stock exchange
Mahdi Saghafi; Azam Pouryousof; Fatemeh Dastgerdi
Abstract
The aim of this research is to examine the impact of knowledge heterogeneity among board members on the optimistic tone of explanatory reports, as well as to investigate the mediating role of earnings management in this relationship. It is expected that differences in the characteristics of a company’s ...
Read More
The aim of this research is to examine the impact of knowledge heterogeneity among board members on the optimistic tone of explanatory reports, as well as to investigate the mediating role of earnings management in this relationship. It is expected that differences in the characteristics of a company’s management team may influence the quality of both quantitative and qualitative financial reporting. To test the research hypotheses, panel data from 125 companies listed on the stock exchange over a 9-year period (2014- 2022) were used. The research models were estimated using multivariate regression analysis. The results show that the heterogeneity of managerial knowledge has a positive and significant effect on the optimistic tone of explanatory reports. Additionally, earnings management also has a positive and significant impact on the tone of explanatory reports. Ultimately, earnings management is shown to mediate the relationship between the heterogeneity of managerial knowledge and the optimistic tone of explanatory reports. The findings offer a new perspective on the role of executive management teams and contribute valuable insights to the literature on the strategic leadership of senior managers and annual board report disclosure.IntroductionGiven the explanatory reports are approved by a company’s senior management team, and the views of board members are communicated to information users, it is likely that differences in the knowledge of senior managers influence the tone of disclosure in these reports. It is expected that variations in the characteristics of a company's management team affect the quality of both financial (quantitative) and explanatory (qualitative) reports. Accordingly, this study investigates the relationship between senior managers' knowledge heterogeneity and the tone of explanatory reports, with a particular focus on the mediating role of earnings management. The importance of this research lies in its aim to raise stakeholder and user awareness of how managerial knowledge influences disclosure tone. It offers empirical evidence highlighting the relationship between managers' knowledge differences and the tone of their explanatory reports. Additionally, the study examines earnings management as a factor influencing this relationship. Since no prior research has specifically explored this topic, this study is the first to assess the impact of knowledge heterogeneity among senior managers on the tone of annual explanatory reports, emphasizing the mediating effect of earnings management. This research contributes to the development of the Iranian accounting literature from several perspectives. It advances the understanding of qualitative financial information, particularly the tone of management disclosures. Furthermore, it employs textual analysis methodology, a systematic and quantitative approach to interpreting communication content and understanding internal managerial attitudes. As this method is still emerging in the field of accounting, the study is also innovative from a methodological standpoint.According to the main question of the research and the presented theoretical framework, the hypotheses of the research are presented as follows:H1: The heterogeneity of managers' knowledge affects the tone of explanatory reports.H2: The heterogeneity of managers' knowledge affects earnings management.H3: Earnings management affects the tone of explanatory reports.H4: The heterogeneity of managers' knowledge affects the tone of explanatory reports through the mediating role of earnings management.2. MethodologyThis research is classified as quantitative, applied, and post-event in nature. Data were collected through document mining, using the new Rahavard software, and by reviewing audited financial statements of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. The statistical population consists of all companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange during the study period from 2014 to 2022. Companies meeting the following criteria were selected as the research sample:Their financial year ends in March, to ensure data comparability.They did not change their financial reporting period during the 9-year study window.Complete data for all variables used in this research were available.They are not banks, insurance companies, or investment companies.Based on these criteria, 125 companies were selected as the final sample. To test the research hypotheses, multivariate regression models were employed using the panel data method. All data were analyzed using Stata statistical software.3. Results and DiscussionThe findings related to the first hypothesis indicate that heterogeneity in managers' knowledge significantly influences the optimistic tone of management's explanatory reports. In other words, the greater the knowledge diversity among managers, the more frequently a positive tone is used in annual reports. This may be attributed to such managers being more risk-averse; concerned about the company’s future, they may attempt to present conditions in a more favorable light to stakeholders. This heterogeneity in managerial knowledge can lead to the presentation of an overly favorable or distorted image of the company’s situation to information users. The results of the second hypothesis show that knowledge heterogeneity among managers also has a significant positive effect on earnings management. That is, as the diversity in knowledge among managers increases, the likelihood of engaging in earnings management also rises. These results are consistent with the contractual incentives (reward) of managers. The findings of the third hypothesis of the study indicate that earnings management has a positive and significant effect on the tone of annual explanatory reports. This means that the lower the quality of financial reporting in companies, the more positive words managers use in their annual reports. In other words, managers seek to hide their possible undesirable performance by distorting users’ perceptions. This finding aligns with the opportunistic theory of managers. The findings of the fourth hypothesis indicate that earnings management can play a mediating role in the relationship between the differentiation of managers' knowledge and the tone of annual explanatory reports. This means that earnings management significantly reflects the effect of managers' knowledge heterogeneity on the tone of financial reports. This issue highlights the self-interest of such managers, who seek to reduce users’ ability to analyze information by disclosing it in an unrealistic manner.4. ConclusionThe results of the present research, while offering a new perspective on the role of the executive management team within companies, provide useful insights that enrich the existing literature on the strategic leadership role of senior managers and the disclosure of annual board reports. These findings contribute to optimizing the structure of senior management teams and can help companies make better decisions to improve overall performance.
Audit Quality
Mahdi Saghafi; Azam Pouryousof; Ali Shirzadi
Abstract
In this research, the relationship between the discovery of audit distortions and the readability of financial reports has been investigated, as well as the moderating effect of management ability on this relationship. This research is practical in terms of its purpose, and the correlation method is ...
Read More
In this research, the relationship between the discovery of audit distortions and the readability of financial reports has been investigated, as well as the moderating effect of management ability on this relationship. This research is practical in terms of its purpose, and the correlation method is causal (post-event). In this research, the data of 129 companies listed on the Iran Stock Exchange during a seven-year period (from 2015 to 2021) were gathered to test the hypotheses using panel data. The collection of information in this study was done using library methods. Related data to measure the variables were collected from the Codal website and financial statements of the companies. Basic calculations were done in Excel. Then, Stata software was used to test the research hypotheses. The results of the research show that the discovery of audit distortions has a direct and significant effect on the readability of financial reports. Additionally, the results indicate that the ability of managers can not only moderate the positive relationship between the discovery of audit distortions and the readability of financial reports, but also increase the intensity of this relationship.IntroductionA significant part of the companies' information is presented through the annual reports. A clear presentation of this amount of information is important for the clear understanding and interpretation of the information in the financial statements. There is a possibility that company managers change the readability of financial reports in order to attract the attention of investors, and control the perceptions of information users. The possibility of managers exploiting loopholes in accepted accounting principles and standards for personal gain necessitates a thorough evaluation and review by auditors. This evaluation aims to identify potential opportunities for fraud and weaknesses in these principles and standards for rectification. In this way, auditors can play an important role in making financial reports more readable through the quality of the audit. At the same time, the motivation and ability of managers to apply personal interests can also be an obstacle to high-quality auditing. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to examine the effect of audit quality on the readability of financial reports and to investigate how managers' ability can influence this relationship.Research Question(s):Does audit quality have a significant effect on the readability of financial reports?Can managers' ability moderate the relationship between audit quality and readability of financial reports?Literature ReviewBlanco et al. (2021) stated in their research that when annual reports are less readable, auditors spend more effort on auditing financial statements. Furthermore, Hassan (2017) indicated that companies with capable managers publish more readable financial reports. Ghanizadeh et al. (2021) also concluded that financial knowledge and ability of managers have a positive and significant effect on audit quality.MethodologyThe data needed for the research were collected through Rahvard Navin software and Codal website, as well as from the audited financial statements of the companies and their audit reports. The statistical population of the research consists of the companies listed on the Iran Stock Exchange. Thus, 129 companies were selected from the statistical population over seven years (903 observations) from those active between 2015 and 2021, after applying restrictions.ResultsThe findings of the research show that the increase in sensitivity of the auditors in their proceedings, which has led to the discovery of more and more accounting distortions and finally the improvement of audit quality, has led to effective communication with managers in choosing simple words and phrases. This results in an increase in the use of simple language and a reduction in the complexity of financial report content, thereby enhancing the readability of financial reports. Additionally, the ability of managers can not only moderate the positive relationship between audit quality and the readability of financial reports, but also increase the intensity of this relationship.DiscussionThe readability of managers' explanatory reports is crucial for influencing information users. However, the absence of a universal standard for reading such reports presents management with numerous choices regarding content and even formatting. It is possible for managers to mislead the users of information when choosing the right decision by manipulating the readability of financial reports. This issue underscores the essential role of auditors, given its financial consequences and the potential for economic crises. Auditors play a crucial role in enhancing the quality of financial reports and mitigating opportunistic motives of managers. As the CEO is a key figure in the company's economy with significant influence, they can impact the company's value and profitability through their presentation of news and reports. Therefore, audit quality as one of the most important factors in the implementation of audit operations in audit institutions should be considered, so that the mission of auditing, which is ensuring financial statements, is carried out at the highest level of confidence. However, in situations where managers possess high abilities, there is a possibility of adjusting and being affected by this relationship. In this situation, there is a contradiction regarding the managers' ability to provide clear or complex reports and the quality of the audit. This issue originated from theories such as representation and stakeholders. Therefore, the moderating effect of managers' ability on the relationship between audit quality and readability of financial reports is important. In other words, capable managers in different situations send a positive sign of the company's status to the market by providing clear information and thus reduce agency costs. Thus, these managers have a greater ability to clearly express information to the market, which helps create a competitive advantage, maintain reputation, and foster self-motivation.ConclusionIn general, the results of this research indicate that the quality of auditing has improved, and the ability of managers plays a crucial role in enhancing the quality and transparency of financial reports. Therefore, it can be said that audit quality is an important and influential variable in ensuring financial statements and gaining the trust of information users. Additionally, capable managers demonstrate a greater inclination towards information transparency due to their superior performance.
