Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. student, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Computer Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

4 Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Design Science Research Methodology (DSRM) is a solution-oriented approach for conducting research that transcends mere understanding of existing situations, aiming to generate innovative and novel artifacts to realize desired outcomes. Despite its widespread use in other technical and managerial domains, and more than two decades since the first exploration of DSRM in accounting literature, its true potential went largely unrecognized until the recent years, when it gained unprecedented recognition from accounting researchers. In this pioneering research, we analyze trends, identify influential figures, and map the intellectual and conceptual landscape of accounting research related to DSRM. Utilizing co-word analysis, co-authorship techniques, as well as scientific mapping and word cloud visualization, we scrutinize 51 articles from journals indexed in the most recent Australian Business Deans Council (ABDC) list from 2023. Our findings reveal that more than half of the research output is concentrated in the four-year period spanning from 2020 to 2023, signaling a growing interest among accounting researchers in this methodology. The dominant subject areas in design science articles are audit and control, coupled with the integration of emerging technologies and data analytics techniques. The most cited work is Guido Geerts (2011) paper, "A design science research methodology and its application to accounting information systems research" with 140 citations in the Scopus database alone. The most prolific author, Miklos Vasarhelyi, has authored six articles and boasts the most scientific connections with other researchers in this field. The State University of New Jersey, USA, where Vasarhelyi is affiliated, stands as the most prolific institute with eight articles. Guido Geerts receives 177 references from his two articles, earning him the title of the most cited author in the realm of design science in accounting research, while the University of Delaware, where he is affiliated, is also the most cited university. Among countries contributing to this field, the United States leads with the highest number of productive articles and references, totaling 33 articles and 555 references. The International Journal of Accounting Information Systems has published the most articles (20) and received the most references (464). The findings of this research illuminate bibliographic factors, relationships, and thematic orientations within design science research in accounting. They inform researchers and policymakers about the current status and trajectory of this methodology, providing a foundation for the advancement of solution-oriented and applied research in the field of accounting.
 

Introduction

Applied research that seeks solutions to practical issues cannot be pursued through natural science research methods as they aim to design and implement solutions to improve the current situation. For this purpose, the methodology of design science (Simon, 1996) was introduced. Although accounting is a practical field of knowledge, this methodology is less known and utilized in accounting, until the last five years, when it was embraced by accounting and auditing researchers. Thus, in this study, we investigate the bibliometric factors and trends in accounting research using the design science research methodology (DSRM) to answer the following questions:
RQ1: What are the main topics of articles related to design science research methodology?
RQ2: What are the emerging topics in design science research in accounting?
RQ3: Which are the most cited articles, the most prolific authors, the most prolific universities, the most prolific journals, and the most prolific countries in DSRM in accounting?

Literature review

DSRM is a research methodology that focuses on problem-solving (March & Storey, 2008), and its purpose is to create and evaluate artifacts that are used to solve organizational problems through transforming the current state into a desired state (Hevner et al., 2004; March & Smith, 1995; March & Storey, 2008). Considering the focus of this science on problem-solving, the application of design science research can potentially reduce the existing gap between theory and practice (Aken, 2004, 2005; Romme, 2003).

Methodology

Bibliometric analysis is the application of quantitative techniques (e.g., citation analysis) to bibliometric data (e.g., publication and citation units) (Broadus, 1987; Pritchard, 1969). Researchers apply bibliometric analysis for various reasons, such as discovering emerging trends in the performance of articles and journals, collaboration patterns among authors and research components, and discovering the intellectual structure of a specific field in existing literature (Donthu et al., 2021).
In this research, in the first step, the Scopus database was used due to the inclusion of more scientific documents than other databases (Echchakoui, 2020). Then, the relevant keywords were identified and selected, and by setting the query phrase, applying it to the Scopus database and performing the necessary filters, a total of 58 articles from the journals ranked in 2023 rankings by the Australian Business Deans Council (ABDC) were obtained. This number decreased to 51 articles as the basis of analysis after reviewing the content by the authors and discarding unrelated articles. In this research, the VOSviewer software (Eck & Waltman, 2021) was chosen for bibliographic data analysis and visualization. Also, the matplotlib and wordcloud libraries in Python programming language were used for drawing wordcloud, and Microsoft Excel software was used for drawing trend charts.

Results

Our findings reveal that approximately half of the research output is concentrated in the four-year period from 2020 to 2023. The dominant subject areas in design science articles are audit and control, coupled with the integration of emerging technologies and data analytics techniques. The most cited work is Geerts (2011)‎ paper, ‘A design science research methodology and its application to accounting information systems research’ with 140 citations in the Scopus database alone. The most prolific author, Miklos Vasarhelyi, has authored six articles and boasts the most scientific connections with other researchers in this field. The State University of New Jersey, USA, where Vasarhelyi works, stands as the most prolific institute with eight articles. Geerts (2011) receives 177 references from his two articles, earning him the title of the most cited author in the realm of design science in accounting research, while the University of Delaware, where he is affiliated, is also the most cited university. Among countries contributing to this field, the United States leads with the highest number of productive articles and references, totaling 33 articles and 555 references. The International Journal of Accounting Information Systems has published the most articles (20) and received the most references (464).

Discussion

The recently observed surge in publications indicates a growing interest among accounting researchers in this methodology. However, auditing literature hosts more DSR research (nearly half) than financial accounting and other branches. According to co-word analysis results, the design of auditing artifacts based on emerging technology is the predominant research trend, pursued by researchers to enhance audit quality and integrate emerging technologies into the auditing practice. These trends suggest an increasing emphasis on advanced audit and tech research in the future, with a focus on robotic process automation, analytics, and machine learning. In terms of actors at the levels of author, institution, and country, dominance lies with American contributors. Notably, journals that accept DSR papers are primarily technology-related, and mainstream accounting journals, such as The Accounting Review, have not yet embraced this research paradigm.

Conclusion

This is the first attempt in accounting literature to conduct a bibliometric study on the research method known as DSR. Given the practical nature of accounting and the criticisms of low practical relevance of accounting research, scholars in the field have turned to DSR in recent years to undertake problem-solving inquiries through the design and evaluation of artifacts. Prospective researchers can benefit from examining seminal and highly cited papers and exploring current hot topics identified by this study to become acquainted with applying this research methodology and selecting trending topics for further inquiries.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Ågerfalk, P. J., & Karlsson, F. (2020). Artefactual and empirical contributions in information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems29(2), 109-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1743051
  2. Agustí, M. A., & Orta-Pérez, M. (2022). Big data and artificial intelligence in the fields of accounting and auditing: a bibliometric analysis. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting/Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2022.2099675
  3. Aken, J. E. V. (2004). Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the  Design Sciences: The Quest for Field‐Tested and Grounded Technological Rules. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 219-246.
  4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00430.x
  5.  
  6. Aken, J. E. V. (2005). Management research as a design science: Articulating the research products of mode 2 knowledge production in management. British journal of management16(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00437.x
  7. Bartolacci, F., Caputo, A., Fradeani, A., & Soverchia, M. (2021). Twenty years of XBRL: what we know and where we are going. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(5), 1113–1145. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-04-2020-0846
  8. Behrend, J., & Eulerich, M. (2019). The evolution of internal audit research: a bibliometric analysis of published documents (1926–2016). Accounting History Review29(1), 103-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/21552851.2019.1606721
  9. Broadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”. Scientometrics, 12, 373-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016680
  10. Cobo, M. J., López Herrera, A. G., Herrera Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382-1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
  11. De Haas, M., & Kleingeld, A. (1999). Multilevel design of performance measurement systems: enhancing strategic dialogue throughout the organization. Management Accounting Research10(3), 233-261. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.1998.0098
  12. Deng, Q., & Ji, S. (2018). A review of design science research in information systems: concept, process, outcome, and evaluation. Pacific Asia journal of the association for information systems10(1), 2. DOI: 10.17705/1pais.10101
  13. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  14. Echchakoui, S. (2020). Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: the case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 8, 165-184. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00081-9
  15. Eck, N. V., & Waltman, L. (2021). VOSviewer manual. Manual for VOSviewer Version 1.6.17. Leiden: Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) of Leiden University.
  16. Faraji, O., Asiaei, K., Rezaee, Z., Bontis, N., & Dolatzarei, E. (2022). Mapping the conceptual structure of intellectual capital research: A co-word analysis. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(3), 100-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100202
  17. Fusco, F., & Ricci, P. (2019). What is the stock of the situation? A bibliometric analysis on social and environmental accounting research in public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management32(1), 21-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-05-2017-0134
  18. Geerts, G. L. (2011). A design science research methodology and its application to accounting information systems research. International journal of accounting Information Systems12(2), 142-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2011.02.004
  19. Geerts, G. L., Graham, L. E., Mauldin, E. G., McCarthy, W. E., & Richardson, V. J. (2013). Integrating information technology into accounting research and practice. Accounting Horizons27(4), 815-840. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50573
  20. Gregor, S. (2002). Design theory in information systems. Australasian Journal of Information Systems10(1). https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v10i1.439
  21. Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 337-355. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43825912
  22. Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 75-105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
  23. Holmström, J., Ketokivi, M., & Hameri, A. P. (2009). Bridging practice and theory: A design science approach. Decision sciences40(1), 65-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00221.x
  24. Iandolo, F., Vito, P., Loia, F., Fulco, I., & Calabrese, M. (2021). Drilling down the viable system theories in business, management and accounting: A bibliometric review. Systems Research and Behavioral Science38(6), 738-755. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2731
  25. Kaplan, R. S. (2011). Accounting scholarship that advances professional knowledge and practice. The Accounting Review86(2), 367-383. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000031
  26. Karami, G., Dolatzarei, E., & Faraji, O. (2022). Twenty-One Years of the Behavioral Accounting Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 19(75), 165-201. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22054/qjma.2022.67031.2364
  27. Kılıç, M., & Uyar, A. (2022). Thematic structure of accounting research by co-word analysis. International Journal of Bibliometrics in Business and Management, 2(1),1. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBBM.2022.122288
  28. Kogan, A., Mayhew, B. W., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2019). Audit data analytics research—An application of design science methodology. Accounting Horizons33(3), 69-73. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-52459
  29. Kumar, S., Marrone, M., Liu, Q., & Pandey, N. (2020). Twenty years of the International Journal of Accounting Information Systems: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems39, 100488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2020.100488
  30. Lamboglia, R., Lavorato, D., Scornavacca, E., & Za., S. (2021). Exploring the relationship between audit and technology. A bibliometric analysis. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(5), 1233-1260. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-03-2020-0836
  31. Lardo, A., Corsi, K., Varma, A., & Mancini, D. (2022). Exploring blockchain in the accounting domain: a bibliometric analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal35(9), 204-233. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2020-4995
  32. Lim, W. M., Rasul, T., Kumar, S., & Ala, M. (2022). Past, present, and future of customer engagement. Journal of Business Research140, 439-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.014
  33. March, S. T., & Smith, G. F. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision support systems15(4), 251-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2
  34. March, S. T., & Storey, V. C. (2008). Design science in the information systems discipline: an introduction to the special issue on design science research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 725-730. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148869
  35. Mashayekhi, B., Dolatzarei, E., Faraji, O., & Rezaee, Z. (2023). Mapping the state of expanded audit reporting: a bibliometric view. Meditari Accountancy Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-09-2022-1809
  36. Mattessich, R. (1995). Critique of Accounting: Examination of the Foundations and Normative Structure of an Applied Discipline. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
  37. Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J. B. (2017). Accounting research: A bibliometric analysis. Australian Accounting Review27(1), 71-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12109
  38. Moed, H. F., Burger, W. J. M., Frankfort, J. G., & Van Raan. A. F. (1985). The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance. Research policy14(3), 131-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(85)90012-5
  39. Mukherjee, D., Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu. N. (2022). Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. Journal of Business Research, 148, 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042
  40. Otero, A. R. (2015). An information security control assessment methodology for organizations' financial information. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems18, 26-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2015.06.001
  41. Pascal, A., & Renaud, A. (2020, January). 15 Years of Information System Design Science Research: A Bibliographic Analysis. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS’53. HICSS. 10.24251/HICSS.2020.618
  42. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of documentation, 25, 348.
  43. Romme, A. G. L. (2003). Making a difference: Organization as design. Organization science14(5), 558-573. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.5.558.16769
  44. Sedighi, M. (2016). Application of word co-occurrence analysis method in mapping of the scientific fields (case study: the field of Informetrics). Library Review, 65(1/2), 52-64. https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-07-2015-0075
  45. Showalter, D. S., & Wilks, T. J. (2021). Accounting horizons revised editorial policy: a renewed focus on practice problems of real consequence. Accounting Horizons35(2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-10768
  46. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  47. Sutton, S. G., Arnold, V., Collier, P., & Leech, S. A. (2021). Leveraging the synergies between design science and behavioral science research methods. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems43, 100536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2021.100536
  48. Thuan, N. H., Drechsler, A., & Antunes, P. (2019). Construction of design science research questions. Communications of the Association for Information Systems44(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04420
  49. Uyar, A., Kılıç, M., & Koseoglu, M. A. (2020). Exploring the conceptual structure of the auditing discipline through co‐word analysis: An international perspective. International Journal of Auditing, 24(1), 53-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12178
  50. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
  51. Dolatzarei, E., & Mashayekhi, B (2022). A Review of eXtensible Business Reporting Language Studies. A Quarerly Journal of Empirical Reasearch Of Financial Accounting, 9(3), 33-67. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.30479/jfak.2022.17138.2999
  52. Karami, G., Dolatzarei, E., & Faraji, O. (2022). Twenty-One Years of the Behavioral Accounting Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 19(75), 165-201. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22054/qjma.2022.67031.2364
  53. Mashayekhi, B., Samavat, M., & Jahangard, A. (2023). Scientific Mapping of the Literature on Internal Audit Quality, Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 20(78), 35-75. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22054/qjma.2023.73687.2458
  54. Molanazari, M., & Geramirad, F. (2022). Scientific flow analysis of behavioral accounting research in Web of Science database. Journal of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 6(12), 27-55. [In Persian] http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/aapc.6.12.27
  55. Moradi, A., Asnaashari, H., Rohban, M. H., Arab Mazar Yazdi, M., & Safarzadeh Bandari, M. H. (2023). fraud and anomaly detection research: a bibliometric study. Journal of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 8(14), 1-31. [In Persian] http://dx.doi.org/10.61186/aapc.7.14.1