Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting

Abstract Interest groups, especially shareholders have demand for Disclosure and Reporting in the capital market and they change their expectations of risk and return based on disclosure of information. Therefore, disclosure has economic consequence for companies that according to the empirical literature, cost of capital, information asymmetry and stock liquidity, there are three important consequences of disclosure and reporting. One of the disclosures of companies is risk disclosure in the capital market, especially for banks and financial and credit institutions which it require in the form of financial statements and the Report of the Board to the Stock Forum based on complies with the regulations of the Stock Exchange and the Central Bank of Iran. In this paper, we survey the effect of risk disclosure in bank listed in stock market on cost of capital, information asymmetry and stock liquidity as three important of risk disclosure consequences. For this aim, by using the annual data of 18 banks listed in Tehran Stock Exchange during the years 1390 to 1395 we estimate simple regression with panel data. The results show the main hypothesis (there is a consequential risk disclosure of the banks listed in the stock market), confirms. In addition, risk disclosure has a positive and significant relationship with cost of capital and information asymmetry, but there is no significant relationship between risk disclosure and stock liquidity.

Abstract An extensive literature examines managers’ incentives to smooth reported earnings using accruals in order to reduce price fluctuation of stocks in markets. Banks have additional incentives to engage in earnings management for a number of reasons, including tighter regulatory environment. They also have the ability to manage earnings using loan loss provisions (LLP). This paper examines earnings management using accruals – in particular, LLP - as the main accrual item in financial reporting of banks in the Iranian banking industry from 2005 to 2016. From previous studies, we expect that for banks with good (poor) current performance and expected poor (good) future performance, managers will save income for (borrow income from) the future by reducing (increasing) current income through LLP, especially discretionary LLP (DLLP). We also examine the effect of external financing, availability of other methods of earnings management like increasing (decreasing) non-operating income and capital requirements and also the relation of DLLP with risk. Our results indicate that bank managers do save earnings through DLLP in good times and borrow earnings using DLLP in bad times. We also find that bank risk is negatively associated with discretionary accruals.
 

Abstract One of the essential needs of Iranian financial market participants (including money market and capital market participants) is rating Iranian banks based on their financial strength. This rating helps stakeholders, including shareholders, investors, customers, central bank and etc., to obtain more accurate information regarding inherent safety and soundness of Iranian banks. The aim of this study is rating Iranian banks, based on financial strength, specifically those listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE) and Iran OTC market. All the banks were separated into two groups of privatized and non-governmental banks. The period of the research is 5 years from 2012 to 2016. For this purpose, first a financial strength score was determined for each of the banks using a reflective component-based model which includes 4 dimensions, 8 factors and 51 indicators, Then the banks were ranked based on their financial strength scores in two separate groups of privatized and non-governmental banks. The results show that privatized banks compared with non-governmental banks have higher financial strength scores. In the group of privatized banks, Mellat Bank had the highest score and hence the highest rank in terms of financial strength. In the group of non-governmental banks, Pasargad Bank, EN Bank and Parsian Bank, respectively had the highest scores and hence the highest ranks in terms of financial strength.

Abstract One of the essential needs for Iranian financial market participants (including money market and capital market participants) is rating them based on their financial strength rating. This rating help stakeholders, including shareholders, investors, customers, central bank and etc., to obtain more accurate information regarding inherent safety and soundness of Iranian banks. So the aim of this study is rating Iranian banks, based on financial strength, certainly whose listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE) and Iran OTC market. All under studied banks were separated into two groups of privatized and non-governmental banks. The period of the research is 5 years from 2012 to 2016. For this purpose, first a financial strength score was determined for each of the banks by using a reflective component-based model which is constructed from 4 dimensions, 8 factors and 51 indicators, Then the banks was ranked based on their financial strength scores in two separate groups of privatized and non-governmental banks. The results show that privatized banks compared with non-governmental banks have higher financial strength scores. In the group of privatized banks, Bank Mellat had the highest score and hence the highest rank in terms of financial strength. In the group of non-governmental banks, Bank Pasargad, Parsian Bank and EN bank, respectively had the highest scored and hence the highest ranks in terms of financial strength.