and ...
Read More
While perior studies faild to document a meaningful relationship between financial restatement, as a measure of earnings quality, and firms’ dividend paying policy, the purpose of the present study is to reinvestigate this relationship by classifying financial restatements into opportunistic and non-opportunistic based on management incentives in using discretionary accruals. The data is related to 247 firms (consisted of 2,238 firm-year observations) during 1381-1390. A Meet-or-beat model was applied to determine opportunistic financial reporting. Furthermore, a fixed effects logistic regression with panel data was used to test hypothesis. Results show that dividend-paying firms have less likelihood to engage in opportunistic financial reporting through fincial restatements. Furthermore, the negative association between dividend paying status and opportunistic financial reporting is stronger when the size of dividend payouts are larger. Overall, results suggest firm’s dividend policy is indicative of its earnings quality. Specifically, dividend policy unfolds the manager’s incentives behind the financial restatements.
